Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Get the low down on Griz Football and the FCS

Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby Washgrizfan1 » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:01 pm

Contrast how the Missoulian has treated Dean Couture and Jim Foley.

Couture tells the accused, in writing, that any discussion of the alleged misconduct with others (I assume this would include the Missoulian) “would result in your immediate dismissal” from the University. The Missoulian doesn’t even quote Couture, let alone accuse him of threatening to punish the student.

Foley asks in an email to Couture: “Is it not a violation of the student code of conduct for the woman to be publicly talking about the process and providing details about the conclusion?” The Missoulian front page headline for their article says: “UM vice president sought to punish alleged rape victim, email reveals”. Huh, where did Foley “seek to punish” the victim? He asked a question. The article also said that Foley was “upset that an alleged rape victim spoke publicly about UM’s handling of her case”. Huh, how did the Missoulian conclude he was “upset”? He merely asked a question.

Is there any basis for this disparate coverage/treatment?

Bias on the part of the Missoulian? Different and unfair treatment for the accused and the accuser? Gender bias? An agenda? Hypocritical?
Washgrizfan1
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:58 pm
I am a fan of: montana


Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby grizatwork » Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:07 pm

I believe that Foley's behaviors were inappropriate and I now feel the same way about Couture. As for the Missoulian, I am not going down that road. Too well traveled for my tastes.
User avatar
grizatwork
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2219
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:55 pm
Location: NorthCentral Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby Potomac Griz » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:11 pm

Which story sells more newspapers, and gets more interest? Actual news, being unbiased, and being truthful is a far far distant second in importance to trying to make a buck for today's media (not only the Missoulian).

Lee Enterprises stock the past several years

Nuff said...
User avatar
Potomac Griz
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2617
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 1:04 pm

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby griz4life » Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:13 pm

grizatwork wrote:I believe that Foley's behaviors were inappropriate and I now feel the same way about Couture. As for the Missoulian, I am not going down that road. Too well traveled for my tastes.


+1
It's not the critic pointing out how the strong man stumbled or could have done better, who counts. Who counts is the man in the arena, face marred by dust and sweat and blood, who at best knows achievement and at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly so that his place shall never be with those cold, timid souls knowing neither victory nor defeat.--Teddy Roosevelt paraphrased
griz4life
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 4122
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2003 12:41 pm
I am a fan of: The University of Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby BWahlberg » Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:46 pm

I emailed Sherry Devlin about the claims against Coture and Aronofsky. She wrote me back:

Brint,

We'll take a look at those sections of the documents and get something into the Missoulian. Thanks for the head's up.

Sherry Devlin

Missoulian editor


I hope they actually do, although I wonder how the headline will look, especially compared to the "punishing victims" headline against Foley.
Last edited by BWahlberg on Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Griz practice and news updates http://twitter.com/Bwahlberg
Brint Wahlberg - Realtor, Windermere Real Estate
The egriz poster formerly known as Re/maxGriz
User avatar
BWahlberg
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 18112
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 9:53 pm
Location: Missoula
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby GrizMusician » Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:06 pm

BWahlberg wrote:I emailed Sherry Devlin about the claims against Coture and Aronofsky. She wrote me back:

Brint,

We'll take a look at those sections of the documents and get something into the Missoulian. Thanks for the head's up.

Sherry Devlin

Missoulian editor


I hope they actually do, although I wonder how the headline will look, especially compared to the "pushing victims" headline against Foley.


Awesome!!! :clap:

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Florio happens.
User avatar
GrizMusician
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 3047
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby Tokyogriz » Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:47 pm

They won't publish them unless it fits florios narratve of reality she's spoon fed missoulian readers for the last half year or so.
User avatar
Tokyogriz
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: Missoula, MT
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby Noches de Passion » Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:02 pm

Tokyogriz wrote:They won't publish them unless it fits florios narratve of reality she's spoon fed missoulian readers for the last half year or so.


It's a good thing we have posters as unbiased as you to uncover the real facts, then.
User avatar
Noches de Passion
eGrizzer
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 8:00 am
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby funny water » Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:28 pm

Noches de Passion wrote:
Tokyogriz wrote:They won't publish them unless it fits florios narratve of reality she's spoon fed missoulian readers for the last half year or so.


It's a good thing we have posters as unbiased as you to uncover the real facts, then.


Sitting on the sideline watching this play out, I for one, am thankful of the work Tokyo, PR & BW have done in putting out the non-sensationalized details.....it's quite a breath of fresh air compared to the garbage in the lee enterprises pubs....
User avatar
funny water
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2006
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:51 am
Location: Butte, America

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby mtgrizrule » Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:30 pm

funny water wrote:
Noches de Passion wrote:
Tokyogriz wrote:They won't publish them unless it fits florios narratve of reality she's spoon fed missoulian readers for the last half year or so.


It's a good thing we have posters as unbiased as you to uncover the real facts, then.


Sitting on the sideline watching this play out, I for one, am thankful of the work Tokyo, PR & BW have done in putting out the non-sensationalized details.....it's quite a breath of fresh air compared to the garbage in the lee enterprises pubs....


:thumb: :clap:
Image
I am passionate for: God, family, friends, US Military, GRIZ, Protandim, Truescience, and Lifevantage (great products for aging, health, and skin)
video: http://www.abcliveit.com/site/ABC_Primetime_Report.html. http://www.mylifevantage.com/271791 We are also looking for more partners. Thank you all. God Bless every soldier fighting for our country!!!!
mtgrizrule
eGriz Elite
 
Posts: 11525
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Missoula/Denver
I am a fan of: DA GRIZ

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby grizpaws » Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:51 pm

funny water wrote:
Noches de Passion wrote:
Tokyogriz wrote:They won't publish them unless it fits florios narratve of reality she's spoon fed missoulian readers for the last half year or so.


It's a good thing we have posters as unbiased as you to uncover the real facts, then.


Sitting on the sideline watching this play out, I for one, am thankful of the work Tokyo, PR & BW have done in putting out the non-sensationalized details.....it's quite a breath of fresh air compared to the garbage in the lee enterprises pubs....



:thumb:
grizpaws
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:16 pm

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby HorribilisFanatic » Fri Jun 29, 2012 9:38 pm

Written by different reporters. The headlines are written by the editors. Based on floria's Twitter account she is on vacation so Moy wrote the latest, less biased, article.
HorribilisFanatic
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby PlayerRep » Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:25 pm

grizatwork wrote:I believe that Foley's behaviors were inappropriate and I now feel the same way about Couture. As for the Missoulian, I am not going down that road. Too well traveled for my tastes.


Which Foley behaviors were inappropriate?
PlayerRep
eGriz Lifer
 
Posts: 8500
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:06 am

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby br fan » Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:09 am

PlayerRep wrote:
grizatwork wrote:I believe that Foley's behaviors were inappropriate and I now feel the same way about Couture. As for the Missoulian, I am not going down that road. Too well traveled for my tastes.


Which Foley behaviors were inappropriate?


Proceedings under the Student Conduct Code are confidential. It was completely inappropriate that Foley would question, in an e-mail discussing the situation with other university officials, whether the victim herself violated code, and he should be flogged. Now if Foley or any other UM official should question whether JJ, through Paoli getting the court documents released, violated the confidentiality of the code, that's ok. It fits the theory of the lynching.
br fan
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 12:11 pm

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby tourist » Sat Jun 30, 2012 12:41 pm

BWahlberg wrote:I emailed Sherry Devlin about the claims against Coture and Aronofsky. She wrote me back:

Brint,

We'll take a look at those sections of the documents and get something into the Missoulian. Thanks for the head's up.

Sherry Devlin

Missoulian editor


I hope they actually do, although I wonder how the headline will look, especially compared to the "punishing victims" headline against Foley.


From the same editor that allows Gwen to do what she does best?
tourist
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:20 am
I am a fan of: The University of Montana

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby PlayerRep » Sat Jun 30, 2012 9:25 pm

br fan wrote:
PlayerRep wrote:
grizatwork wrote:I believe that Foley's behaviors were inappropriate and I now feel the same way about Couture. As for the Missoulian, I am not going down that road. Too well traveled for my tastes.


Which Foley behaviors were inappropriate?


Proceedings under the Student Conduct Code are confidential. It was completely inappropriate that Foley would question, in an e-mail discussing the situation with other university officials, whether the victim herself violated code, and he should be flogged. Now if Foley or any other UM official should question whether JJ, through Paoli getting the court documents released, violated the confidentiality of the code, that's ok. It fits the theory of the lynching.


It's perfectly appropriate for Foley, or any UM official, to ask, internally, whether it's okay for a student involved in a university proceeding to talk to the press. It's a blatant violation of the code provide information about the confidential proceeding to the press or anyone. You are the one who should be flogged.
PlayerRep
eGriz Lifer
 
Posts: 8500
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:06 am

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby br fan » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:12 am

PlayerRep wrote:
br fan wrote:
PlayerRep wrote:
grizatwork wrote:I believe that Foley's behaviors were inappropriate and I now feel the same way about Couture. As for the Missoulian, I am not going down that road. Too well traveled for my tastes.


Which Foley behaviors were inappropriate?


Proceedings under the Student Conduct Code are confidential. It was completely inappropriate that Foley would question, in an e-mail discussing the situation with other university officials, whether the victim herself violated code, and he should be flogged. Now if Foley or any other UM official should question whether JJ, through Paoli getting the court documents released, violated the confidentiality of the code, that's ok. It fits the theory of the lynching.


It's perfectly appropriate for Foley, or any UM official, to ask, internally, whether it's okay for a student involved in a university proceeding to talk to the press. It's a blatant violation of the code provide information about the confidential proceeding to the press or anyone. You are the one who should be flogged.


The problem with the internet is one can't always recognize sarcasm. Regardless, I am kind of surprised that you took my post as a serious statement rather than one that in fact actually completely agrees with the point you were making.
br fan
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 12:11 pm

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby PlayerRep » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:52 am

br fan wrote:
PlayerRep wrote:
br fan wrote:
PlayerRep wrote:
Which Foley behaviors were inappropriate?


Proceedings under the Student Conduct Code are confidential. It was completely inappropriate that Foley would question, in an e-mail discussing the situation with other university officials, whether the victim herself violated code, and he should be flogged. Now if Foley or any other UM official should question whether JJ, through Paoli getting the court documents released, violated the confidentiality of the code, that's ok. It fits the theory of the lynching.


It's perfectly appropriate for Foley, or any UM official, to ask, internally, whether it's okay for a student involved in a university proceeding to talk to the press. It's a blatant violation of the code provide information about the confidential proceeding to the press or anyone. You are the one who should be flogged.


The problem with the internet is one can't always recognize sarcasm. Regardless, I am kind of surprised that you took my post as a serious statement rather than one that in fact actually completely agrees with the point you were making.


Actually, my response to you was just a joke response to your sarcastic post. I'm surprised that you didn't realize that. Actually, I can't read minds as well as I used to and your sarcasm went over or under my head. If it was sarcasm and you were agreeing with my view, my apologies.
PlayerRep
eGriz Lifer
 
Posts: 8500
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 10:06 am

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby GrizMusician » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:55 am

br fan wrote:
PlayerRep wrote:
br fan wrote:
PlayerRep wrote:
Which Foley behaviors were inappropriate?


Proceedings under the Student Conduct Code are confidential. It was completely inappropriate that Foley would question, in an e-mail discussing the situation with other university officials, whether the victim herself violated code, and he should be flogged. Now if Foley or any other UM official should question whether JJ, through Paoli getting the court documents released, violated the confidentiality of the code, that's ok. It fits the theory of the lynching.


It's perfectly appropriate for Foley, or any UM official, to ask, internally, whether it's okay for a student involved in a university proceeding to talk to the press. It's a blatant violation of the code provide information about the confidential proceeding to the press or anyone. You are the one who should be flogged.


The problem with the internet is one can't always recognize sarcasm. Regardless, I am kind of surprised that you took my post as a serious statement rather than one that in fact actually completely agrees with the point you were making.


Your sarcasm has reached such a sophisticated & advanced level, that most people have no idea when you're serious or joking. :o :) :lol:
Florio happens.
User avatar
GrizMusician
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 3047
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby UMGriz75 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:47 am

The Conduct Code says what it says: neither side can publicize the proceedings. Foley simply asked if she had and if so, is that also a violation of the conduct code? It is.

The responses in the Missoulian were to the effect there should be two conduct codes, one for male athletes, and another for all other members of the student body.

That was really what Foley's question was.
UMGriz75
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 11:02 pm
I am a fan of: UM

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby Umista » Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:13 pm

I can't wait for Florio to come back to Missoula and upon completing her holiday things will get fun and exciting again. Perhaps she will become the head missoulian sports reporter for the Griz football team. She will be able to state how many times the QB got stuck. How many balls he lost. It will be so much fun. Her and president Engstrom sitting in the presidents box drinking soda looking down at the 27,000 scum spectators all the while knowing they are above it all.

Seriously, I hope for the sake of the UM she tones her bias down. If not, we will see hell around Missoula and the entire state of Montana. Her kind of blathering is extremely harmful and bad to the bone.
Umista
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:16 am
Location: BC Canada

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby IdaGriz01 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:44 pm

Potomac Griz wrote:Which story sells more newspapers, and gets more interest? Actual news, being unbiased, and being truthful is a far far distant second in importance to trying to make a buck for today's media (not only the Missoulian).

Lee Enterprises stock the past several years

Nuff said...

Ouch.

Glad I don't own that one. :o
:lol:
User avatar
IdaGriz01
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2280
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:44 pm
Location: Idaho Falls

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby IdaGriz01 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:53 pm

HorribilisFanatic wrote:Written by different reporters. The headlines are written by the editors. Based on floria's Twitter account she is on vacation so Moy wrote the latest, less biased, article.

Point of irrelevance, JFF (just for fun): At most newspapers, Editors don't write headlines, nor do the reporters who write the articles. They have a specialist(? ;) ) to do that. Their job is to churn out headlines with "punch" that will grab the attention of readers. It often seems like the headline writer just skims the text anyway. How many have you seen that don't really make any sense, or don't seem to connect with the article content? :oops:
User avatar
IdaGriz01
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2280
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:44 pm
Location: Idaho Falls

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby WaGriz4life » Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:44 pm

IdaGriz01 wrote:
HorribilisFanatic wrote:Written by different reporters. The headlines are written by the editors. Based on floria's Twitter account she is on vacation so Moy wrote the latest, less biased, article.

Point of irrelevance, JFF (just for fun): At most newspapers, Editors don't write headlines, nor do the reporters who write the articles. They have a specialist(? ;) ) to do that. Their job is to churn out headlines with "punch" that will grab the attention of readers. It often seems like the headline writer just skims the text anyway. How many have you seen that don't really make any sense, or don't seem to connect with the article content? :oops:

In the Missoulian? Almost every single article
User avatar
WaGriz4life
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2677
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:48 pm
Location: Arizona
I am a fan of: Whoever plays the Bobcats

Re: Couture v. Foley - Missoulian Coverage

Postby albinogriz » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:24 pm

MISSOULA..........

"Keep it Weird"......... :?
Image
User avatar
albinogriz
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Great Falls


Next

Return to Montana Grizzlies Football and the FCS

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 62GRIZ, ABQCat, AZGrizFan, BDizzle, Bing [Bot], cclarkblues, coyote, CV Griz Fan, dupuyer griz, grizfan47, GrizFBDad, Grizmayor, grizpsych, hbernhardt, jazzegriz, NavyBlue, Yukon and 115 guests