We would not be talking

Get the low down on Griz Football and the FCS

We would not be talking

Postby Copper Griz » Sun May 27, 2012 5:09 am

We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!
Everyone thinks trolls live under a bridge. They don't, they live in their Mom's basement.
User avatar
Copper Griz
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:12 pm
Location: The Beartooth's
I am a fan of: U of M


Re: We would not be talking

Postby maroonandsilver » Sun May 27, 2012 5:36 am

Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!


+1 :clap: :clap: :clap: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
maroonandsilver
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:25 am
I am a fan of: montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby HighLineGRIZ » Sun May 27, 2012 6:55 am

Absolutely right. Seems like there is a lot of blame being thrown around here. Not nearly enough in the direction of whose really responsible...
HighLineGRIZ
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2077
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:41 pm
Location: Eagle, ID
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Umista » Sun May 27, 2012 8:56 am

Proof? Again proof? Normally when following a smell you will locate the shit.

A whole lot of smell but I do not see the shit?

Bright smart and good people must feel free to enlighten me. Just a tiny bit of proof will work!

I want to join the band wagon and begin to hate those responsible! Thanks ahead of time.
Umista
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:16 am
Location: BC Canada

Re: We would not be talking

Postby argh! » Sun May 27, 2012 10:01 am

i can show you the path to enlightenment, grasshopper, but it is up to you to take it.
argh!
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 4668
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:20 pm

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Skookum-Jim » Sun May 27, 2012 10:09 am

Umista wrote:Proof? Again proof? Normally when following a smell you will locate the shit.

A whole lot of smell but I do not see the shit?

Bright smart and good people must feel free to enlighten me. Just a tiny bit of proof will work!

I want to join the band wagon and begin to hate those responsible! Thanks ahead of time.

It's not public information yet pilgrim. You can't possibly believe they just kicked him out for no reason do you?
User avatar
Skookum-Jim
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: Near Prince George BC
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby sdgriz_24 » Sun May 27, 2012 10:20 am

Skookum-Jim wrote:
Umista wrote:Proof? Again proof? Normally when following a smell you will locate the shit.

A whole lot of smell but I do not see the shit?

Bright smart and good people must feel free to enlighten me. Just a tiny bit of proof will work!

I want to join the band wagon and begin to hate those responsible! Thanks ahead of time.

It's not public information yet pilgrim. You can't possibly believe they just kicked him out for no reason do you?

It sure seems like it...
sdgriz_24
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: Billings
I am a fan of: The Griz

Re: We would not be talking

Postby tnt » Sun May 27, 2012 10:20 am

I just have to ask, if one of Robin Selvigs players was seen drunk downtown or at the forresters ball, what would the results have been? Why are football players special?
tnt
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:42 am
I am a fan of: UM

Re: We would not be talking

Postby maroonandsilver » Sun May 27, 2012 10:46 am

tnt wrote:I just have to ask, if one of Robin Selvigs players was seen drunk downtown or at the forresters ball, what would the results have been? Why are football players special?


Are you living under a rock? This whole mess is a LOT more than simply being drunk at the Forester's Ball.
maroonandsilver
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:25 am
I am a fan of: montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Tokyogriz » Sun May 27, 2012 11:01 am

Skookum-Jim wrote:
Umista wrote:Proof? Again proof? Normally when following a smell you will locate the shit.

A whole lot of smell but I do not see the shit?

Bright smart and good people must feel free to enlighten me. Just a tiny bit of proof will work!

I want to join the band wagon and begin to hate those responsible! Thanks ahead of time.

It's not public information yet pilgrim. You can't possibly believe they just kicked him out for no reason do you?


As of right now based on the University of Montanas actions in the previous month....

YES I do believe they expelled him based on one womans word against his.

To blindly believe they had used some damning factual evidence when you know of none and they have produced none is beyond idiotic. You really want to live in a society were no actual evidence other than an accusation is needed to destroy your life or your childrens lives?

I dont understand why some of you even want to live in America with that damn bill of rights that would hold you back from you dream world you so crave. The world were people get their lives destroyed at a whim or accusation however unfounded and the inquisition runs rampant.
User avatar
Tokyogriz
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: Missoula, MT
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby ALPHAGRIZ1 » Sun May 27, 2012 12:20 pm

maroonandsilver wrote:
Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!


+1 :clap: :clap: :clap: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:


This
Image

AG1 - Living rent free in your head since 2004
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
eGriz Elite
 
Posts: 16189
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: Defending the 2nd Amendment
I am a fan of: Guns, Sluts & Money

Re: We would not be talking

Postby putter » Sun May 27, 2012 12:24 pm

Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!



Way too simplistic of a theory.

1) What IF JJ and this girl went back to her place and had consensual sex and he got up and left without saying goodbye.....and the girl wakes up ticked off that he left her? She then proceeds, after 2 weeks to make this claim....

2) Sexual assault is not an athlete thing and being under a microscope had nothing to do with it. The microscope is coming from the coach, AD and school doing nothing about multiple assaults on campus over time.

3) IF JJ did do it then he should be expelled, however, if point #1 happened than there should be consequences for the girl, Engstrom etc. for putting this kid through hell for doing something (sex) that happens every day on college campuses around the country.
So Let me get this straight.....Muslim terrorists fly planes into buildings and we are not supposed to judge all Muslim's for the actions of a few. A few crazy Americans commit heinous acts with guns but it is OK to condemn all gun owning Americans.. there is our congress for you.
User avatar
putter
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 5563
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 10:00 am
Location: I'll let you know....

Re: We would not be talking

Postby tnt » Sun May 27, 2012 12:59 pm

maroonandsilver wrote:
tnt wrote:I just have to ask, if one of Robin Selvigs players was seen drunk downtown or at the forresters ball, what would the results have been? Why are football players special?


Are you living under a rock? This whole mess is a LOT more than simply being drunk at the Forester's Ball.


Thats exactly right, but thats not the question I asked. It seems it has to be a lot more than that before the players are held accountable. But the latter is alot less likley if the lesser is the standard.
tnt
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:42 am
I am a fan of: UM

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Silvertip » Sun May 27, 2012 1:14 pm

If wishes were horses beggars would ride...
THIS POST SENT WHILE GUZZLING LAGER FROM MY TAP-A-KEG (c)
Silvertip
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 4309
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 6:34 pm
Location: Denver CO

Re: We would not be talking

Postby RABIDAWG » Sun May 27, 2012 1:44 pm

putter wrote:
Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!



Way too simplistic of a theory.

1) What IF JJ and this girl went back to her place and had consensual sex and he got up and left without saying goodbye.....and the girl wakes up ticked off that he left her? She then proceeds, after 2 weeks to make this claim....

2) Sexual assault is not an athlete thing and being under a microscope had nothing to do with it. The microscope is coming from the coach, AD and school doing nothing about multiple assaults on campus over time.

3) IF JJ did do it then he should be expelled, however, if point #1 happened than there should be consequences for the girl, Engstrom etc. for putting this kid through hell for doing something (sex) that happens every day on college campuses around the country.



Ditto! A simple answer to a lot of BS.
Now, dammit, get out there and HURT somebody!
RABIDAWG
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 3:34 pm

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Grizzoola » Sun May 27, 2012 1:59 pm

Here's a scenario: JJ dates a girl, and they get intimate, but short of having sex. The girl feels JJ does something she doesn't like, and doesn't want to see him again. But, JJ over the next few days or a week, continues to call her, come to her place, whatever, basically ignoring her request that he stay away from her. Not a few of us have been in the same situation & thought we could patch things up. It's all up to the girl to decide she's had enough and take some kind of legal action, especially an easy thing to do these days, as women are fed up with men who won't take no for an answer. It could be the girl felt a threat from JJ, whether or not justified.

So, she files the TRO. This scenario is based on there being a period of time between the date and the filing of the TRO. Player some time ago, apparently looked at the TRO, which is a public document, I believe, and said no specific offense was specified. I think Florio inflated the situation by using the word, "rape," in her headline and used that word in all subsequent stories. Either Player is wrong, or Florio should be fired for journalistic excess, because both read the TRO. This is my impression.

But, I'm not after Florio. Like many on this board, I'm still parsing out what exactly it was that brought about the TRO and not a charge of rape. The girl filed the TRO, in my estimation, simply to stop JJ from what she felt was harassment, stalking, or whatever. IF this is what happened, then the TRO was not filed just for a bad date experience for the girl, but JJ's pestering her in the time between the date and her filing of the TRO.

This is a scenario only. I have no evidence; I haven't seen the TRO. Maybe she filed the TRO the next day. All I'm trying to do here is present an alternative view of why JJ is at fault, but not to the extent of felony rape. Now, the issue of what UM wants to do about his conduct is up to UM. It's unfortunate that the girl filed a TRO, but perhaps she had good reason to, IF AND ONLY IF JJ's conduct after the date caused her to fear for her safety, justifiably or not.
Last edited by Grizzoola on Sun May 27, 2012 2:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Grizzoola
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 3090
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: Missoula
I am a fan of: UM, UNLV

Re: We would not be talking

Postby billings_poke » Sun May 27, 2012 2:03 pm

Grizzoola wrote:Here's a scenario: JJ dates a girl, and they get intimate, but short of having sex. The girl feels JJ does something she doesn't like, and doesn't want to see him again. But, JJ over the next few days or a week, continues to call her, come to her place, whatever, basically ignoring her request that he stay away from her. Not a few of us have been in the same situation & thought we could patch things up. It's all up to the girl to decide she's had enough and take some kind of legal action, especially an easy thing to do these days, as women are fed up with men who won't take no for an answer. It could be the girl felt a threat from JJ, whether or not justified.

So, she files the TRO. This scenario is based on there being a period of time between the date and the filing of the TRO. Player some time ago, apparently looked at the TRO, which is a public document, I believe, and said no specific offense was specified. I think Florio inflated the situation by using the word, "rape," in her headline and used that word in all subsequent stories. Either Player is wrong, or Florio should be fired for journalistic excess, because both read the TRO. This is my impression.

But, I'm not after Florio. Like many on this board, I'm still parsing out what exactly it was that brought about the TRO and not a charge of rape. The girl filed the TRO, in my estimation, simply to stop JJ from what she felt was harassment, stalking, or whatever. IF this is what happened, then the TRO was not filed just for a bad date experience for the girl, but JJ's pestering her in the time between the date and her filing of the TRO.

This is a scenario only. I have no evidence; I haven't seen the TRO. Maybe she filed the TRO the next day. All I'm trying to do here is present an alternative view of why JJ is at fault, but not to the extent of felony rape. Now, the issue of what UM wants to do about his conduct is up to UM. It's unfortunate that the girl filed a TRO, but perhaps she had good reason to, IF AND ONLY IF JJ's conduct after the date caused her to fear for her safety, justifiably or not.


shhh don't go pointing out that there are a lot of possibilities here besides fake rape and a girl out to get the guy.

good god man
User avatar
billings_poke
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1889
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2002 11:00 am

Re: We would not be talking

Postby EaglePtGriz » Sun May 27, 2012 2:22 pm

As a parent of a student athlete who has signed to play for the Griz next year it is very disturbing to me that a student can be expelled from school, kicked of the football team and everything else that has happened to Jordan Johnson, because some girl has accused him of rape. He has not been arrested which tells me there is no evidence, if there was the police would have arrested him. This whole thing is so wrong. What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
EaglePtGriz
eGriz Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: We would not be talking

Postby billings_poke » Sun May 27, 2012 2:24 pm

EaglePtGriz wrote:As a parent of a student athlete who has signed to play for the Griz next year it is very disturbing to me that a student can be expelled from school, kicked of the football team and everything else that has happened to Jordan Johnson, because some girl has accused him of rape. He has not been arrested which tells me there is no evidence, if there was the police would have arrested him. This whole thing is so wrong. What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?


you do know the police are still investigating and reviewing the evidence right?

Are we even sure the expulsion is about rape or is that just rumor?

way too many unanswered questions here to make the assumption that this is all because one girl said something with no evidence to back her up
User avatar
billings_poke
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1889
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2002 11:00 am

Re: We would not be talking

Postby GrizLA » Sun May 27, 2012 3:29 pm

Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!

Good post...I like the idea of personal responsibility. It is part of the maturation process. I think, even though I think the current president is not up to the job, that UM is going to be even better in the future because of this. If there is one kid in Montana that has not gotten the message that UM will no longer tolerate behavior that we now see being discussed here and elsewhere, then perhaps they should go elsewhere. First and foremost, UM is a university with a football team that represents much of the state and alumni, spread around the world..not the other way around.
GrizLA
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 4373
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Growler1 » Sun May 27, 2012 3:48 pm

GrizLA wrote:
Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!

Good post...I like the idea of personal responsibility. It is part of the maturation process. I think, even though I think the current president is not up to the job, that UM is going to be even better in the future because of this. If there is one kid in Montana that has not gotten the message that UM will no longer tolerate behavior that we now see being discussed here and elsewhere, then perhaps they should go elsewhere. First and foremost, UM is a university with a football team that represents much of the state and alumni, spread around the world..not the other way around.


First good post you have made in months.
Growler1
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:12 pm
I am a fan of: montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby Growler1 » Sun May 27, 2012 3:49 pm

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
maroonandsilver wrote:
Copper Griz wrote:We would not be talking about Pflu and O'day being fired and our quarterback being expelled if - young men had acted responsibly and conducted themselves appropriately. I am no fan of Royce, Gwen Florio or the Board of Regents, but we would not be slapping ourselves trying to wake up from this nightmare if - players had behaved appropriately and thought of someone other than themselves. Like it or not, when you are a scholarship athlete you are held to a higher standard and you will always be under a microscope if you do something stupid. This is a lesson for current and future players. You better come prepared for academics and athletics and you will be held accountable for your actions!


+1 :clap: :clap: :clap: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:


This


+1
Growler1
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 3824
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:12 pm
I am a fan of: montana

Re: We would not be talking

Postby '68griz » Sun May 27, 2012 4:40 pm

EaglePtGriz wrote:As a parent of a student athlete who has signed to play for the Griz next year it is very disturbing to me that a student can be expelled from school, kicked of the football team and everything else that has happened to Jordan Johnson, because some girl has accused him of rape. He has not been arrested which tells me there is no evidence, if there was the police would have arrested him. This whole thing is so wrong. What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?

+1. Basically what I posted previously.
'68griz
eGriz Lifer
 
Posts: 7405
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 4:52 pm
Location: Missoula

Re: We would not be talking

Postby GRZFTBL » Sun May 27, 2012 5:48 pm

tnt wrote:I just have to ask, if one of Robin Selvigs players was seen drunk downtown or at the forresters ball, what would the results have been? Why are football players special?


I seen a WBB player smoking pot in front of Stocks, 5-6 yrs ago. Means nothing, just sayin'.


:coffee:
MSUcks
User avatar
GRZFTBL
eGriz Lifer
 
Posts: 5020
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Billings, MT
I am a fan of: The Griz, duh!!!

Re: We would not be talking

Postby ALPHAGRIZ1 » Sun May 27, 2012 6:10 pm

EaglePtGriz wrote:As a parent of a student athlete who has signed to play for the Griz next year it is very disturbing to me that a student can be expelled from school, kicked of the football team and everything else that has happened to Jordan Johnson, because some girl has accused him of rape. He has not been arrested which tells me there is no evidence, if there was the police would have arrested him. This whole thing is so wrong. What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?


Innocent until proven guilty went out the window the last 8-10 years with the incredible crime spree that has taken place under ODay, Hauck and Pflus watch.

There is also a VAST FU*KING DIFFERENCE between the law and school rules but some people (Jokyo) cant seems to comprehend that.
Image

AG1 - Living rent free in your head since 2004
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
eGriz Elite
 
Posts: 16189
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: Defending the 2nd Amendment
I am a fan of: Guns, Sluts & Money


Next

Return to Montana Grizzlies Football and the FCS

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ABQCat, BDizzle, catdaddy7, Copper Griz, Dillon, Fahque, Google Adsense [Bot], GrizFBDad, JSTGriz, kdigz, kemajic, mega mauler, Paytonlives, putter, tampa_griz, vflash and 99 guests