-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Gregorak named defensive coordinator.
- Thread starter OldtiredGRiz
- Start date
griz5700 said:
The maximum number of coaches a FCS team can have is 11, which is what they had last year. FBS teams can have 12 coaches. It's pretty common to have coordinators coach a position at both levels.
http://utsa.edu/ucomm/athletics/iv.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Every Griz DC since at least 1986 has also coached a position That's IAA football. That a true frosh became starter last years says a lot about were the problem was with the safeties. A true frosh starter in zone blitz scheme? Lets just say the talent in the upper classes just wasn't there.BWahlberg said:
GrizFan2011
Well-known member
Griz1 said:
The printed source should be the Missoulian but they haven't picked it up yet. All they have to do is ask Pflu. It's been out there ever since Delaney said he was retiring.
garizzalies
Well-known member
AZGrizFan said:
i think the improvment was more likely due to recruiting than coaching (e.g.,hermanson). That's not a slam on Breske, just a fact. he was my fav DC.
Ty should most def stay with LBs, and we need a ringer for the safties as it is too vital a position to not have a position coach there. Wasn't stoll considering GA work or am i thinking of some other recent UM FS/SS?
Glad its official, long overdue. Good choice. Lets get on with oc hiring, skip Feb. completely and on with spring ball!
Congatulations to Coach Ty! However this had to be the worst kept secret in town. I haven't talked to anyone who thought that once the announcement was made that it would be anyone other than Gregorak. Even on this board which is famous for its speculations, there was little to no discussion of anyone else. Nevertheless I am glad it's official.
As for the issue of which unit Ty should coach it only makes sense to have him coaching the linebackers. The middle linebacker position is the one that calls the defensive sets. To have your DC also being your linebacker coach can only make the team better. The most obvious position to fill would be for a new Safeties coach, but time will tell.
As for the issue of which unit Ty should coach it only makes sense to have him coaching the linebackers. The middle linebacker position is the one that calls the defensive sets. To have your DC also being your linebacker coach can only make the team better. The most obvious position to fill would be for a new Safeties coach, but time will tell.
WaGriz4life
Well-known member
http://www.niuhuskies.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/cole_bob00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;BWahlberg said:
I hope it isn't Cole. He bounces around like a ping pong ball. This would be his 7th school in 12 years. I don't think that adds to a program's stability. Does he know offense? Yes. But I still don't think he is what we need. That's my opinion only and I'm sticking to it. Be thankful I don't make the decision. :lol:
I thought Cole was a very good OC when he was here. We had a very effective running game with Yohance in the backfield. But one thing I remember about him then (with Drew Miller at quarterback) is that he did not like the shotgun. Anybody know what kinds of offenses or offensive schemes he's been associated with in recent years?
WaGriz4life
Well-known member
Coaching stability is not a priority at UM and it doesn't look like that is changing anytime soon. Just keep taking chances on coaches who want to take pay cuts and hope it works out.Griz1 said:
Burn 'em and Turn 'em.
BWahlberg said:
i have a strong tendency to agree with you here Brint........other than hermanson who play consistently, mccord less consistently, and they saw something in tully i was unable to see, especially as much time as he got over rominger the safety positions are/were questionable based on strength of the position and progression of improvement over the season.
