Page 1 of 4

more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:26 am
by argh!
whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!

or not? what do you think?

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
by griz98
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:19 am
by grizindabox
argh! wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:26 am
whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!

or not? what do you think?
What a whiny little man. They have verbals from 2 kids for the incoming class, hardly excessive.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
by PlayerRep
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
by AZGrizFan
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:04 am
by grizfnz
AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
It’s all about trajectory these days :thumb:

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:06 am
by mtgriz
A generalization for sure, but high school coaches want the ball in the hands of their best athletes. That’s either quarterback or wide receiver. There is one quarterback and up to four receivers on the field. Do the math. There are tons of high school wide receivers that play elsewhere in college.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:26 am
by Ursa Major
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
I heard much the same. My sources tell me that both these recruits will be put on strict strength and dietary plans to bulk up. Expect both to enter fall camp as tight end prospects. Looking forward to seeing the 5 TE formation Rosey is working on.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 am
by PlayerRep
AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
by grizindabox
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:53 am
by AllWeatherFan
Maybe we could just use Jerry Louie-McGee. :beer2:

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:15 pm
by AZDoc
grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend... :D

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:39 pm
by AZGrizFan
AZDoc wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:15 pm
grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend... :D
YOU'RE the Dr in the house. :? :?

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:41 pm
by AZGrizFan
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 am
AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
:puke:

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:51 pm
by Silenoz
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Question.

What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:33 pm
by fanofzoo
Silenoz wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:51 pm
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Question.

What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:58 pm
by BozAngelesGriz
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 am
AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really is

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:59 pm
by jodcon
grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:03 pm
by grizindabox
jodcon wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:59 pm
grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...
I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.

Re: more wide receivers

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:05 pm
by jodcon
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
And receivers tend to carry the "Athlete" designation so you never know what the real landing spot is for them, they could end up as secondary or special teams guys. Now that I've seen the LB/QB combo I'm not counting anything out.