
mslaman56 wrote:Jimmy Wilson is a disease to this community and the entire world regardless of if these charges are true....I hope he is kicked off the team no matter what the result of the case is so he never comes back to Missoula.
I echoe the comments of all the previous posters that Wilson is a thug. He deserves to be locked up for all the sh*t he has pulled in Missoula, let alone if he really took a mans life. His exit from this town, save for his contributions on the field, will do nothing but strenghten it and make it a safer, less infested place to live.
MrTitleist wrote:Re/MaxGriz wrote:Yeah I know, can't deny the facts with that. However it could've just as easily been Montana kids doing this crap.
Could have.. but thank god, it hasn't been. It's funny.. Montanans are known for being gun toting rednecks who are NRA supporters and f$%,k the dems and their gun laws.. yet, we know not to point them at people. Funny how that works.

A Griz 4ster wrote:Right now fox news has this story as the "pictured" headline story on their website. They usually change every few hours. The article it links to is the same AP line that we've all seen by now, mentions the Cat's woes as well. All in all a black day for the Big Sky and the great state of Montana.
Fox News
ucdtim17 wrote:This pisses me off even more today. You think maybe the reason we want more reasonable gun control laws is BECAUSE we have so many murders and other gun problems? We have a million other young people like Jimmy Wilson. We have things called poor people who live in things called cities. We have minorities and immigrants. We also have things called gangs. You don't have these things in Montana yet we have to live with your gun laws because everyone is so damn scared of the NRA.
You can have all the guns you want for all I care - I just want to see the annual murder count in Oakland drop below 100 someday. I guess some of us have that crazy notion that if there are fewer guns on the street, if problem gun stores are closed, if it's harder to get a gun, that fewer people will be killed by guns.


A Griz 4ster wrote:Right now fox news has this story as the "pictured" headline story on their website. They usually change every few hours. The article it links to is the same AP line that we've all seen by now, mentions the Cat's woes as well. All in all a black day for the Big Sky and the great state of Montana.
Fox News


ucdtim17 wrote:MrTitleist wrote:Re/MaxGriz wrote:Yeah I know, can't deny the facts with that. However it could've just as easily been Montana kids doing this crap.
Could have.. but thank god, it hasn't been. It's funny.. Montanans are known for being gun toting rednecks who are NRA supporters and f$%,k the dems and their gun laws.. yet, we know not to point them at people. Funny how that works.
This pisses me off even more today. You think maybe the reason we want more reasonable gun control laws is BECAUSE we have so many murders and other gun problems? We have a million other young people like Jimmy Wilson. We have things called poor people who live in things called cities. We have minorities and immigrants. We also have things called gangs. You don't have these things in Montana yet we have to live with your gun laws because everyone is so damn scared of the NRA.
You can have all the guns you want for all I care - I just want to see the annual murder count in Oakland drop below 100 someday. I guess some of us have that crazy notion that if there are fewer guns on the street, if problem gun stores are closed, if it's harder to get a gun, that fewer people will be killed by guns.

sid2000 wrote:ucdtim17 wrote:MrTitleist wrote:Re/MaxGriz wrote:Yeah I know, can't deny the facts with that. However it could've just as easily been Montana kids doing this crap.
Could have.. but thank god, it hasn't been. It's funny.. Montanans are known for being gun toting rednecks who are NRA supporters and f$%,k the dems and their gun laws.. yet, we know not to point them at people. Funny how that works.
This pisses me off even more today. You think maybe the reason we want more reasonable gun control laws is BECAUSE we have so many murders and other gun problems? We have a million other young people like Jimmy Wilson. We have things called poor people who live in things called cities. We have minorities and immigrants. We also have things called gangs. You don't have these things in Montana yet we have to live with your gun laws because everyone is so damn scared of the NRA.
You can have all the guns you want for all I care - I just want to see the annual murder count in Oakland drop below 100 someday. I guess some of us have that crazy notion that if there are fewer guns on the street, if problem gun stores are closed, if it's harder to get a gun, that fewer people will be killed by guns.
I will never buy that line. Do people really think that murder will really drop off that much if there is more gun control? The only thing that will happen is an even bigger black market for guns will open up for those individuals who feel the need to use a gun in an act of violence. Look at all the drug laws out there right now, they don't seem to be working all that well now are they.
MrTitleist wrote:ucdtim17 wrote:This pisses me off even more today. You think maybe the reason we want more reasonable gun control laws is BECAUSE we have so many murders and other gun problems? We have a million other young people like Jimmy Wilson. We have things called poor people who live in things called cities. We have minorities and immigrants. We also have things called gangs. You don't have these things in Montana yet we have to live with your gun laws because everyone is so damn scared of the NRA.
You can have all the guns you want for all I care - I just want to see the annual murder count in Oakland drop below 100 someday. I guess some of us have that crazy notion that if there are fewer guns on the street, if problem gun stores are closed, if it's harder to get a gun, that fewer people will be killed by guns.
I'll let you sit and stew on it another day and see how mad you are then.
mtgrizrule wrote:Can someone find some sort of % in comparison chart for each state? I am curious how much seperates the highest crime rate from the lowest crime rate.
CrunchGriz wrote:mtgrizrule wrote:Can someone find some sort of % in comparison chart for each state? I am curious how much seperates the highest crime rate from the lowest crime rate.
For 2004 (latest data I could find quickly):
Violent Crime Rates: [per 100,000 persons]
California: 551.8
Montana: 293.8
(Highest: DC at 1,371.2; highest state: South Carolina at 784.2; lowest: North Dakota at 79.4)
2004 Violent Crime Rates
mtgrizrule wrote:
I am tired of the bad news surrounding athletes and celebs, can we please start hearing about some good things again?

CrunchGriz wrote:mtgrizrule wrote:Can someone find some sort of % in comparison chart for each state? I am curious how much seperates the highest crime rate from the lowest crime rate.
For 2004 (latest data I could find quickly):
Violent Crime Rates: [per 100,000 persons]
California: 551.8
Montana: 293.8
(Highest: DC at 1,371.2; highest state: South Carolina at 784.2; lowest: North Dakota at 79.4)
2004 Violent Crime Rates
ucdtim17 wrote:MrTitleist wrote:ucdtim17 wrote:This pisses me off even more today. You think maybe the reason we want more reasonable gun control laws is BECAUSE we have so many murders and other gun problems? We have a million other young people like Jimmy Wilson. We have things called poor people who live in things called cities. We have minorities and immigrants. We also have things called gangs. You don't have these things in Montana yet we have to live with your gun laws because everyone is so damn scared of the NRA.
You can have all the guns you want for all I care - I just want to see the annual murder count in Oakland drop below 100 someday. I guess some of us have that crazy notion that if there are fewer guns on the street, if problem gun stores are closed, if it's harder to get a gun, that fewer people will be killed by guns.
I'll let you sit and stew on it another day and see how mad you are then.
I can sit and stew forever - that doesn't change the fact that your original statement was ridiculous. I know you didn't plan on anyone from Oakland reading it, but I doubt many people here will defend it.



Re/MaxGriz wrote:I find it funny that suddenly a bunch of new posters show up or ones who hardly post appear that hide behind an anonomous screen name and claim that Jimmy is a thug, has been a thug and always will be a thug and proceed to make a bunch of claims that have either never been heard of or were dismissed as rumor years ago.