http://gogriz.com/index.aspx?path=football&
Looks pretty good. Maybe they'll actually start posting football info now. Wishful thinking?
Looks pretty good. Maybe they'll actually start posting football info now. Wishful thinking?
No Schmaing.Yukon said:
New look; no new information that I can see. Still no future BSC schedule 2016-9. Why would game-goers ever desire that information? UND has had it on their site for 14 months now.get'em_griz said:http://gogriz.com/index.aspx?path=football&
Looks pretty good. Maybe they'll actually start posting football info now. Wishful thinking?
kemajic said:New look; no new information that I can see. Still no future BSC schedule 2016-9. Why would game-goers ever desire that information? UND has had it on their site for 14 months now.get'em_griz said:http://gogriz.com/index.aspx?path=football&
Looks pretty good. Maybe they'll actually start posting football info now. Wishful thinking?
He's on there now. #74kemajic said:No Schmaing.Yukon said:
Griziron said:No Addison Owen or Manu Rasmussen.
mtgrizrule said:It makes no sense to have the roster updated until fall camp. At this stage, they are probably trying to decide on who to bring back when the school year starts. I'd much rather see the staff be recruiting than worrying about updates on the site.
grizd said:mtgrizrule said:It makes no sense to have the roster updated until fall camp. At this stage, they are probably trying to decide on who to bring back when the school year starts. I'd much rather see the staff be recruiting than worrying about updates on the site.
My guess is the staff updating the site isn't recruiting in the sense they are visiting recruits or watching tape. But they are recruiting based on making it look like a big time place to play. The Web presence has been a giant fail for a long time now and the department needs to give their technology more focus.
Try to catch up; this information has been available since at least May, 2014. Other programs have chosen to share it with their fans.grizindabox said:kemajic said:New look; no new information that I can see. Still no future BSC schedule 2016-9. Why would game-goers ever desire that information? UND has had it on their site for 14 months now.get'em_griz said:http://gogriz.com/index.aspx?path=football&
Looks pretty good. Maybe they'll actually start posting football info now. Wishful thinking?
Pretty difficult to post something that doesn't exist...
kemajic said:Try to catch up; this information has been available since at least May, 2014. Other programs have chosen to share it with their fans.grizindabox said:kemajic said:New look; no new information that I can see. Still no future BSC schedule 2016-9. Why would game-goers ever desire that information? UND has had it on their site for 14 months now.get'em_griz said:http://gogriz.com/index.aspx?path=football&
Looks pretty good. Maybe they'll actually start posting football info now. Wishful thinking?
Pretty difficult to post something that doesn't exist...
http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=70322&p=1060643&hilit=2016+19#p1060643
mtgrizrule said:grizd said:mtgrizrule said:It makes no sense to have the roster updated until fall camp. At this stage, they are probably trying to decide on who to bring back when the school year starts. I'd much rather see the staff be recruiting than worrying about updates on the site.
The Web presence has been a giant fail for a long time now and the department needs to give their technology more focus.
As for having a current roster up this time of the year, I am thinking that is not a high priority, nor should it have to be.
bgbigdog said:mtgrizrule said:grizd said:mtgrizrule said:It makes no sense to have the roster updated until fall camp. At this stage, they are probably trying to decide on who to bring back when the school year starts. I'd much rather see the staff be recruiting than worrying about updates on the site.
The Web presence has been a giant fail for a long time now and the department needs to give their technology more focus.
As for having a current roster up this time of the year, I am thinking that is not a high priority, nor should it have to be.
If it were a "free" content provision-type situation, I'd agree. When they made this a pay site, the expectation for the customer changes dramatically. My expectation is that they get their tech updated, organize themselves around putting out more than the minimum, or what was typically done and get back in the game.
This is a long way from riding for the brand.
Possiblly you have a reading handicap; the topic is the BSC schedules; OOC schedules have to worked around the conf. schedules, so are irrelevant to the point. These have been set in stone and have been known for over a year. What week the games will be is useful to fans making plans. Other programs help their fans with this information; UM has not. There is not a problem indicating that the gametimes are TBD or even that the date within the week is subject to change. There is no justification for the UM position on their low priority for this that I can see; certainly not your defensive explanation.grizindabox said:kemajic said:Try to catch up; this information has been available since at least May, 2014. Other programs have chosen to share it with their fans.grizindabox said:kemajic said:New look; no new information that I can see. Still no future BSC schedule 2016-9. Why would game-goers ever desire that information? UND has had it on their site for 14 months now.
Pretty difficult to post something that doesn't exist...
http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=70322&p=1060643&hilit=2016+19#p1060643
Kem, try to keep up. UM does not have completed schedules because they are still looking for non-conf games. Dates can still change until the schedule is final. The referred to link does state who the conference opponents will be, but beyond that is not concrete.
kemajic said:Possiblly you have a reading handicap; the topic is the BSC schedules; OOC schedules have to worked around the conf. schedules, so are irrelevant to the point. These have been set in stone and have been known for over a year. What week the games will be is useful to fans making plans. Other programs help their fans with this information; UM has not. There is not a problem indicating that the gametimes are TBD or even that the date within the week is subject to change. There is no justification for the UM position on their low priority for this that I can see; certainly not your defensive explanation.
Bertram said:GoGriz.com down ? Looks like it got hit with a DDoS attack