Link?Silvertip said:... on the ongoing battle between Missoula county's Fred Van Valkenburg and the DOJ, which the NYT seems to be as suspicious of for its meddling tactics as most everybody else. UM issues mentioned, but not to wretched excess...
kemajic said:Link?Silvertip said:... on the ongoing battle between Missoula county's Fred Van Valkenburg and the DOJ, which the NYT seems to be as suspicious of for its meddling tactics as most everybody else. UM issues mentioned, but not to wretched excess...
The fact that the Missoulian couldn't ask Mark Muir, the police chief during this entire episode, as to his reactions is extraordinary. Regardless of what he said, wouldn't his comments be something the Missoulian would actively seek out? He's really the story, right?griz4life said:Funny that a NYT reporter could dig up a victim's witness advocate and a former police chief who flatly state DOJ is bullying its way through this community. Yet the Missoulian couldn't be bothered?
PlayerRep said:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/us/accusation-in-montana-of-treating-rape-lightly-stirs-unlikely-public-fight.html?_r=0
"But Mark Muir, Missoula’s former police chief, said it was time that somebody pushed back against what he called the Justice Department’s aggressive overreach. He said federal investigators had misrepresented facts and details during their investigations to create narratives of a town that discriminated against people who had been sexually assaulted and then strong-armed the police and the university into agreeing to follow the federal government’s own prescriptions for improvement.
“I see a pattern and practice of severe bullying and misuse of their statutory authority,” Mr. Muir said."
"They [county prosecutors] said that their prosecution rate was higher than rates in major metropolitan areas like San Diego and Salt Lake Counties and that their conviction rate was slightly higher than estimated national averages."
"He and two of his top prosecutors said it was unthinkable that anyone in their office would tell someone who had been assaulted that she was only seeking revenge, or that a prosecutor would dismiss any assailant’s behavior as “boys being boys.” Mr. Van Valkenburg said that he had asked members of his staff, and that everyone had denied making any such comments."
"Suzy Boylan, Missoula County’s assistant chief criminal deputy prosecutor, contested the government’s conclusion that sexual-assault cases were a low priority in the office. She said that she had worked with a sexual-assault response team for 15 years and that her passion for prosecuting such cases had been a driving force behind her career."
"In late 2011, The Missoulian, which has uncovered many of these stories, published an account from a student who described how she had been sexually assaulted by football players after passing out at a house party." [I recall not such story even in the Missoulian. Did the NY Times writer just make this up?]
UMGriz75 said:The fact that the Missoulian couldn't ask Mark Muir, the police chief during this entire episode, as to his reactions is extraordinary. Regardless of what he said, wouldn't his comments be something the Missoulian would actively seek out? He's really the story, right?griz4life said:Funny that a NYT reporter could dig up a victim's witness advocate and a former police chief who flatly state DOJ is bullying its way through this community. Yet the Missoulian couldn't be bothered?
Or did they? And just "chose" not to report the results.
This is Pulitzer Prize-winning stuff. How a local newspaper deliberately chose to pursue an agenda instead of reporting the actual news.
And did so because it thought it could win a Pulitzer Prize.
No shit , Sherlock.kemajic said:Big Government overreach is completely out of control - everywhere.
if you use a search engine you'll see muir quoted on numerous occasions by florio and that muir wrote a guest column (feb 18, 2014) in the missoulian. he uses the terms bully and pit bulls to describe the d.o.j. repeatedly. it's definitely worth another read. muir also referred all queries to the justice dept when the investigation was announced. as in, hey don't ask me!UMGriz75 said:The fact that the Missoulian couldn't ask Mark Muir, the police chief during this entire episode, as to his reactions is extraordinary. Regardless of what he said, wouldn't his comments be something the Missoulian would actively seek out? He's really the story, right?griz4life said:Funny that a NYT reporter could dig up a victim's witness advocate and a former police chief who flatly state DOJ is bullying its way through this community. Yet the Missoulian couldn't be bothered?
Or did they? And just "chose" not to report the results.
This is Pulitzer Prize-winning stuff. How a local newspaper deliberately chose to pursue an agenda instead of reporting the actual news.
And did so because it thought it could win a Pulitzer Prize.
PlayerRep said:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/us/accusation-in-montana-of-treating-rape-lightly-stirs-unlikely-public-fight.html?_r=0
"But Mark Muir, Missoula’s former police chief, said it was time that somebody pushed back against what he called the Justice Department’s aggressive overreach. He said federal investigators had misrepresented facts and details during their investigations to create narratives of a town that discriminated against people who had been sexually assaulted and then strong-armed the police and the university into agreeing to follow the federal government’s own prescriptions for improvement.
“I see a pattern and practice of severe bullying and misuse of their statutory authority,” Mr. Muir said."
"They [county prosecutors] said that their prosecution rate was higher than rates in major metropolitan areas like San Diego and Salt Lake Counties and that their conviction rate was slightly higher than estimated national averages."
"He and two of his top prosecutors said it was unthinkable that anyone in their office would tell someone who had been assaulted that she was only seeking revenge, or that a prosecutor would dismiss any assailant’s behavior as “boys being boys.” Mr. Van Valkenburg said that he had asked members of his staff, and that everyone had denied making any such comments."
"Suzy Boylan, Missoula County’s assistant chief criminal deputy prosecutor, contested the government’s conclusion that sexual-assault cases were a low priority in the office. She said that she had worked with a sexual-assault response team for 15 years and that her passion for prosecuting such cases had been a driving force behind her career."
"In late 2011, The Missoulian, which has uncovered many of these stories, published an account from a student who described how she had been sexually assaulted by football players after passing out at a house party." [I recall not such story even in the Missoulian. Did the NY Times writer just make this up?]
grizfan95 said:PlayerRep said:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/us/accusation-in-montana-of-treating-rape-lightly-stirs-unlikely-public-fight.html?_r=0
"But Mark Muir, Missoula’s former police chief, said it was time that somebody pushed back against what he called the Justice Department’s aggressive overreach. He said federal investigators had misrepresented facts and details during their investigations to create narratives of a town that discriminated against people who had been sexually assaulted and then strong-armed the police and the university into agreeing to follow the federal government’s own prescriptions for improvement.
“I see a pattern and practice of severe bullying and misuse of their statutory authority,” Mr. Muir said."
"They [county prosecutors] said that their prosecution rate was higher than rates in major metropolitan areas like San Diego and Salt Lake Counties and that their conviction rate was slightly higher than estimated national averages."
"He and two of his top prosecutors said it was unthinkable that anyone in their office would tell someone who had been assaulted that she was only seeking revenge, or that a prosecutor would dismiss any assailant’s behavior as “boys being boys.” Mr. Van Valkenburg said that he had asked members of his staff, and that everyone had denied making any such comments."
"Suzy Boylan, Missoula County’s assistant chief criminal deputy prosecutor, contested the government’s conclusion that sexual-assault cases were a low priority in the office. She said that she had worked with a sexual-assault response team for 15 years and that her passion for prosecuting such cases had been a driving force behind her career."
"In late 2011, The Missoulian, which has uncovered many of these stories, published an account from a student who described how she had been sexually assaulted by football players after passing out at a house party." [I recall not such story even in the Missoulian. Did the NY Times writer just make this up?]
I appreciate your summary, but literally the words "an account" from the last paragraph in your post from the actual article are a hyperlink to the Missoulian article you do not recall.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/st...cle_5fd79f90-2b8f-11e1-a73a-0019bb2963f4.html
PlayerRep said:grizfan95 said:PlayerRep said:http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/us/accusation-in-montana-of-treating-rape-lightly-stirs-unlikely-public-fight.html?_r=0
"But Mark Muir, Missoula’s former police chief, said it was time that somebody pushed back against what he called the Justice Department’s aggressive overreach. He said federal investigators had misrepresented facts and details during their investigations to create narratives of a town that discriminated against people who had been sexually assaulted and then strong-armed the police and the university into agreeing to follow the federal government’s own prescriptions for improvement.
“I see a pattern and practice of severe bullying and misuse of their statutory authority,” Mr. Muir said."
"They [county prosecutors] said that their prosecution rate was higher than rates in major metropolitan areas like San Diego and Salt Lake Counties and that their conviction rate was slightly higher than estimated national averages."
"He and two of his top prosecutors said it was unthinkable that anyone in their office would tell someone who had been assaulted that she was only seeking revenge, or that a prosecutor would dismiss any assailant’s behavior as “boys being boys.” Mr. Van Valkenburg said that he had asked members of his staff, and that everyone had denied making any such comments."
"Suzy Boylan, Missoula County’s assistant chief criminal deputy prosecutor, contested the government’s conclusion that sexual-assault cases were a low priority in the office. She said that she had worked with a sexual-assault response team for 15 years and that her passion for prosecuting such cases had been a driving force behind her career."
"In late 2011, The Missoulian, which has uncovered many of these stories, published an account from a student who described how she had been sexually assaulted by football players after passing out at a house party." [I recall not such story even in the Missoulian. Did the NY Times writer just make this up?]
I appreciate your summary, but literally the words "an account" from the last paragraph in your post from the actual article are a hyperlink to the Missoulian article you do not recall.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/st...cle_5fd79f90-2b8f-11e1-a73a-0019bb2963f4.html
Thanks. Missed that this time around. I guess I didn't quite associate what was said in the article to "passing out". Also, I had discounted this accuser's statements long ago, as she seemed to have told inconsistent stories, or at least that was my impression; the police investigated the matter twice (a year apart) and declined to proceed; the women's friend refused to back up the woman's story; and even the belated university/kangaroo court apparently eventually ruled 7-0 in favor of one or more of the players and one/some of the other university proceedings where then dropped. I believe this is the one that got described in the jezebel.com article too. See 17th para. http://jezebel.com/5908472/my-weekend-in-americas-so-called-rape-capital" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; This goes to show that once something gets into the paper, even if later completely discredited, it can live on--especially with a media that cares more about doing a story than being accurate and complete.
PlayerRep said:This goes to show that once something gets into the paper, even if later completely discredited, it can live on--especially with a media that cares more about doing a story than being accurate and complete.
grizcountry420 said:Here's an interesting article that was at the top of the page of buzzfeed..
http://www.buzzfeed.com/katiejmbaker/missoula-county-prosecutor-kirsten-pabst