argh! wrote:but could it match the mental cruelty involved in reading gb1 posts?

oh, let's not go and get hypocritical here... it was an entertaining thread

argh! wrote:

Grizbacker1 wrote:

Harm wrote:Backer I have no idea what the "exact" circumstances of his "condition" I was simply commenting on my dislike for folks driving under the influence, anyone with a family or who cares about the welfare of innocent folks out for a drive and being under threat from a careless person DUI should care. That and I was commenting on the per se thing but that's more of a technical nature.

Also, the mudflap is a righteous PC stop. he didn't have all of his vehicle equipment fully operational, hell that's a citation right there. It was a good stop.

A few posts ago you said it was a "righteous stop", now it is just a "good stop". A few more posts it should be police brutality.

but could it match the mental cruelty involved in reading gb1 posts?

Like your posts are always fresh as a daisy.

i like to think of my posts as scarlet begonias, not daisies.

argh! wrote:i like to think of my posts as scarlet begonias, not daisies.

I was thinking more along the lines of knapweed.

Grizbacker1 wrote:

argh! wrote:i like to think of my posts as scarlet begonias, not daisies.

I was thinking more along the lines of knapweed.

argh! IMO has moved into the flower area since he stoped his felony stalking of Player Rep.

jagur1 wrote:

Grizbacker1 wrote:

argh! wrote:i like to think of my posts as scarlet begonias, not daisies.

I was thinking more along the lines of knapweed.

argh! IMO has moved into the flower area since he stoped his felony stalking of Player Rep.

Don't remind him.

At least his lawyer seems smarter than Michael Vicks. He had the smarts to not say that Quinn looked forward to joining his teammates at spring training.

CerealCityGriz wrote:At least his lawyer seems smarter than Michael Vicks. He had the smarts to not say that Quinn looked forward to joining his teammates at spring training.

His Lawyer is one of the best in western montana imho.
and no we're not friends so its not that i'm biased.

His lawyer should be real proud of himself - lets see how important winning football games is the next time quinn gets drunk and kills one of our wives, kids, family or friends. He is poison, send him back to Oklahoma where he belongs.

catattack wrote:His lawyer should be real proud of himself - lets see how important winning football games is the next time quinn gets drunk and kills one of our wives, kids, family or friends. He is poison, send him back to Oklahoma where he belongs.

I bet you are real proud of being a judgemental prick too.

Cat, if Quinn was drunk, why were the charges dropped? Can you site any evidence of why you believe Q was drunk? Or, are you just a troll, and will now slink away?

PlayerRep wrote:Cat, if Quinn was drunk, why were the charges dropped? Can you site any evidence of why you believe Q was drunk? Or, are you just a troll, and will now slink away?

On. The. Head!

PlayerRep wrote:Cat, if Quinn was drunk, why were the charges dropped? Can you site any evidence of why you believe Q was drunk? Or, are you just a troll, and will now slink away?

when will you tell us what really happened?

GG, aren't the facts already in the threads? Officer stops Q for mud flap and turn violation. One post says officer followed him for 3 miles. Q is the designated driver that night for some friends. The officer decides decides to test for alcohol. Q asks for the more reliable blood test. The hospital doesn't do the blood test. He is charged with DUI. There is no evidence to support the DUI charge. The case is dropped.

PlayerRep wrote:GG, aren't the facts already in the threads? Officer stops Q for mud flap and turn violation. One post says officer followed him for 3 miles. Q is the designated driver that night for some friends. The officer decides decides to test for alcohol. Q asks for the more reliable blood test. The hospital doesn't do the blood test. He is charged with DUI. There is no evidence to support the DUI charge. The case is dropped.

i don't consider everything in the threads as facts. such as, quinn being the dd for his friends. his atty never stated as much, nor did the muni court and neither gave the details as to why the charge was dropped, which tells me that there's a good possibility that both have some face to save. and what you've described here lends one to believe that quinn got off on a technicality.

however, if you have gone out and verified these things on your own (i don't think you did, since you referenced the info in the threads), i can see why you've come to the conclusion you've come to. however, i'm sure you can see why others have not. the school has yet to announce that quinn has had his indefinite suspension lifted, so who knows what to make of that.

by the way you and gb1 have been posting, i was beginning to believe that one, or both, of you had some solid inside information about what happened. if so, please post it for jd's sake if nothing else.

getgrizzy wrote:

PlayerRep wrote:GG, aren't the facts already in the threads? Officer stops Q for mud flap and turn violation. One post says officer followed him for 3 miles. Q is the designated driver that night for some friends. The officer decides decides to test for alcohol. Q asks for the more reliable blood test. The hospital doesn't do the blood test. He is charged with DUI. There is no evidence to support the DUI charge. The case is dropped.

i don't consider everything in the threads as facts. such as, quinn being the dd for his friends. his atty never stated as much, nor did the muni court and neither gave the details as to why the charge was dropped, which tells me that there's a good possibility that both have some face to save. and what you've described here lends one to believe that quinn got off on a technicality.

however, if you have gone out and verified these things on your own (i don't think you did, since you referenced the info in the threads), i can see why you've come to the conclusion you've come to. however, i'm sure you can see why others have not. the school has yet to announce that quinn has had his indefinite suspension lifted, so who knows what to make of that.

by the way you and gb1 have been posting, i was beginning to believe that one, or both, of you had some solid inside information about what happened. if so, please post it for jd's sake if nothing else.

I do have solid info, but his Majesty, BAC, said unless I reveal confidential sources, it doesn't count.

Grizbacker1 wrote:

getgrizzy wrote:

PlayerRep wrote:GG, aren't the facts already in the threads? Officer stops Q for mud flap and turn violation. One post says officer followed him for 3 miles. Q is the designated driver that night for some friends. The officer decides decides to test for alcohol. Q asks for the more reliable blood test. The hospital doesn't do the blood test. He is charged with DUI. There is no evidence to support the DUI charge. The case is dropped.

i don't consider everything in the threads as facts. such as, quinn being the dd for his friends. his atty never stated as much, nor did the muni court and neither gave the details as to why the charge was dropped, which tells me that there's a good possibility that both have some face to save. and what you've described here lends one to believe that quinn got off on a technicality.

however, if you have gone out and verified these things on your own (i don't think you did, since you referenced the info in the threads), i can see why you've come to the conclusion you've come to. however, i'm sure you can see why others have not. the school has yet to announce that quinn has had his indefinite suspension lifted, so who knows what to make of that.

by the way you and gb1 have been posting, i was beginning to believe that one, or both, of you had some solid inside information about what happened. if so, please post it for jd's sake if nothing else.

I do have solid info, but his Majesty, BAC, said unless I reveal confidential sources, it doesn't count.

you don't need to be specific for most of us. just a general clue as to who you got your info from would suffice. i'd think they would like it if you would say something here (w/o specifying by name), so that we'd all know that jd was truly clean that night. i'd really like to beleive he was. it'd be real good if your sources came from both jd's and the city's sides.

I also have solid info. GG, you asked for an explanation. I gave it. Then you doubted it. Why can't you just accept it. GB1, others and I have consistent good info. He did not get off on a technicality.

Grizbacker1 wrote:

getgrizzy wrote:

PlayerRep wrote:GG, aren't the facts already in the threads? Officer stops Q for mud flap and turn violation. One post says officer followed him for 3 miles. Q is the designated driver that night for some friends. The officer decides decides to test for alcohol. Q asks for the more reliable blood test. The hospital doesn't do the blood test. He is charged with DUI. There is no evidence to support the DUI charge. The case is dropped.

i don't consider everything in the threads as facts. such as, quinn being the dd for his friends. his atty never stated as much, nor did the muni court and neither gave the details as to why the charge was dropped, which tells me that there's a good possibility that both have some face to save. and what you've described here lends one to believe that quinn got off on a technicality.

however, if you have gone out and verified these things on your own (i don't think you did, since you referenced the info in the threads), i can see why you've come to the conclusion you've come to. however, i'm sure you can see why others have not. the school has yet to announce that quinn has had his indefinite suspension lifted, so who knows what to make of that.

by the way you and gb1 have been posting, i was beginning to believe that one, or both, of you had some solid inside information about what happened. if so, please post it for jd's sake if nothing else.

I do have solid info, but his Majesty, BAC, said unless I reveal confidential sources, it doesn't count.

It counts ... you just shouldn't expect anyone to necessarily take something as fact when you refuse to explain where the information came from. Absent that, it's nothing more than a rumor from an anonymous poster on a message board.

This really isn't that complicated of a concept. Please stop acting like you would treat anyone else any differently ... because you certainly wouldn't.

Well ... you'd hurl a bunch of mindless personal insults (that have nothing to do with reality or anything in the conversation) at them in the process, but the practical results would be the same. Without support for their assertions, you wouldn't believe anyone else merely because they said that they had a "confidential source" that told them so.

PlayerRep wrote:I also have solid info. GG, you asked for an explanation. I gave it. Then you doubted it. Why can't you just accept it. GB1, others and I have consistent good info. He did not get off on a technicality.

He might not be able to "accept" it because nobody with any authority or proven insight has spoken on the issue yet.

He, as most people, don't take the postings of people on a message board as unquestionable fact ... especially when those assertions have no support of any kind from any official source.

Still in "catch-up" mode so I apologize for asking this rather than perusing the entire thread, but my question is why was the blood test not performed once Q requested it?

The hospital apparently said they didn't want to do it.

jagur1 wrote:

Grizbacker1 wrote:

argh! wrote:i like to think of my posts as scarlet begonias, not daisies.

I was thinking more along the lines of knapweed.

argh! IMO has moved into the flower area since he stoped his felony stalking of Player Rep.

if responding to greenie's perpetual idiocies on this here message board is "stalking", then what in the world does greenie's uninvited prying into people's personal lives count as? wearing a lei?

What we have here is the beating of a dead horse because there isn't enough football to talk about.

Oh, when will the season ever begin?

PlayerRep wrote:I also have solid info. GG, you asked for an explanation. I gave it. Then you doubted it. Why can't you just accept it. GB1, others and I have consistent good info. He did not get off on a technicality.

The hospital apparently said they didn't want to do it.

that sounds like solid info that he got off on a technicality. what we're looking for is something along the lines that leaves us all confident that quinn simply had not been drinking. or that he wasn't past the legal limit. and an explanation for why he wouldn't take the breath analysis.

so far all we have is that he wouldn't take the breath test and that he didn't, or wasn't able to, get a bac test. neither of those things exonerates him. the only thing the events that have occured would logically show is that he was given a plea deal.

so if you have something truly solid, please let us all know. cuz we'd like to feel the same way you do and i'd think jd might want everyone to know he was representing the school properly.