Do you believe in our Griz this season?

Get the low down on Griz/FCS Football
CFallsGriz
eGriz Club
Posts: 2339
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: MTOWN

Dutch Lane wrote:
Tue Sep 11, 2018 2:34 pm
CFallsGriz wrote:
Tue Sep 11, 2018 1:04 am
Ursa Major wrote:
Tue Sep 11, 2018 12:22 am
With 100% metaphysical Certitude.
You couldn't have used "certainty?"

Also, dude..."certitude" is not the preferred nomenclature. And never, ever, capitalize "certitude." It's just embarrassing.

POTY -1

:thumb:
Thanks Walter. Lol :thumb:
I take it URSA is not a golfer... :clap:

"If it's true that our species is alone in the Universe, then I'd have to say that the Universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin
User avatar
ordigger
eGriz Club
Posts: 4773
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Wandering

Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Grizzly96
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:37 pm
Location: Gods Country

ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 am
Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Have to disagree on the Stitt part. Offense would have better “stats” yes, but produce better results on the score board? No, based off past results when it mattered. Also, I think the OL issues would be even worse due to his blocking schemes in his offense. This team under Stitt would be 1-2 at this point because while Stitt is an offensive minded coach, he was not a motivator. Hauck’s ability to do this was the reason the team withstood NI’s comeback attempt in the first game, over came a sluggish first half against Drake, and came back from 14 down in the first 2 1/2 mins against WIU. While the last one was lost, it would have been a lopsided loss under Stitt.

I get you like Stitt, I supported him while he was here, but I had to finally realize he was not a good head coach. This years team has a lot to work on and iron out, but they are playing way better than they would have under Stitt. With Hauck here I think they have a legitimate shot to make playoffs maybe pull out 1 victory. If Stitt was still here, no, I don’t think they would have, even with players leaving/staying or not.
"Now let's the rest of us go on to Montana." Gus McCrae-Lonesome Dove
User avatar
ordigger
eGriz Club
Posts: 4773
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Wandering

Grizzly96 wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:56 am
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 am
Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Have to disagree on the Stitt part. Offense would have better “stats” yes, but produce better results on the score board? No, based off past results when it mattered. Also, I think the OL issues would be even worse due to his blocking schemes in his offense. This team under Stitt would be 1-2 at this point because while Stitt is an offensive minded coach, he was not a motivator. Hauck’s ability to do this was the reason the team withstood NI’s comeback attempt in the first game, over came a sluggish first half against Drake, and came back from 14 down in the first 2 1/2 mins against WIU. While the last one was lost, it would have been a lopsided loss under Stitt.

I get you like Stitt, I supported him while he was here, but I had to finally realize he was not a good head coach. This years team has a lot to work on and iron out, but they are playing way better than they would have under Stitt. With Hauck here I think they have a legitimate shot to make playoffs maybe pull out 1 victory. If Stitt was still here, no, I don’t think they would have, even with players leaving/staying or not.
Disagree - O-Line would’ve been much better under Stitt. Torres would’ve stayed, and another player that left for a medical reason may not have left. That exact blocking scheme is the reason it would’ve been better. These guys were recruited by Stitt for his offense. I happen to believe we would be 3-0 with Stitt. Of course it doesn’t really matter, and that’s just my opinion. Stitt was fine as a head coach, 98% of the schools out there would’ve renewed him.
User avatar
get'em_griz
eGriz Club
Posts: 5491
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:30 am
Location: Helena, MT

ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:39 pm
Grizzly96 wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:56 am
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 am
Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Have to disagree on the Stitt part. Offense would have better “stats” yes, but produce better results on the score board? No, based off past results when it mattered. Also, I think the OL issues would be even worse due to his blocking schemes in his offense. This team under Stitt would be 1-2 at this point because while Stitt is an offensive minded coach, he was not a motivator. Hauck’s ability to do this was the reason the team withstood NI’s comeback attempt in the first game, over came a sluggish first half against Drake, and came back from 14 down in the first 2 1/2 mins against WIU. While the last one was lost, it would have been a lopsided loss under Stitt.

I get you like Stitt, I supported him while he was here, but I had to finally realize he was not a good head coach. This years team has a lot to work on and iron out, but they are playing way better than they would have under Stitt. With Hauck here I think they have a legitimate shot to make playoffs maybe pull out 1 victory. If Stitt was still here, no, I don’t think they would have, even with players leaving/staying or not.
Disagree - O-Line would’ve been much better under Stitt. Torres would’ve stayed, and another player that left for a medical reason may not have left. That exact blocking scheme is the reason it would’ve been better. These guys were recruited by Stitt for his offense. I happen to believe we would be 3-0 with Stitt. Of course it doesn’t really matter, and that’s just my opinion. Stitt was fine as a head coach, 98% of the schools out there would’ve renewed him.
You think the Griz would be 3-0? Not with Semore still calling the shots on defense...
2012 UM Alumnus
Total Home Games attended: 81 and counting...
Total Road Games attended: 13 ('07 State, '08 EWU, '08 NC, '14 UW, '14 EWU, '15 PSU, '15 NDSU, '16 EWU, ‘17 UW, ‘17 PSU, ‘17 ISU, ‘17 WSU, ‘17 State)
User avatar
ordigger
eGriz Club
Posts: 4773
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Wandering

get'em_griz wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:42 pm
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:39 pm
Grizzly96 wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:56 am
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 am
Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Have to disagree on the Stitt part. Offense would have better “stats” yes, but produce better results on the score board? No, based off past results when it mattered. Also, I think the OL issues would be even worse due to his blocking schemes in his offense. This team under Stitt would be 1-2 at this point because while Stitt is an offensive minded coach, he was not a motivator. Hauck’s ability to do this was the reason the team withstood NI’s comeback attempt in the first game, over came a sluggish first half against Drake, and came back from 14 down in the first 2 1/2 mins against WIU. While the last one was lost, it would have been a lopsided loss under Stitt.

I get you like Stitt, I supported him while he was here, but I had to finally realize he was not a good head coach. This years team has a lot to work on and iron out, but they are playing way better than they would have under Stitt. With Hauck here I think they have a legitimate shot to make playoffs maybe pull out 1 victory. If Stitt was still here, no, I don’t think they would have, even with players leaving/staying or not.
Disagree - O-Line would’ve been much better under Stitt. Torres would’ve stayed, and another player that left for a medical reason may not have left. That exact blocking scheme is the reason it would’ve been better. These guys were recruited by Stitt for his offense. I happen to believe we would be 3-0 with Stitt. Of course it doesn’t really matter, and that’s just my opinion. Stitt was fine as a head coach, 98% of the schools out there would’ve renewed him.
You think the Griz would be 3-0? Not with Semore still calling the shots on defense...
Current DC has same rep as Semore if you believe UNLV fans. Read their board about him. It’s uncanny how their complaints mirrored our complaints about Semore. Not my opinion, butRunnin Rebs opinion. The great thing is that nobody can prove me wrong about 3-0. Lol

I still believe Hauck wins at least one in the playoffs this year.
Raider
eGriz Club
Posts: 2330
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:35 pm
Location: Missoula

ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:39 pm
Grizzly96 wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:56 am
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 am
Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Have to disagree on the Stitt part. Offense would have better “stats” yes, but produce better results on the score board? No, based off past results when it mattered. Also, I think the OL issues would be even worse due to his blocking schemes in his offense. This team under Stitt would be 1-2 at this point because while Stitt is an offensive minded coach, he was not a motivator. Hauck’s ability to do this was the reason the team withstood NI’s comeback attempt in the first game, over came a sluggish first half against Drake, and came back from 14 down in the first 2 1/2 mins against WIU. While the last one was lost, it would have been a lopsided loss under Stitt.

I get you like Stitt, I supported him while he was here, but I had to finally realize he was not a good head coach. This years team has a lot to work on and iron out, but they are playing way better than they would have under Stitt. With Hauck here I think they have a legitimate shot to make playoffs maybe pull out 1 victory. If Stitt was still here, no, I don’t think they would have, even with players leaving/staying or not.
Disagree - O-Line would’ve been much better under Stitt. Torres would’ve stayed, and another player that left for a medical reason may not have left. That exact blocking scheme is the reason it would’ve been better. These guys were recruited by Stitt for his offense. I happen to believe we would be 3-0 with Stitt. Of course it doesn’t really matter, and that’s just my opinion. Stitt was fine as a head coach, 98% of the schools out there would’ve renewed him.
Jes-s man, just let it go. Stitt is gone, and for very good reason.

Please explain your evidence that Torres and "another player that left for medical reasons may not have left".

And why are you so certain that "98% of schools would have renewed him". This program regressed each year of Stitt's time here, and anyone with any level of football savvy whatsoever could see that.

We all get it man. You liked Stitt. That's great, but continuing to just make shit up about what he would have done is just pointless.
User avatar
ordigger
eGriz Club
Posts: 4773
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Wandering

Raider wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:56 pm
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:39 pm
Grizzly96 wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:56 am
ordigger wrote:
Tue Sep 18, 2018 7:26 am
Griz were a playoff team with Stitt this year, but I believe Hauck is good enough for +1 for wins this year over Stitt.

Offense would be better under Stitt, but Defense and Special Teams are better under Hauck.
Have to disagree on the Stitt part. Offense would have better “stats” yes, but produce better results on the score board? No, based off past results when it mattered. Also, I think the OL issues would be even worse due to his blocking schemes in his offense. This team under Stitt would be 1-2 at this point because while Stitt is an offensive minded coach, he was not a motivator. Hauck’s ability to do this was the reason the team withstood NI’s comeback attempt in the first game, over came a sluggish first half against Drake, and came back from 14 down in the first 2 1/2 mins against WIU. While the last one was lost, it would have been a lopsided loss under Stitt.

I get you like Stitt, I supported him while he was here, but I had to finally realize he was not a good head coach. This years team has a lot to work on and iron out, but they are playing way better than they would have under Stitt. With Hauck here I think they have a legitimate shot to make playoffs maybe pull out 1 victory. If Stitt was still here, no, I don’t think they would have, even with players leaving/staying or not.
Disagree - O-Line would’ve been much better under Stitt. Torres would’ve stayed, and another player that left for a medical reason may not have left. That exact blocking scheme is the reason it would’ve been better. These guys were recruited by Stitt for his offense. I happen to believe we would be 3-0 with Stitt. Of course it doesn’t really matter, and that’s just my opinion. Stitt was fine as a head coach, 98% of the schools out there would’ve renewed him.
Jes-s man, just let it go. Stitt is gone, and for very good reason.

Please explain your evidence that Torres and "another player that left for medical reasons may not have left".

And why are you so certain that "98% of schools would have renewed him". This program regressed each year of Stitt's time here, and anyone with any level of football savvy whatsoever could see that.

We all get it man. You liked Stitt. That's great, but continuing to just make shit up about what he would have done is just pointless.
Don’t know the guy. Never met him. Of course you left off the part where I said it doesn’t matter, and it’s just my opinion. As for what few sources I have, and what little I know, that is my business.

Of course, you are stating your opinion.

Enjoy!
Post Reply