whine cry bitch complain.oh, wait. different coach. great gets, bobby!
or not? what do you think?
more wide receivers
-
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 16135
- Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:54 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
What a whiny little man. They have verbals from 2 kids for the incoming class, hardly excessive.
One of the definitions of privilege is, thinking “the system works” because it worked FOR YOU.
-
- Posts: 28783
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:06 am
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
- AZGrizFan
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 26522
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:34 pm
- Location: Texas
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
- grizfnz
- Posts: 4138
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 8:40 pm
It’s all about trajectory these daysAZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.

THE POST COUNTER IS NOT AN INTELLIGENCE METER




- mtgriz
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 2624
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 6:57 pm
- Location: Helena
A generalization for sure, but high school coaches want the ball in the hands of their best athletes. That’s either quarterback or wide receiver. There is one quarterback and up to four receivers on the field. Do the math. There are tons of high school wide receivers that play elsewhere in college.
- Ursa Major
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 9425
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:53 pm
I heard much the same. My sources tell me that both these recruits will be put on strict strength and dietary plans to bulk up. Expect both to enter fall camp as tight end prospects. Looking forward to seeing the 5 TE formation Rosey is working on.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Post Like A Champion!
-
- Posts: 28783
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:06 am
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
-
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 16135
- Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:54 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
One of the definitions of privilege is, thinking “the system works” because it worked FOR YOU.
- AllWeatherFan
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 10815
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:39 pm
- Location: Space (Best In)
Maybe we could just use Jerry Louie-McGee. 

Turn up the Eagles, the neighbors are listening.
-
- Posts: 4156
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Back in AZ
any chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.

A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool-Bill Shakespeare
What a Fool Believes-The Doobie Brothers
What a Fool Believes-The Doobie Brothers
- AZGrizFan
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 26522
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:34 pm
- Location: Texas
YOU'RE the Dr in the house.AZDoc wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:15 pmany chance I can get a hold of that program...asking for a friend...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.![]()


Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
- AZGrizFan
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 26522
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:34 pm
- Location: Texas
PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 amZen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.

Guns kill people like spoons make you fat.
- Silenoz
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:21 pm
- Location: Bozeman
Question.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
- fanofzoo
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:08 am
- Location: missoula
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.Silenoz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 1:51 pmQuestion.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
- BozAngelesGriz
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:43 pm
Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really isPlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:27 amZen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:58 amThat's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.PlayerRep wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:31 amIt's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
"Stay on target"
- jodcon
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 5877
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:02 pm
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
-
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 16135
- Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:54 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.jodcon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:59 pmMy mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...grizindabox wrote: ↑Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:37 am I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.
One of the definitions of privilege is, thinking “the system works” because it worked FOR YOU.
- jodcon
- eGriz Club
- Posts: 5877
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:02 pm
And receivers tend to carry the "Athlete" designation so you never know what the real landing spot is for them, they could end up as secondary or special teams guys. Now that I've seen the LB/QB combo I'm not counting anything out.