RABIDAWG said:Who the hell is "the woman"? Isn't this public info now that she's testifying?
grizfnz said:Interesting testimony from Jane Doe.
"i knew I was going to get raped"
Followed by text to roommate
"OMG I think I just got raped".
During cross examination will the defense push the issue of the difference between I knew and I think?
Also can anybody verify if the accused has arms long enough to "arm bar" Jane across the chest and still be able to fully remove leggings and underwear from her who via testimony said she was resisting and trying to push him off with her legs and holding her legs together?
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
BDizzle said:As iltc said.
ilovethecats said:BDizzle said:As iltc said.
it's actually ilovethecats. or i love the cats. say it with me. I...LOVE...THE...CATS...
JSTGriz said:so...... with my freedom of speech do i have the right to release the accusers name if i know it?
wbtfg said:JSTGriz said:so...... with my freedom of speech do i have the right to release the accusers name if i know it?
I dont know about the law, but, imho, it would be in very poor taste if you did.
there's an old joke and a great book Eats, Shoots, and LeavesSilvertip said:ilovethecats said:BDizzle said:As iltc said.
it's actually ilovethecats. or i love the cats. say it with me. I...LOVE...THE...CATS...
"What is this thing called love?" versus "What is this thing called, love?" Ah, punctuation!
Blgs Griz Fan said:It's the prosecutions duty to paint JJ as guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that is what they are rtrying to do with this testimony. Having sat in on a sexual molestation case I can remember listening to the prosecution and their arguments and looking at the defenedent thinking what a dirty low life sob he was. Then the defense came forward and I listened to that argument and realized it may be entirely different. The end result of that trial was 11 innocent and 1 guilty, hung jury.
grizpack said:Blgs Griz Fan said:It's the prosecutions duty to paint JJ as guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that is what they are rtrying to do with this testimony. Having sat in on a sexual molestation case I can remember listening to the prosecution and their arguments and looking at the defenedent thinking what a dirty low life sob he was. Then the defense came forward and I listened to that argument and realized it may be entirely different. The end result of that trial was 11 innocent and 1 guilty, hung jury.
If the prosecution isn't "winning" at this point in the trial, they are REALLY bad. They are trying to hit their home run with the first witness.
The defense will pick her story to pieces. I bet we are going to hear that she has several versions of the story.
JSTGriz said:so...... with my freedom of speech do i have the right to release the accusers name if i know it?
wbtfg said:Am i reading correctly that jj's attorney hired a P.I. before woman contacted police?