When should we have answers...

Get the low down on Griz Football and the FCS

When should we have answers...

Postby greasewood » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:16 pm

...to the investigations going on?
ie - JJ, DOJ, NCAA.
Any others I've missed?
User avatar
greasewood
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 10:03 am
I am a fan of: GRIZ


Re: When should we have answers...

Postby Tokyogriz » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:22 pm

NCAA files their first report 6 months after the initial inquiry notice, January 30th is the date stamped on the NCAA initial inquiry letter sent to Royce Engstrom, so the end of July the NCAA should have something to say.

JJ... well he has been judged guilty by the complete sham of a honor court at UM, Engstrom sent him a farewell letter in the mail, and the last option for him is a BOR appeal. I think the BOR/Clay Christian are actually sitting on this right now mulling over their options. One hell of a lawsuit is going to ensue if they expel JJ as is, and no charges are filed. Im kinda hoping this happens as it might help clean out the trash at UM / BOR right now.

DOJ... the Missoula County DA is stonewalling them and telling them to F-off essentially atm. Im not sure what the University is doing/or not doing atm. I would even speculate that Engstrom/Aronofsky in fact called in the DOJ to investigate the city/county to take some of the heat off of them at the University. In a small yelling match a couple weeks ago Aranofsky denied this was the case to me on the phone. At least he stated he did not request the DOJ come to town.
User avatar
Tokyogriz
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1992
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: Missoula, MT
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby G&B » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:33 pm

The JJ deal is shit pure shit. Engstrom and co. needs an Ass whoppen. That would be a good half time show.
MSU can suck it.
Image
User avatar
G&B
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 1354
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 11:23 am
Location: Post Falls ,ID

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby snap » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:40 pm

Tokyo. You had me at 'small yelling match with Aronofsky on the phone'! Good on you!
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas Jefferson
snap
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 870
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:45 am
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby mtgrizrule » Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:39 pm

I don't like the waiting for any of this crap. However, believe JJ, and his family deserve a final decision ASAP!!! JJ, and his family have been more than cooperative in all this BS. Waiting for a decision on him, does nobody involved, any good.

If he has to leave, let him find his alternate options. This also allows for the football team to move on,with or without JJ.

The things not involving JJ, need to be addressed too. The longer things remain in limbo, the more it impacts our recruiting for the upcoming year. Kudos to the coaches to doing as well as they have so far, despite the dragging on of the BS.
Image
I am passionate for: God, family, friends, US Military, GRIZ, Protandim, Truescience, and Lifevantage (great products for aging, health, and skin)
video: http://www.abcliveit.com/site/ABC_Primetime_Report.html. http://www.mylifevantage.com/271791 We are also looking for more partners. Thank you all. God Bless every soldier fighting for our country!!!!
mtgrizrule
eGriz Elite
 
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Missoula/Denver
I am a fan of: DA GRIZ

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby Ashley B. Schaeffer » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:14 pm

Tokyogriz wrote:
DOJ... the Missoula County DA is stonewalling them and telling them to F-off essentially atm. Im not sure what the University is doing/or not doing atm.


Most dames I've had the pleasure of disrobin' with draw the line at ATM, pard.
User avatar
Ashley B. Schaeffer
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:43 pm
I am a fan of: Wake Forest

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby SoCalGriz » Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:39 am

I suppose I could look this up, but I dont want to take the time. How does one go about giving their opinion on getting rid of current BOR members.
I would rather be fat drunk and stupid then be a bobcat.
SoCalGriz
eGrizzer
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:40 am
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby restorethegriz » Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:05 am

I found this information regarding the BOR on a state web sight.

The governance and administration of the Montana University System is vested with the Board of Regents, which has full power, responsibility, and authority to supervise, coordinate, manage and control the Montana University System, and supervise and coordinate other public educational institutions assigned by law.

The Board consists of seven members appointed by the Governor, and confirmed by the Senate, to seven year overlapping terms. One of the members of the board shall be a student appointed by the Governor who is registered full-time at a unit of higher education under jurisdiction of the board. The length of the term of the student member is one year with possibility of reappointment to successive terms. (See Student Regent Appointment Profile for more information.)

The Governor, Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the Commissioner of Higher Education are ex-officio members of the Board.
restorethegriz
eGrizzer in Training
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 7:44 am

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby darts » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:45 am

The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.
darts
eGriz Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:26 pm
I am a fan of: carroll

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby tnt » Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:18 am

darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


Perhaps the staff realizes with the shit storm around him, he can't lead. I'd be very suprised if he has the amount of support from all the team that he has here.
tnt
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:42 am
I am a fan of: UM

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby Raider » Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:22 am

tnt wrote:
darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


Perhaps the staff realizes with the shit storm around him, he can't lead. I'd be very suprised if he has the amount of support from all the team that he has here.



Jesus, do you have f***[*] diarrhea of the mouth here or what?

JJ has more than strong support amongst the team.
Raider
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:35 am
Location: Missoula

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby funny water » Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:25 am

Raider wrote:
tnt wrote:
darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


Perhaps the staff realizes with the shit storm around him, he can't lead. I'd be very suprised if he has the amount of support from all the team that he has here.



Jesus, do you have f***[*] diarrhea of the mouth here or what?

JJ has more than strong support amongst the team.


he must..... his teammates are very supportive.... :thumb:
User avatar
funny water
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2005
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:51 am
Location: Butte, America

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby GrizMusician » Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:41 am

tnt wrote:
darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


Perhaps the staff realizes with the shit storm around him, he can't lead. I'd be very suprised if he has the amount of support from all the team that he has here.


I think it's safe to assume that you have never been part of a team. :coffee:

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Florio happens.
User avatar
GrizMusician
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 3033
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby tnt » Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:49 am

GrizMusician wrote:
tnt wrote:
darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


Perhaps the staff realizes with the shit storm around him, he can't lead. I'd be very suprised if he has the amount of support from all the team that he has here.


I think it's safe to assume that you have never been part of a team. :coffee:

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2


Don't coun't on it.
tnt
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1098
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:42 am
I am a fan of: UM

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby wbtfg » Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:01 pm

darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


If true, that would be a tough sell to a potential dropdown who is looking to transfer somewhere to be the starter.

"The starting QB job here at UM is wide open, unless last year's starting QB ends up not being expelled from school. In that case, he'll be the starter for the next two years and you'll have a chance to compete for the backup job should he get injured. Oh, by the way, we are the interim coaching staff and we'd sure like to be around next year as well, however, depending on who the new athletic director is, we may or may not be around."
“He has the physical ability, plus that intangible you can’t coach — leadership skill,” Reid said. “You can’t always find it. But you feel lucky when you find someone who has it. He has it all. He’s Dave Dickenson — one of greatest quarterbacks we’ve had here — in a bigger, stronger, more athletic body. That’s Travis Lulay.”
wbtfg
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 4523
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:26 am
I am a fan of: Instigating

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby '68griz » Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:09 pm

wbtfg wrote:
darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


If true, that would be a tough sell to a potential dropdown who is looking to transfer somewhere to be the starter.

"The starting QB job here at UM is wide open, unless last year's starting QB ends up not being expelled from school. In that case, he'll be the starter for the next two years and you'll have a chance to compete for the backup job should he get injured. Oh, by the way, we are the interim coaching staff and we'd sure like to be around next year as well, however, depending on who the new athletic director is, we may or may not be around."

I think you've pretty well summarized the situation.
'68griz
eGriz Lifer
 
Posts: 7405
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 4:52 pm
Location: Missoula

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby Spanky » Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:36 pm

Engstrom has all but lynched JJ. If he isn't guilty, I would suggest that Engstrom seek out an alternate career.
Spanky
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 3724
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:04 pm

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby JBS » Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:30 pm

tnt wrote:
darts wrote:The football staff is preparing as though the answer is 'JJ is expelled and will not play the 2012 season'. They are actively looking for a drop down QB.


Perhaps the staff realizes with the shit storm around him, he can't lead. I'd be very suprised if he has the amount of support from all the team that he has here.

What? Did you poll the same 10 women at your "specialty shop"(I'm guessing hair salon) that you polled yesterday? Did you ask them what they thought the team thought of the leadership of their quarterback? What you said is another one of the stupidest things I've ever read on this board. Your stacking them up like cordwood. I will guaran-fricking-tee you the team is 100% behind JJ, and your bs masquerading as reasoned opinion is getting obnoxious.
JBS
Full time eGrizzer
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:09 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby WILD_CAT » Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:37 pm

Tokyogriz wrote:NCAA files their first report 6 months after the initial inquiry notice, January 30th is the date stamped on the NCAA initial inquiry letter sent to Royce Engstrom, so the end of July the NCAA should have something to say.

JJ... well he has been judged guilty by the complete sham of a honor court at UM, Engstrom sent him a farewell letter in the mail, and the last option for him is a BOR appeal. I think the BOR/Clay Christian are actually sitting on this right now mulling over their options. One hell of a lawsuit is going to ensue if they expel JJ as is, and no charges are filed. Im kinda hoping this happens as it might help clean out the trash at UM / BOR right now.

DOJ... the Missoula County DA is stonewalling them and telling them to F-off essentially atm. Im not sure what the University is doing/or not doing atm. I would even speculate that Engstrom/Aronofsky in fact called in the DOJ to investigate the city/county to take some of the heat off of them at the University. In a small yelling match a couple weeks ago Aranofsky denied this was the case to me on the phone. At least he stated he did not request the DOJ come to town.


I think don't think he needs to be charged to have violated some of the student conduct code at UM. It is a privilege to play college football. These are two separate issues entirely. The UM administration has every right to be mad at what he did and take disciplinary action on him Do you all like having UM's name drug through the mud nationally? You realize JJ was a part of this right?

I do agree there needs to be a CLEANING HOUSE from top to bottom. That is the ONLY way you know for sure things will be on track for righting the ship.
CATS RULE!
WILD_CAT
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2209
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Billings

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby AZGrizFan » Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:00 pm

WILD_CAT wrote:
Tokyogriz wrote:NCAA files their first report 6 months after the initial inquiry notice, January 30th is the date stamped on the NCAA initial inquiry letter sent to Royce Engstrom, so the end of July the NCAA should have something to say.

JJ... well he has been judged guilty by the complete sham of a honor court at UM, Engstrom sent him a farewell letter in the mail, and the last option for him is a BOR appeal. I think the BOR/Clay Christian are actually sitting on this right now mulling over their options. One hell of a lawsuit is going to ensue if they expel JJ as is, and no charges are filed. Im kinda hoping this happens as it might help clean out the trash at UM / BOR right now.

DOJ... the Missoula County DA is stonewalling them and telling them to F-off essentially atm. Im not sure what the University is doing/or not doing atm. I would even speculate that Engstrom/Aronofsky in fact called in the DOJ to investigate the city/county to take some of the heat off of them at the University. In a small yelling match a couple weeks ago Aranofsky denied this was the case to me on the phone. At least he stated he did not request the DOJ come to town.


I think don't think he needs to be charged to have violated some of the student conduct code at UM. It is a privilege to play college football. These are two separate issues entirely. The UM administration has every right to be mad at what he did and take disciplinary action on him Do you all like having UM's name drug through the mud nationally? You realize JJ was a part of this right?

I do agree there needs to be a CLEANING HOUSE from top to bottom. That is the ONLY way you know for sure things will be on track for righting the ship.


Do they have the right the rewrite the rule book after the fact? :? :?
Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 5823
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:34 pm
Location: Texas
I am a fan of: The Sinkin' Ship!

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby WILD_CAT » Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:10 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
WILD_CAT wrote:
Tokyogriz wrote:NCAA files their first report 6 months after the initial inquiry notice, January 30th is the date stamped on the NCAA initial inquiry letter sent to Royce Engstrom, so the end of July the NCAA should have something to say.

JJ... well he has been judged guilty by the complete sham of a honor court at UM, Engstrom sent him a farewell letter in the mail, and the last option for him is a BOR appeal. I think the BOR/Clay Christian are actually sitting on this right now mulling over their options. One hell of a lawsuit is going to ensue if they expel JJ as is, and no charges are filed. Im kinda hoping this happens as it might help clean out the trash at UM / BOR right now.

DOJ... the Missoula County DA is stonewalling them and telling them to F-off essentially atm. Im not sure what the University is doing/or not doing atm. I would even speculate that Engstrom/Aronofsky in fact called in the DOJ to investigate the city/county to take some of the heat off of them at the University. In a small yelling match a couple weeks ago Aranofsky denied this was the case to me on the phone. At least he stated he did not request the DOJ come to town.


I think don't think he needs to be charged to have violated some of the student conduct code at UM. It is a privilege to play college football. These are two separate issues entirely. The UM administration has every right to be mad at what he did and take disciplinary action on him Do you all like having UM's name drug through the mud nationally? You realize JJ was a part of this right?

I do agree there needs to be a CLEANING HOUSE from top to bottom. That is the ONLY way you know for sure things will be on track for righting the ship.


Do they have the right the rewrite the rule book after the fact? :? :?


I would have hoped that would have been in the rule book? :roll:
CATS RULE!
WILD_CAT
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 2209
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:37 am
Location: Billings

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby AZGrizFan » Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:14 pm

WILD_CAT wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:Do they have the right the rewrite the rule book after the fact? :? :?


I would have hoped that would have been in the rule book? :roll:


My understanding is they've redefined the parameters and are now holding him to the new, looser definition of misconduct (and proof thereof)...
Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
eGriz Supporter
eGriz Supporter
 
Posts: 5823
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:34 pm
Location: Texas
I am a fan of: The Sinkin' Ship!

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby Umista » Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:30 pm

I must be the only lacky on this board feeling we did not need a house cleaning!

Further, another sober thought comes to mind, I now think we need a complete house cleaning!

Funny how a fire job can change ones mind! Rules be damned.
Umista
My PC is stuck on eGriz
 
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:16 am
Location: BC Canada

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby darts » Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:17 pm

The football coaches are searching for a new QB because they realize that JJ will be immersed in appeals to the Board of Regents etc. likely over the next 6 months or more. Likely, this situation causes, in the short term, 2012 to become JJ's red shirt year.

My guess, is that he will 'win' on the appeals process to the extent that the University will re-hear his expulsion case. If he is expelled again, then that's it. He's gone for good. If, on the other hand, he is found to be worthy to stay in school, then he will play the 2013 season as a Junior.

The prospect, for the short term, is that it is unlikely JJ will be playing football in the 2012 season.
darts
eGriz Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:26 pm
I am a fan of: carroll

Re: When should we have answers...

Postby mtgrizrule » Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:24 pm

darts wrote:The football coaches are searching for a new QB because they realize that JJ will be immersed in appeals to the Board of Regents etc. likely over the next 6 months or more. Likely, this situation causes, in the short term, 2012 to become JJ's red shirt year.

My guess, is that he will 'win' on the appeals process to the extent that the University will re-hear his expulsion case. If he is expelled again, then that's it. He's gone for good. If, on the other hand, he is found to be worthy to stay in school, then he will play the 2013 season as a Junior.

The prospect, for the short term, is that it is unlikely JJ will be playing football in the 2012 season.


Never thought of that possibility. In hindsight, it might be a good thing his RS was not used as a true FR. :thumb:
Image
I am passionate for: God, family, friends, US Military, GRIZ, Protandim, Truescience, and Lifevantage (great products for aging, health, and skin)
video: http://www.abcliveit.com/site/ABC_Primetime_Report.html. http://www.mylifevantage.com/271791 We are also looking for more partners. Thank you all. God Bless every soldier fighting for our country!!!!
mtgrizrule
eGriz Elite
 
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Missoula/Denver
I am a fan of: DA GRIZ



Return to Montana Grizzlies Football and the FCS

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bobsob, bozely, Copper Griz, CrunchGriz, Dillon, eisenhart, gah-riz, Google Adsense [Bot], grizcountry420, GrizFBDad, Grizzlygasoline, Hells bells, jazzegriz, krammer, Lakerhater, maroonandsilver, NikeGrizz, Paul Ryan, PeauxRouge, reinell30, son-of-info, Spanky, tnt, UMGriz75 and 117 guests