• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

DUI.......Anyone?

WaGriz4life said:
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
PlayerRep said:
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
This kind of behavior is what UM is looking for.

My best guess is he will be rewarded for this incident and it will be chalked up to "kids being kids". O'Day is probably trying to get Maus to autograph his beer can collection.


One other thing, why are parents so quick to rush down and bail their kids out of jail? I would have let mine sit there for a week or so after an incident like this.



:coffee:

This from the poster who brags about drinking and driving frequently. Note the phase in his avatar.

Where is this "phase" in my avatar bragging about drinking and driving? I love how some of you douchebags have little to know reading comprehension and I challenge you to post where I have ever said it was acceptable.

My stance is that I just dont care if people do it or not and that far more sober people kill people every year than people under the influence.....so I just dont get the knee jerk PC reaction to the whole drinking and driving thing.
Couldn't agree more. How hard is it to operate a vehicle at .08 BAC? Shoot I do that 2-3 times a week.

Oh........I just cant wait to read the backlash from the PC douchebags on this post! :thumb:

:coffee:
 
Anyone see the Law Hazmat team in action last night? It sounds like he did it all by the UM Hazmat book? Maybe he hired Sal Goodman? :)
 
Jes-s Fu-king Chr-st., enough is enough with these black, out of state thugs giving our program a bad name….

uh, wait a sec here…….
 
PlayerRep said:
Does Trammel still have his scholarship? Interesting concept of being dismissed from the team, but keeping the scholarship (at least for awhile). Dismissed does play better in the press and on the internet, but being dismissed with the possibility of being reinstated isn't really being dismissed in my book. Not big deal either way to me, i.e. on what it's called.

Yeah, sort of like having a charge reduced doesn't mean that the act was not committed. You condemn Ash, but take pride in getting charges reduced. Hypocrite.
 
MT Head Guy said:
catsack said:
He didnt say we played you guys on the road, certainly you can read and follow directions better than that !

Weren't you the guy who was so concerned about the use of a fake ID for the Bobcat incident? Looks like you've got some more lecturing on the topic to do....
http://missoulian.com/news/local/griz-linebacker-arrested-for-dui-after-hillview-way-crash/article_17f3e544-617c-11e1-ac6e-0019bb2963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm glad it was a fake and not somebody else's could have caused more problems
 
Hammer said:
It was me. When I was driving back to the motel from the bar last night I somehow ended up driving across the footbridge. Can't remember a lick of it just woke up in Missoula county jail this am.

You are such a douche! Keep your mind on digging those ditches rather than making light of something serious. :stupid:
 
Growler1 said:
PlayerRep said:
Does Trammel still have his scholarship? Interesting concept of being dismissed from the team, but keeping the scholarship (at least for awhile). Dismissed does play better in the press and on the internet, but being dismissed with the possibility of being reinstated isn't really being dismissed in my book. Not big deal either way to me, i.e. on what it's called.

Yeah, sort of like having a charge reduced doesn't mean that the act was not committed. You condemn Ash, but take pride in getting charges reduced. Hypocrite.


Nope, saying a player was not "dismissed" seems to indicate the player would have lost his scholarship. I didn't condemn Ash at all. I just asked whether Trammel still had his scholarship. I don't care one way or another about Trammel's situation. You really aren't a good reader, are you? In fact, you are a bad reader.

Actually, having charges dropped and reduced does indicate the charged act was not committed. Of course, there are exceptions to this. It certainly means that the prosecutor can't prove the initial charge or charges.

Bringing charges doesn't mean the charged act or acts were committed either. In fact, it's common that the initial charges were not committed.
 
None of these accidents would have happened if the City of Missoula would take their head out of their backside and put up a run-a-way ramp in the yard. If it works on the Butte hill, it can work in Missoula.
 
I have to congratulate UM on this one, looks like the admin is finally pulling their Head out of their A%%

At UM, vice president Jim Foley said Maus has been been suspended indefinitely from the football team, pending resolution of the court proceedings. He said athletic officials also will implement the Student Athlete Code of Conduct, and any related sanctions.

Of course seems kind of wierd that some no-name walk-on gets this treatments when a certain back-up linebacker did the exact same thing coming down the rattle snake and they were more than happy to let the "legal system run its course." Sorry, maybe I am being too cynical. Perhaps the UM admin has grown-up a little bit and should be applauded for taking an appropriate position on this situation.

Just for PR, yes this should result in at least a one game suspension (for the DUI) and perhaps a second or third for lying to the officer. The DUI is a mistake many young people make, the second is clearly a character issue that needs some serious consequences to put this young man back on the right path.
 
doebrmn said:
I have to congratulate UM on this one, looks like the admin is finally pulling their Head out of their A%%

At UM, vice president Jim Foley said Maus has been been suspended indefinitely from the football team, pending resolution of the court proceedings. He said athletic officials also will implement the Student Athlete Code of Conduct, and any related sanctions.

Of course seems kind of wierd that some no-name walk-on gets this treatments when a certain back-up linebacker did the exact same thing coming down the rattle snake and they were more than happy to let the "legal system run its course." Sorry, maybe I am being too cynical. Perhaps the UM admin has grown-up a little bit and should be applauded for taking an appropriate position on this situation.

Just for PR, yes this should result in at least a one game suspension (for the DUI) and perhaps a second or third for lying to the officer. The DUI is a mistake many young people make, the second is clearly a character issue that needs some serious consequences to put this young man back on the right path.


Well, said LB didn't obstruct justice by giving a false name to the police, either. Contrary to what many of you (particularly cat fans) believe, there ARE degrees for these types of issues.

I think the punishment -- like nearly every punishment I've seen from either school -- is appropriate.
 
Pretty sure this type of behavior is called "Stuberging"......similar to planking but involves alcohol, a fence and a car.

:coffee:

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
 
doebrmn said:
I have to congratulate UM on this one, looks like the admin is finally pulling their Head out of their A%%

At UM, vice president Jim Foley said Maus has been been suspended indefinitely from the football team, pending resolution of the court proceedings. He said athletic officials also will implement the Student Athlete Code of Conduct, and any related sanctions.

Of course seems kind of wierd that some no-name walk-on gets this treatments when a certain back-up linebacker did the exact same thing coming down the rattle snake and they were more than happy to let the "legal system run its course." Sorry, maybe I am being too cynical. Perhaps the UM admin has grown-up a little bit and should be applauded for taking an appropriate position on this situation.

Just for PR, yes this should result in at least a one game suspension (for the DUI) and perhaps a second or third for lying to the officer. The DUI is a mistake many young people make, the second is clearly a character issue that needs some serious consequences to put this young man back on the right path.

we will have to see how consistant UM is from this point on....this was an 'easy one' given the name/status of athlete involved. Lets see what happens with 'name' athletes down the road....the best predictor of future UM handling is based on some inconsistant application of the "rules" in the past
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
If that many players are getting caught, I wonder how many are DUI and not getting caught. :geek:


How many are on any teams' roster? Answer that and you've got your total (as long as it's not Oral Roberts or BYU. Those players only drink at home....).
 
EverettGriz said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
If that many players are getting caught, I wonder how many are DUI and not getting caught. :geek:


How many are on any teams' roster? Answer that and you've got your total (as long as it's not Oral Roberts or BYU. Those players only drink at home....).
Question....why should we care about the ones that are not getting caught?
 
PlayerRep said:
Growler1 said:
PlayerRep said:
Does Trammel still have his scholarship? Interesting concept of being dismissed from the team, but keeping the scholarship (at least for awhile). Dismissed does play better in the press and on the internet, but being dismissed with the possibility of being reinstated isn't really being dismissed in my book. Not big deal either way to me, i.e. on what it's called.

Yeah, sort of like having a charge reduced doesn't mean that the act was not committed. You condemn Ash, but take pride in getting charges reduced. Hypocrite.


Nope, saying a player was not "dismissed" seems to indicate the player would have lost his scholarship. I didn't condemn Ash at all. I just asked whether Trammel still had his scholarship. I don't care one way or another about Trammel's situation. You really aren't a good reader, are you? In fact, you are a bad reader.

Actually, having charges dropped and reduced does indicate the charged act was not committed. Of course, there are exceptions to this. It certainly means that the prosecutor can't prove the initial charge or charges.

Bringing charges doesn't mean the charged act or acts were committed either. In fact, it's common that the initial charges were not committed.

Spin-Doctor post # 705

I'm a bad reader!!! Oh my gawd, I won't sleep for weeks! :cry:
 
Back
Top