• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

more wide receivers

grizindabox said:
jodcon said:
grizindabox said:
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.

My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...

I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.

I kind of teed it up for you
 
jodcon said:
grizindabox said:
jodcon said:
grizindabox said:
I heard there was some experimental training regimen that would add 3-6 inches in length....those would make some big wide receivers.

My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...

I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.

I kind of teed it up for you

Yeah, but I draw the line at mom jokes...unless you're a real dick.
 
grizindabox said:
jodcon said:
grizindabox said:
jodcon said:
My mom said you are not an expert on length...not sure how she knows that...

I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.

I kind of teed it up for you

Yeah, but I draw the line at mom jokes...unless you're a real dick.

Thanks for putting me on the non-dick list. You know, that doesn't sound that great either...
 
jodcon said:
grizindabox said:
jodcon said:
grizindabox said:
I could respond to this in so many not so nice ways....but I won't.

I kind of teed it up for you

Yeah, but I draw the line at mom jokes...unless you're a real dick.

Thanks for putting me on the non-dick list. You know, that doesn't sound that great either...

Well, more dinners and gifts is all I can say.
 
BozAngelesGriz said:
PlayerRep said:
AZGrizFan said:
PlayerRep said:
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.

That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.

Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really is

:lol: :lol: :lol: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

POTY right there gentlemen. And, if you don't get the reference, consider yourself EXTREMELY lucky!
 
AZGrizFan said:
BozAngelesGriz said:
PlayerRep said:
AZGrizFan said:
That's what I've heard as well. 6-9 years is the anticipated transition time. #RTD...it's a journey, not a destination.

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.

Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really is

:lol: :lol: :lol: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

POTY right there gentlemen. And, if you don't get the reference, consider yourself EXTREMELY lucky!

Most people who played the game, or understand it, know what a quality loss is. The playoff selection committee understood, in their selection of teams like Northern Iowa. UM didn’t have any this year. Don’t think the Cats did either, but didn’t go back to check their schedule. Drake’s loss to Iowa St was a quality loss.

Who knows, without looking, what the city destination is in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance?
 
fanofzoo said:
Silenoz said:
PlayerRep said:
griz98 said:
So far there are two in this class; shouldn't a team have a couple in every class?

It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Question.

What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.

There is no QB
 
PlayerRep said:
AZGrizFan said:
BozAngelesGriz said:
PlayerRep said:
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is now required ready for high school football commits.

Maybe we will finally know what a “quality loss” really is

:lol: :lol: :lol: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

POTY right there gentlemen. And, if you don't get the reference, consider yourself EXTREMELY lucky!

Most people who played the game, or understand it, know what a quality loss is. The playoff selection committee understood, in their selection of teams like Northern Iowa. UM didn’t have any this year. Don’t think the Cats did either, but didn’t go back to check their schedule. Drake’s loss to Iowa St was a quality loss.

Who knows, without looking, what the city destination is in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance?

I've done a great job of blocking that entire POS from my memory. :evil: :evil:
 
Silenoz said:
fanofzoo said:
Silenoz said:
PlayerRep said:
It's my understanding that the receiver position is essentially being eliminated, now that Jensen and Stitt are gone. The goal is to keep under 5 receivers, but only ones under 6' or over 6'5". Once the receiver group is decreased in size, there will be room on the depth chart to start listing and using fullbacks. With only 1 receiver graduating this year, it may be several years before the fullbacks can be used. By then, it is expected that there will be at least 10 on the roster.
Question.

What if we just fielded 11 guys who were tight ends slash fullbacks? Like a combination? Or would that just be unfair to the rest of FCS?
I think that would be really unfair to our QB.

There is no QB

Oh yeah, duh. Better go hit it again.
 
I don’t know why the WR room gets a pass on here. Some played good at times, and got better; most did not and seemed out of place or misused.
Here’s a real hot take: if not for the failures in the WR room, Griz make the playoffs. The argument can be made that they cost us at least one game, possibly two.
 
garizzalies said:
I don’t know why the WR room gets a pass on here. Some played good at times, and got better; most did not and seemed out of place or misused.
Here’s a real hot take: if not for the failures in the WR room, Griz make the playoffs. The argument can be made that they cost us at least one game, possibly two.

Well, they get the ball (collectively) several hundred times a year, so there’s bound to be a mistake or two. Definitely know the RB position cost us one game for certain.
 
AZGrizFan said:
garizzalies said:
I don’t know why the WR room gets a pass on here. Some played good at times, and got better; most did not and seemed out of place or misused.
Here’s a real hot take: if not for the failures in the WR room, Griz make the playoffs. The argument can be made that they cost us at least one game, possibly two.

Well, they get the ball (collectively) several hundred times a year, so there’s bound to be a mistake or two. Definitely know the RB position cost us one game for certain.
Maybe. But the popular argument around here is to blame the Oline for everything, and I could see that argument for the play in your mind, but not the playS in mine
 
Maybe just maybe, we can get WR's that can all catch the ball besides JLM and Sammy. We had/have a lot of WR's titled on this team. Now we need WR's who really are WR's not only by name.
 
reinell30 said:
Maybe just maybe, we can get WR's that can all catch the ball besides JLM and Sammy. We had/have a lot of WR's titled on this team. Now we need WR's who really are WR's not only by name.

:roll: :roll:
 
garizzalies said:
AZGrizFan said:
garizzalies said:
I don’t know why the WR room gets a pass on here. Some played good at times, and got better; most did not and seemed out of place or misused.
Here’s a real hot take: if not for the failures in the WR room, Griz make the playoffs. The argument can be made that they cost us at least one game, possibly two.

Well, they get the ball (collectively) several hundred times a year, so there’s bound to be a mistake or two. Definitely know the RB position cost us one game for certain.
Maybe. But the popular argument around here is to blame the Oline for everything, and I could see that argument for the play in your mind, but not the playS in mine

:lol: :lol:

Not sure the WR's gave up the punt return for a TD. That cost us one game. Or the fumble on the goal line. That cost us another. I'm sure there's enough blame to go around. :thumb: :thumb:
 
AZGrizFan said:
garizzalies said:
AZGrizFan said:
garizzalies said:
I don’t know why the WR room gets a pass on here. Some played good at times, and got better; most did not and seemed out of place or misused.
Here’s a real hot take: if not for the failures in the WR room, Griz make the playoffs. The argument can be made that they cost us at least one game, possibly two.

Well, they get the ball (collectively) several hundred times a year, so there’s bound to be a mistake or two. Definitely know the RB position cost us one game for certain.
Maybe. But the popular argument around here is to blame the Oline for everything, and I could see that argument for the play in your mind, but not the playS in mine

:lol: :lol:

Not sure the WR's gave up the punt return for a TD. That cost us one game. Or the fumble on the goal line. That cost us another. I'm sure there's enough blame to go around. :thumb: :thumb:

This, for sure.
 
'68griz said:
AZGrizFan said:
garizzalies said:
AZGrizFan said:
Well, they get the ball (collectively) several hundred times a year, so there’s bound to be a mistake or two. Definitely know the RB position cost us one game for certain.
Maybe. But the popular argument around here is to blame the Oline for everything, and I could see that argument for the play in your mind, but not the playS in mine

:lol: :lol:

Not sure the WR's gave up the punt return for a TD. That cost us one game. Or the fumble on the goal line. That cost us another. I'm sure there's enough blame to go around. :thumb: :thumb:

This, for sure.

Both receiver fumbles were turned into touchdowns @ WIU. The punt return was offset by Flowers kick off return. But you’re right, there’s enough blame to go around.
 
Back
Top