PlayerRep said:
In case anyone cares about the facts.
Stitt was given 3 years at UM. My view is that there really wasn't any "rebuilding" to do. UM was still strong when Stitt came, coming off of 2 seasons of beating Cats and making playoffs and being ranked, at nos.12 and 8 in the final polls. Looking at the last 2 season records, including no playoffs and losses to Cats, there is probably more rebuilding to be done now than when Sittt arrived.
What did Colter do? I must have missed that. Please explain.
What has "disgusted" you in the last couple months? Please explain.
A 3d year coach loses to Cats again and doesn't make playoffs again. The AD, who is faced with deciding what to do with a coach at the end of his contract and with input with big boosters, decides to make a change. The AD, again with input from some boosters, then hires one of the most successful coaches UM has ever had, if not the most successful, who is interested in returning to Montana. The process moves along fairly quickly, in part to get the coach and some assistants in place ahead of the early signing period. Almost no committed recruits are lost. Some non-committed and new recruits sign. A strong coaching staff is put in place. Much of Griz Nation is very excited. I don't understand what is "disgusting" about that.
Sorry, but your last paragraph is just plain ridiculous. Of course, you are entitled to your opinion, but so am I.
Well thanks for allowing me to have an opinion! And implying that I didn’t think you should have one...
Regarding the final paragraph, it’s absolutely ridiculous. That’s the point.
It’s the same ridiculous measuring stick that arrogant, self-important people like you used to beat Stitt over the head with from the moment he was hired over Hauck three years ago and to undermine him whenever things didn’t go well.
To be fair, I don’t know you. I’ve never met you, that I know of. I’m sure you’re a perfectly nice person in the real world, but when I read your comments I almost always end up saying or thinking to myself, “What kind of pathetic person claims to represent the Griz players?... This guy might be the most arrogant SOB on here... What kind of deranged loser has to chime in and attempt to correct people on a discussion board. Every. Single. Time...”
Your last reply is an absolutely perfect example. You repeatedly assert that “in your view” there really wasn’t any rebuilding going on. I fact you deny it was even necessary...
That statement alone undermines your credibility with me. It demonstrates that you are severely lacking objectivity...
The Griz haven’t had multiple playoff wins in a season since 2011 (and to the person who inevitably replies to clarify that the NCAA vacated those 2011 wins - piss off).
Another fun fact, the Griz have yet to get beyond the second round of the FCS playoffs since it was expanded to 24 teams.
Had it still been a 16-team playoff, it’s very likely that 2013 would have been the only playoff appearance the Griz would have had since 2011.
And that was the year they were humiliated by Coastal Carolina. A team making their first FCS playoff run. First time playing west of the Mississippi. First time playing in below freezing temperatures.
And with the Griz having three future professional linebackers playing for them that day.
It also happened to be Grergorak’s first year as a DC. Everyone seems to forget that for some reason now that say they want him back. Giving Semore time to gain experience and learn from his mistakes is too crazy to fathom for the geniuses here, but I digress.
The point is that whether you want to acknowledge it or not doesn’t mean a damn thing. There unquestionably was a need to rebuild the program.
Not because it was a losing program, but because it was stuck being pretty good program. It was complacent. Satisfied with beating the weak Bozeman teams more often than not, hosting a first round playoff game, and then losing on the road in the second round.
You know who wasn’t satisfied with that?
Bob Stitt.
He realized after his first season that the outcome of the 2015 was the ceiling for the program at that point in time.
He also realized that Gregorak, along with certain former players and influential donors were actively working against what he was trying to do. That’s what all the talk of a divided locker room was about. Honestly I don’t think it was fully unified locker room until this season. There was still division in 2016 and that’s why that team imploded in the second half of the season.
That’s what I appreciated about Stitt. He wasn’t a legacy Griz blinded by the amazing history of the program. He wasn’t stuck in the Montana football echo chamber full of people living in the past.
Stitt knew fundamental changes were necessary to begin competing with NDSUs and JMUs of the FCS world. And that was the rebuilding process he started after the 2015 season.
If you can compare the roster and staff from 2015 and 2106 and then attempt to argue that there wasn’t a rebuilding process in place, then there really isn’t anything more to be say to you because you’re delusional.
The 2016 team was a difficult season. No question about it. But the 2017 team was drastically better. Mentally they were much much stronger despite being much much younger. I was disappointed as anyone walking out of stadium in Bozeman, but I was beyond excited for next year.
There was another amazing recruiting class on the way in. The QB, who has since decommitted, was very impressive. The current class of redshirts would begin contributing along with the freshman and sophomores who saw significant time in 2017. The future was looking bright, then the program was turned upside down. By people who, at least to me, appear to be stuck in the past...
As far as Colter goes, it was his persistent negativity towards Stitt. I talked about it on this board the week leading up to NAU when he arrogantly trashes Stitt for not revealing his game plan during his weekly presser. Colter walked it back and “ate crow” the next week apparently, but he was back to trashing Stitt during Cat week.
I didn’t completely understand his blatant bias until Hauck’s first press conference. When Hauck addressed Colter like an old friend. It was pretty clear to me that he wasn’t covering the Griz as an unbiased journalist. He was actively using his platform on his website and radio to advocate against Stitt. And it worked.
Finally—what was disgusting is not the innocent fairytale you described. It was the shady politicking that was summarized quite nicely here:
http://www.abcfoxmontana.com/story/36948119/follow-the-money-who-is-influencing-ums-coach-hiring-decision
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk