first of all, you didn't answer my question (big surprise there). moreover, the catholic church has admitted they made big mistakes in their handling of the child abuse scandal. i accept that, and don't think that catholics should abandon their church because of the scandal. i also don't think that folks in the united church of whatever-it-is-the-church-obama-goes-to should abandon their church because of a few things one preacher in the church said. however, pundits like o'reilly et al preach (sic) the latter while ignoring the former, despite their membership in the catholic church.
oh, and yes, i do certainly believe that because some houses were built in places where landslides occur, and then slid down hillsides because of landslides, no more houses should be built. i thought that was obvious to everyone?
ooh-ooh that smell....
My response is simply this..........It's a poor attempt to make a point. Period. I think I pointed out a better leg for you and Colbert to stand on.
I'd rather be fishing.
Read: "Ripping lips" for u PETAns
Semper ubi sub ubi, for the Romans out there.
My response is simply this..........It's a poor attempt to make a point. Period. I think I pointed out a better leg for you and Colbert to stand on.
You do know that Colbert's a conservative right?
Yes. And I don't care. Idiots abound.
I think I am confused by a couple layers of sarcasm heaped upon satire, but ... Colbert isn't really a conservative, right? He's just a guy who comes up with brilliant satire as a fake conservative on his show.
Clinton 45%
Obama 55% What white democrates say to a pollster doesn't mean anything in the booth, the real story of the Democratic party may get exposed today
Hey Jag, where did you find the exit poll numbers?
Considering that (as far as I know) nobody releases exit polls until the polls close, I suspect that he's not really talking about exit polls. Maybe those were pre-election phone polls?
Joined: 17 Aug 2002 Posts: 2392 Location: Big Sky 1232 eGriz Bucks
Bay Area Cat wrote:
Stocks wrote:
Hey Jag, where did you find the exit poll numbers?
Considering that (as far as I know) nobody releases exit polls until the polls close, I suspect that he's not really talking about exit polls. Maybe those were pre-election phone polls?
I interpreted it as Jag predicting the exit polls (and thus making some inference about the inner psyche of Democrats) as well as predicting the actual results. In other words making a stretch argument based on a hypothetical.
"GD it, PETAns piss me off! We're never gonna have a stupid Eagle or a faggy Bobcat as a mascot!"
Hey Jag, where did you find the exit poll numbers?
Considering that (as far as I know) nobody releases exit polls until the polls close, I suspect that he's not really talking about exit polls. Maybe those were pre-election phone polls?
I interpreted it as Jag predicting the exit polls (and thus making some inference about the inner psyche of Democrats) as well as predicting the actual results. In other words making a stretch argument based on a hypothetical.
Yeah what Sporting Life said. My bad for the confusion.
I think Clinton by 3 is a more likely scenario than Clinton by 5-6 (RCP polls) and in N.C., I went off Obama's staff projections which happened to mirror the RCP average.
But yes...I'm a poll-hugger on this one Is it just me or has RCP been getting some great pundit plugs lately? In the past 24 hours, I've heard/seen RealClearPolitics data from Rove, Scarborough, Evan Bayh and even my personal fav; Chuck Todd...talk about monopolizing a niche market (I'm guessing Opensecrets.org is going to be the next big thing during the GE)
I wish Barack would win both, that would end this fisaco, but as John Stewart joked last night, "THEY SPLIT GUAM! It would've been closer but the Anderson's canoe got hit by a sea turtle!!!"
Another split, here we come.
I'll say Barack by in NC (56% to 44%)
And Hillary in Indiana (53% to 47%)
Of course since NC has more delegates today would be a statistical win for Barack - looking at the delegate counts he'd come away with 99 compared to Hillary at 88.
If you haven't seen John Stewart tear into Howard Dean for the way this primary is going you should really check it out, good stuff.
I wish Barack would win both, that would end this fisaco, but as John Stewart joked last night, "THEY SPLIT GUAM! It would've been closer but the Anderson's canoe got hit by a sea turtle!!!"
Another split, here we come.
I'll say Barack by in NC (56% to 44%)
And Hillary in Indiana (53% to 47%)
Of course since NC has more delegates today would be a statistical win for Barack - looking at the delegate counts he'd come away with 99 compared to Hillary at 88.
If you haven't seen John Stewart tear into Howard Dean for the way this primary is going you should really check it out, good stuff.
Looks like the margin of victory in NC for BO will be well over 20 pts, a proverbial ass kicking.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Is it just me or has RCP been getting some great pundit plugs lately? In the past 24 hours, I've heard/seen RealClearPolitics data from Rove, Scarborough, Evan Bayh and even my personal fav; Chuck Todd...talk about monopolizing a niche market (I'm guessing Opensecrets.org is going to be the next big thing during the GE)
