Griz Gone Wild
Member
Can't imagine missing the playoffs and watching Nichols and Drake lay huge eggs. Really think the Aggies deserved the nod.
Yep. But both were auto-bids ... NCAA politics. The real bummer was North Carolina Central getting an at-large bid out of the MEAC. Took Richmond some time to get interested, but then they just crushed NCC. Could have been worse if the Spiders hadn't "called off the hounds."Griz Gone Wild said:Can't imagine missing the playoffs and watching Nichols and Drake lay huge eggs. Really think the Aggies deserved the nod.
Griz Gone Wild said:Can't imagine missing the playoffs and watching Nichols and Drake lay huge eggs. Really think the Aggies deserved the nod.
BadlandsGrizFan said:It will probably change next year when they seed 1-16. That will help get better teams in I feel like.
IdaGriz01 said:Yep. But both were auto-bids ... NCAA politics. The real bummer was North Carolina Central getting an at-large bid out of the MEAC. Took Richmond some time to get interested, but then they just crushed NCC. Could have been worse if the Spiders hadn't "called off the hounds."Griz Gone Wild said:Can't imagine missing the playoffs and watching Nichols and Drake lay huge eggs. Really think the Aggies deserved the nod.
AZGrizFan said:IdaGriz01 said:Yep. But both were auto-bids ... NCAA politics. The real bummer was North Carolina Central getting an at-large bid out of the MEAC. Took Richmond some time to get interested, but then they just crushed NCC. Could have been worse if the Spiders hadn't "called off the hounds."
Exactly. The soft 1-bid conferences need to NOT be autobids. There is reams and reams of evidence that they simply are of a lesser caliber than the 4 conferences still standing (BSC, MVFC, Southern, CAA). EVERY 1-bid conference is done. Gone. Just like almost every other year in history.
HelenaHandBasket said:BadlandsGrizFan said:It will probably change next year when they seed 1-16. That will help get better teams in I feel like.
It changes nothing other than taking the money component from first round home teams
HelenaHandBasket said:AZGrizFan said:Exactly. The soft 1-bid conferences need to NOT be autobids. There is reams and reams of evidence that they simply are of a lesser caliber than the 4 conferences still standing (BSC, MVFC, Southern, CAA). EVERY 1-bid conference is done. Gone. Just like almost every other year in history.
Should this be the same for the NCAA basketball tournaments, so the BSC is left out?
AZGrizFan said:HelenaHandBasket said:Should this be the same for the NCAA basketball tournaments, so the BSC is left out?
Honestly, I think it should. It’s 64 teams solely for revenue generation. Just like in football, everyone knows there’s about 8-10 teams with a legit shot, the rest are just playing out the string.
HelenaHandBasket said:AZGrizFan said:Honestly, I think it should. It’s 64 teams solely for revenue generation. Just like in football, everyone knows there’s about 8-10 teams with a legit shot, the rest are just playing out the string.
Agree to disagree. And they change to the model you suggest, it will leave the BSC out and the revenue that goes with it. And if there are only 8-10 teams that can win, why is it an issue rewarding 3-4 conferences with automatic bids that probably are with the 11-20 that cant'?
AZGrizFan said:HelenaHandBasket said:Agree to disagree. And they change to the model you suggest, it will leave the BSC out and the revenue that goes with it. And if there are only 8-10 teams that can win, why is it an issue rewarding 3-4 conferences with automatic bids that probably are with the 11-20 that cant'?
Well, I really don’t care for 66-3, 40-7 and 35-0 “playoff” football. There were other teams who weren’t selected that would have stood a fighting chance. Plus, it allows (mostly east coast) teams to pad their playoff resumes with cupcakes that shouldn’t be there.
There’s a reason why, after the “play-in” games, there’s only four conferences left. Per usual.
HelenaHandBasket said:AZGrizFan said:Well, I really don’t care for 66-3, 40-7 and 35-0 “playoff” football. There were other teams who weren’t selected that would have stood a fighting chance. Plus, it allows (mostly east coast) teams to pad their playoff resumes with cupcakes that shouldn’t be there.
There’s a reason why, after the “play-in” games, there’s only four conferences left. Per usual.
Sounds like a you problem.
AZGrizFan said:HelenaHandBasket said:Agree to disagree. And they change to the model you suggest, it will leave the BSC out and the revenue that goes with it. And if there are only 8-10 teams that can win, why is it an issue rewarding 3-4 conferences with automatic bids that probably are with the 11-20 that cant'?
Well, I really don’t care for 66-3, 40-7 and 35-0 “playoff” football. There were other teams who weren’t selected that would have stood a fighting chance. Plus, it allows (mostly east coast) teams to pad their playoff resumes with cupcakes that shouldn’t be there.
There’s a reason why, after the “play-in” games, there’s only four conferences left. Per usual.
HelenaHandBasket said:AZGrizFan said:Well, I really don’t care for 66-3, 40-7 and 35-0 “playoff” football. There were other teams who weren’t selected that would have stood a fighting chance. Plus, it allows (mostly east coast) teams to pad their playoff resumes with cupcakes that shouldn’t be there.
There’s a reason why, after the “play-in” games, there’s only four conferences left. Per usual.
I think you are pushing for a 12 team playoff...just the teams that have a chance.
HelenaHandBasket said:AZGrizFan said:Exactly. The soft 1-bid conferences need to NOT be autobids. There is reams and reams of evidence that they simply are of a lesser caliber than the 4 conferences still standing (BSC, MVFC, Southern, CAA). EVERY 1-bid conference is done. Gone. Just like almost every other year in history.
Should this be the same for the NCAA basketball tournaments, so the BSC is left out?