more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:26 am
whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!
or not? what do you think?
or not? what do you think?
Montana Grizzlies • Griz Athletics
Where Griz fans come to play!
https://www.egriz.com/grizboard/
more wide receivers
Page 1 of 4
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:19 am
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:04 am
It’s all about trajectory these daysAZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:06 am
A generalization for sure, but high school coaches want the ball in the hands of their best athletes. That’s either quarterback or wide receiver. There is one quarterback and up to four receivers on the field. Do the math. There are tons of high school wide receivers that play elsewhere in college.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:26 am
I heard much the same. My sources tell me that both these recruits will be put on strict strength and dietary plans to bulk up. Expect both to enter fall camp as tight end prospects. Looking forward to seeing the 5 TE formation Rosey is working on.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 am
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:53 am
Maybe we could just use Jerry Louie-McGee. 
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:15 pm
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 amI heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:39 pm
YOU'RE the Dr in the house.AZDoc wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:15 pmany chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 amI heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:41 pm
PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 amZen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:51 pm
Question.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:33 pm
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.Silenoz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:51 pmQuestion.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:58 pm
Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really isPlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 amZen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:59 pm
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 amI heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:03 pm
I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.jodcon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:59 pmMy mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 amI heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
Re: more wide receivers
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:05 pm
And receivers tend to carry the "Athlete" designation so you never know what the real landing spot is for them, they could end up as secondary or special teams guys. Now that I've seen the LB/QB combo I'm not counting anything out.
