more wide receivers

Get the low down on Griz/FCS Football
argh!
eGriz Club
Posts: 8117
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:20 pm

whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!

or not? what do you think?
griz98
eGriz Club
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:16 pm

So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
grizindabox
eGriz Club
Posts: 15930
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

argh! wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:26 am
whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!

or not? what do you think?
What a whiny little man. They have verbals from 2 kids for the incoming class, hardly excessive.
One of the definitions of privilege is, thinking “the system works” because it worked FOR YOU.
PlayerRep
Posts: 28050
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:06 am

griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
eGriz Club
Posts: 25940
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: Texas

PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
User avatar
grizfnz
Posts: 4135
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 8:40 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
It’s all about trajectory these days :thumb:
THE POST COUNTER IS NOT AN INTELLIGENCE METER

Image
Image
User avatar
mtgriz
eGriz Club
Posts: 2609
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: Helena

A generalization for sure, but high school coaches want the ball in the hands of their best athletes. That’s either quarterback or wide receiver. There is one quarterback and up to four receivers on the field. Do the math. There are tons of high school wide receivers that play elsewhere in college.
User avatar
Ursa Major
eGriz Club
Posts: 9325
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:53 pm

PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
I heard much the same. My sources tell me that both these recruits will be put on strict strength and dietary plans to bulk up. Expect both to enter fall camp as tight end prospects. Looking forward to seeing the 5 TE formation Rosey is working on.
Post Like A Champion!
PlayerRep
Posts: 28050
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:06 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
grizindabox
eGriz Club
Posts: 15930
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
One of the definitions of privilege is, thinking “the system works” because it worked FOR YOU.
User avatar
AllWeatherFan
eGriz Club
Posts: 10728
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:39 pm
Location: Space (Best In)

Maybe we could just use Jerry Louie-McGee. :beer2:
Turn up the Eagles, the neighbors are listening.
AZDoc
Posts: 4143
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Back in AZ

grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend... :D
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool-Bill Shakespeare
What a Fool Believes-The Doobie Brothers
User avatar
AZGrizFan
eGriz Club
Posts: 25940
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: Texas

AZDoc wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:15 pm
grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend... :D
YOU'RE the Dr in the house. :? :?
Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
eGriz Club
Posts: 25940
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: Texas

PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 am
AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
:puke:
Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
User avatar
Silenoz
Posts: 1999
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:21 pm
Location: Bozeman

PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Question.

What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
User avatar
fanofzoo
Posts: 4114
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:08 am
Location: missoula

Silenoz wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:51 pm
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Question.

What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.
User avatar
BozAngelesGriz
Posts: 547
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:43 pm

PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 am
AZGrizFan wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 am
PlayerRep wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 am
griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really is
"Stay on target"
User avatar
jodcon
eGriz Club
Posts: 5877
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:02 pm

grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...
grizindabox
eGriz Club
Posts: 15930
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

jodcon wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:59 pm
grizindabox wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...
I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.
One of the definitions of privilege is, thinking “the system works” because it worked FOR YOU.
User avatar
jodcon
eGriz Club
Posts: 5877
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:02 pm

griz98 wrote:
Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:50 am
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
And receivers tend to carry the "Athlete" designation so you never know what the real landing spot is for them, they could end up as secondary or special teams guys. Now that I've seen the LB/QB combo I'm not counting anything out.
Post Reply