



WILDCATFAN wrote:Montana is unquestionably the favorite for next year, I cant wait to see what new look Weber has to offer.
WSUnPurple wrote:WILDCATFAN wrote:Montana is unquestionably the favorite for next year, I cant wait to see what new look Weber has to offer.
just like Weber was unquestionably the favorite last season.
I'll take WSU w/ UM a close second this coming season.

Rahe can X, and O with the best of them

EverettGriz wrote:Rahe can X, and O with the best of them
I would have agreed with that until mid-way through last season. Frankly, I thought he got out-coached at ISU, and certainly did in both games against Montana. I wonder if teams are beginning to catch-up with what he's doing at Weber.
PeauxRouge wrote:http://www.bigskybball.com/2012/04/early-2012-13-big-sky-rankings.html
I had been thinking about rankins today and came across these rankings for next season. Thoughts? I have no doubt that UM and WSU will be one and two. I don't disagree with NCU being three on the list as they came on strong towards the end of the season. I actually think PSU will be higher than seven, too.
1. UM
2. WSU
3. UNC
4. EWU
5. Sac St
6. MSU
7. PSU
8. UND
9. SUU
10. NAU
11. ISU

WSUnPurple wrote:EverettGriz wrote:Rahe can X, and O with the best of them
I would have agreed with that until mid-way through last season. Frankly, I thought he got out-coached at ISU, and certainly did in both games against Montana. I wonder if teams are beginning to catch-up with what he's doing at Weber.
Ya, it didn't have Anything to do with losing 3 key big men. Otis (Starter) played in 1 conference game, Hajek
Played in 4 conference games. After Bullinger (Starter) came back he was largely ineffective.
He was not even close to being the same player who earned him 1st team in '10-'11 after this injury

WSUnPurple wrote:WILDCATFAN wrote:Montana is unquestionably the favorite for next year, I cant wait to see what new look Weber has to offer.
just like Weber was unquestionably the favorite last season.
I'll take WSU w/ UM a close second this coming season.
AZDoc wrote:WSUnPurple wrote:WILDCATFAN wrote:Montana is unquestionably the favorite for next year, I cant wait to see what new look Weber has to offer.
just like Weber was unquestionably the favorite last season.
I'll take WSU w/ UM a close second this coming season.
I was thinking the same thing as I was reading this. I think Weber loses a huge part of their team, but at times he tried a little too hard. They may be a better "team" next season...as we were without BQ. I do agree that there are only 2 top teams in the league next season.
GrizLA wrote:AZDoc wrote:WSUnPurple wrote:WILDCATFAN wrote:Montana is unquestionably the favorite for next year, I cant wait to see what new look Weber has to offer.
just like Weber was unquestionably the favorite last season.
I'll take WSU w/ UM a close second this coming season.
I was thinking the same thing as I was reading this. I think Weber loses a huge part of their team, but at times he tried a little too hard. They may be a better "team" next season...as we were without BQ. I do agree that there are only 2 top teams in the league next season.
I think UM is undoubtedly the favorite and will remain so, even to advancing in the NCAA, but I think there are 3 others that will give some good competition...Idaho State showed real flashes of what could be with good coaching, as did Portland. Southern Utah can recruit world wide as the Mormon schools can. And NCU and EWU could surprise. But, one thing about the Big Sky is the out of conference record...from top to bottom it needs to improve.
WSUWALDO wrote:GrizLA wrote:AZDoc wrote:WSUnPurple wrote:
just like Weber was unquestionably the favorite last season.
I'll take WSU w/ UM a close second this coming season.
I was thinking the same thing as I was reading this. I think Weber loses a huge part of their team, but at times he tried a little too hard. They may be a better "team" next season...as we were without BQ. I do agree that there are only 2 top teams in the league next season.
I think UM is undoubtedly the favorite and will remain so, even to advancing in the NCAA, but I think there are 3 others that will give some good competition...Idaho State showed real flashes of what could be with good coaching, as did Portland. Southern Utah can recruit world wide as the Mormon schools can. And NCU and EWU could surprise. But, one thing about the Big Sky is the out of conference record...from top to bottom it needs to improve.
Hmmm...interesting. I see where you are going and I'm right there with you; hoping that the Big Sky improves overall, not just at the top.
UM is without a doubt the top team returning next year. However, losing Selvig and Stewart (not to mention Evans) will cause some growing problems, but Tinkle will be up to the task. Besides, Cherry, Ward, and Jamaar should be enough to keep the Grizz moving forward. The Grizz have the best backcourt in the Sky. Weber...well, a lot depends on the development of Wheelright. Bamforth started going backwards at the end of the season and not traveling with the team for the last game isn't the best thing for my beloved Wildcats. However, Rahe gets the most out of his players, and if he has a relatively injury free year, Weber should be tough.
As for everyone else...State, YIKES!! There is talent in Bozeman, but does the coach know how to get his guys to play team ball? Huse is a solid recruiter and good assistant, but a lousy head coach. His teams excell at times, but more often than not, under-achieve. Still enough talent to get to the tourny.
NAU, ISU, and SUU...well, each will definitely struggle with new coaches, systems, and turnover. None had much coming back. On a side note -only one school gets the benefit of recruiting world-wide in Utah and thats BYU. Just because a school is in Utah doesn't mean it gets an edge in any sort of extra recruiting.- Example, Weber has 0 LDS kids on its current roster, maybe a walk on or two will appear later on, but does have 2 kids on missions (6-10 Van Pelt and 6-7 Fuller). However, Rahe hasn't been to kind to Returning Missionaries. Out of the total he has had only 1, Mahoney, has lasted. Jordan Wood is an RM, so that means Weber and Montana, last year, had an even amount.- As for SUU, ISU, and NAU Those three will sit at the bottom next year. Any win in the OOC for those three will be a huge bonus to the conference as a whole.
SAC...well, the Hornets are my dark horse next year. Katz has put together a pretty dangerous and talented team. But, I wouldn't be surprised if they don't make the tourny. If they do, it shouldn't be a huge surprise either. Finally, PSU, MSU, UNCO, Eastern and UND will take up spots in the middle with UNCO and Eastern challenging the front runners.
UM
Weber
Eastern
SAC
PSU
UNCO
MSU
UND
ISU
SUU
NAU
UM to UNCO will be anywhere in the top 175RPI, everyone else...in scary territory.
PeauxRouge wrote:After reading about the cats and the players they have lost, I think the cats are going to be around the bottom feeders. Somewhere around #9 or lower. This could be a terrible season for them, perhaps Huse's last?

WSUWALDO wrote:SAC...well, the Hornets are my dark horse next year. Katz has put together a pretty dangerous and talented team. But, I wouldn't be surprised if they don't make the tourny. If they do, it shouldn't be a huge surprise either. Finally, PSU, MSU, UNCO, Eastern and UND will take up spots in the middle with UNCO and Eastern challenging the front runners.
Return to Montana Grizzlies Basketball
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests