• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Stitt Cleaning House?

CrunchGriz said:
Yes.

Thought I'd answer the original question, since we've strayed so far from it.
Click to expand...
:lol: :lol:

Although, one could argue the house is somewhat cleaning itself... :cool: :cool:
 
giphy.gif
 
Not sure if this has been posted, but just in case it hasn't, here is Stitt's contract. Can we now get back to cleaning house?

https://hkm.com/football/contracts/bob-stitt/
 
PhxGriz said:
Not sure if this has been posted, but just in case it hasn't, here is Stitt's contract. Can we now get back to cleaning house?
https://hkm.com/football/contracts/bob-stitt/
Click to expand...
Yes, I posted that at the start of this fiasco, when AZ and BearAxed started screaming, in hysterical terms, "F****** LIAR!" multiple times for making a passing reference to Bob Stitt as a "$300,000 coach," followed by ten pages of ad hominem insults and hysterical anger.

Naturally, neither one of the had the sense that God gave a goat to simply look at the actual contract, and add some of the numbers up. It an interesting sidelight to the anger that an offhand comment -- a "$300,000 coach" -- can have to people who get "invested" in their own false narratives, derived out of their own substantial ignorance of these kinds of contracts and collegiate sport coach contracts in general.

And of course, at the end of the day, neither of them has the common decency to simply apologize -- being a "good sport" and exemplifying the ideals of sportsmanship is something they so routinely ignore and is really what they are all about, and surely colors and corrodes any commentary they ever have about the young men that are the victims of those kinds of "fans."
 
grizpack said:
Just doing my part to get this to 20 pages.
Click to expand...
And of course, when that happens, Peyton will instantly erect himself to sternly warn that the posters are going "off topic." Sternly!

Except of course when he disagrees the original posts. Then, "that's different." That is why he is widely admired among hypocrites everywhere.

It is a "careful" distinction, which illuminates the definition of "hypocrisy" as an example, better than the dictionary definition.
 
AZGrizFan said:
YOU said he was paid $300,000 repeatedly when he wasn't paid even REMOTELY close to that.
You are a real piece of work.
Click to expand...
:lol:
One of us is. Now we know which one.
 
UMGriz75 said:
PhxGriz said:
Not sure if this has been posted, but just in case it hasn't, here is Stitt's contract. Can we now get back to cleaning house?
https://hkm.com/football/contracts/bob-stitt/
Click to expand...
Yes, I posted that at the start of this fiasco, when AZ and BearAxed started screaming, in hysterical terms, "F****** LIAR!" multiple times for making a passing reference to Bob Stitt as a "$300,000 coach," followed by ten pages of ad hominem insults and hysterical anger.

Naturally, neither one of the had the sense that God gave a goat to simply look at the actual contract, and add some of the numbers up. It an interesting sidelight to the anger that an offhand comment -- a "$300,000 coach" -- can have to people who get "invested" in their own false narratives, derived out of their own substantial ignorance of these kinds of contracts and collegiate sport coach contracts in general.

And of course, at the end of the day, neither of them has the common decency to simply apologize -- being a "good sport" and exemplifying the ideals of sportsmanship is something they so routinely ignore and is really what they are all about, and surely colors and corrodes any commentary they ever have about the young men that are the victims of those kinds of "fans."
Click to expand...

You really DO have a hard time letting things go, don't you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top