argh! said:whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!
or not? what do you think?
griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
It’s all about trajectory these days :thumb:AZGrizFan said:PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
AZGrizFan said:PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
grizindabox said:I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
AZDoc said:grizindabox said:I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend...
PlayerRep said:AZGrizFan said:PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
Question.PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.Silenoz said:Question.PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
PlayerRep said:AZGrizFan said:PlayerRep said:griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.
grizindabox said:I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
jodcon said:grizindabox said:I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...
griz98 said:So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?