bigtyme wrote:http://www.helenair.com/articles/2008/06/06/sports/local/102spl_080606_fundraiser.txt
I can honestly say that this is probably one of the worst articles I have ever read in a sports section of a newspaper that is paid for. I thought Stuber was leaving the IR...if he wasn't, he should! Ridiculous.
bigtyme wrote:http://www.helenair.com/articles/2008/06/06/sports/local/102spl_080606_fundraiser.txt
I can honestly say that this is probably one of the worst articles I have ever read in a sports section of a newspaper that is paid for. I thought Stuber was leaving the IR...if he wasn't, he should! Ridiculous.
Grizbacker1 wrote:Mslacat, from what I hear you shouldn't talk about thin skin. I understand you could stand tightening some of yours up a tad. Can you say gym membership?
Mslacat wrote:I do not know what you are complaining about, the article seemed pretty light weight to me. You Griz need to get a little thicker skin.

griz8791 wrote:Seems like a stretch the way the Quinn reference appears out of thin air in this Stuber article with no transition whatsoever. "The Griz are in town holding a fundraiser and promoting their new stadium addition. And speaking of the Griz, they just had a guy plead to one DUI and get another one dismissed." Nice.

griz8791 wrote:Easy there, Wild_Cat. I'm not suggesting the Quinn episode should be off-limits or that the press should give us a pass on it. But if you read that entire article the reference is out of place and looks like a reach. Kind of like a gratuitous reference to the Kramer lawsuit would have been if Stuber had chosen to include one in the MSU section of the article.
getgrizzy wrote:griz8791 wrote:Easy there, Wild_Cat. I'm not suggesting the Quinn episode should be off-limits or that the press should give us a pass on it. But if you read that entire article the reference is out of place and looks like a reach. Kind of like a gratuitous reference to the Kramer lawsuit would have been if Stuber had chosen to include one in the MSU section of the article.
he included msu's apr issue, too. first, talked about um's facility stuff, then msu's facility stuff. then he talked about msu's apr in a positive way, then the quinn stuff in a positive way (he had the suspension lifted). the story does bounce around, but it seems fair to me and it was informative. i'm glad to hear that jd isn't suspended anymore.

griz8791 wrote:Seems like a stretch the way the Quinn reference appears out of thin air in this Stuber article with no transition whatsoever. "The Griz are in town holding a fundraiser and promoting their new stadium addition. And speaking of the Griz, they just had a guy plead to one DUI and get another one dismissed." Nice.
bigtyme wrote:griz8791 wrote:Seems like a stretch the way the Quinn reference appears out of thin air in this Stuber article with no transition whatsoever. "The Griz are in town holding a fundraiser and promoting their new stadium addition. And speaking of the Griz, they just had a guy plead to one DUI and get another one dismissed." Nice.
Exactly! I did not say anything about why I thought it was a badly written article thinking that most would pick up on it. But I honestly think it is about as elementary as they get. There is no need to mention anything about Quinn. If you are going to compare and contrast, fine, go with it, but don't bring out a point that is going to leave your side one up. But I don't think he has ever written an article that hasn't done that! Lousy!
Cats2506 wrote:Lets see.... issues that have been in the news latlely for both schools. MSU - facilities and APR penalties, UM - facilities and Quinn
Looks fair to me

Return to Montana Grizzlies Football and the FCS
Users browsing this forum: griz71, number1debater and 1 guest