Always loved his energy and his athleticism. Wish him well.
That makes 9 coming back and 3 new players.
That makes 9 coming back and 3 new players.
HookedonGriz said:Always loved his energy and his athleticism. Wish him well.
That makes 9 coming back and 3 new players.
mtgrizrule said:I'm not surprised. I'm not sure, why he didn't get more minutes. It seems to me, the team had a good plus minus when he played. At worse, good things happened when he was on the court.
I wish Eddy the best. I'll miss him.
dayday said:I too loved him on the team. Can’t blame him. He has been a team player for three years. Coaching staff should have given more playing time this year. He played solid D and was the only player that could shoot worth a darn.
Ursa Major said::clap: :clap: Best of Luck, E.E.!
PlayerRep said:Under the definitions of some of you, are Egun and Falls not D-I level players (as they now play in D-II)?
If I said they were D-I players, would that cause some of you to take the other side and say they are not D-I players?
PlayerRep said:Under the definitions of some of you, are Egun and Falls not D-I level players (as they now play in D-II)?
If I said they were D-I players, would that cause some of you to take the other side and say they are not D-I players?
maroonandsilver said:PlayerRep said:Under the definitions of some of you, are Egun and Falls not D-I level players (as they now play in D-II)?
If I said they were D-I players, would that cause some of you to take the other side and say they are not D-I players?
Pretty simple. They are D-II players. They are going to schools that are D-II, in conferences that are D-II. So they are therefore D-II players. If they would have transferred to D-I schools, or if they had stayed at Montana and continued to contribute significant minutes, they would be D-I players.
Now, if they stayed at Montana, sat at the end of the bench and the coaches did not play them significant minutes because they did not trust them to contribute positively, and, for sake of argument, played only 29 minutes and scored only 14 points for the entire season, I would say they were D-II players.
PlayerRep said:maroonandsilver said:Pretty simple. They are D-II players. They are going to schools that are D-II, in conferences that are D-II. So they are therefore D-II players. If they would have transferred to D-I schools, or if they had stayed at Montana and continued to contribute significant minutes, they would be D-I players.
Now, if they stayed at Montana, sat at the end of the bench and the coaches did not play them significant minutes because they did not trust them to contribute positively, and, for sake of argument, played only 29 minutes and scored only 14 points for the entire season, I would say they were D-II players.
Just as I thought. You are clueless. There isn’t an argument that can be made that Falls is a D-II quality player. Had he made grades, he would likely have been a 4-year starter at D-I UM. Egun played a heck of a lot more than Momberg did as a frosh.
Are all the NFL players who played at D-II schools D-II quality players?
Is Walter Payton sub-D-I quality because he never played D-I?
PlayerRep said:Under the definitions of some of you, are Egun and Falls not D-I level players (as they now play in D-II)?
If I said they were D-I players, would that cause some of you to take the other side and say they are not D-I players?
LittleBear said:PlayerRep said:Under the definitions of some of you, are Egun and Falls not D-I level players (as they now play in D-II)?
If I said they were D-I players, would that cause some of you to take the other side and say they are not D-I players?
Dude stop. Let the shit go. Here you go hijacking threads again. Timmy and Eddy are 10x any player that was cut from the LG. You just won’t stop. Damn
PlayerRep said:LittleBear said:Dude stop. Let the shit go. Here you go hijacking threads again. Timmy and Eddy are 10x any player that was cut from the LG. You just won’t stop. Damn
Sorry, buddy, I'm going to post what I want. Maybe you need to hit the road. It's the internet. This isn't hijacking a thread. It's continuing a discussion. If you don't want to participate, them get out of here.
Do you think I was asking Maroon if Falls, who is now at a D-II school, is now playing at a D-II school? Maroon is the one who may be hijacking the thread, with his/her dumb ass response.
What do you provide to the board? Any information or substance? Or, are you just another big mouth who provides nothing?