Front page missoulian. Makes me feel slimy that I touched it, let alone read it.JonSnow said:Explain?
It is a journalism-free newspaper.Potomac Griz said:And of course the Missoulian is giving him the attention he craves.
The Missoulian also states in the article (when talking about Johnson) that "Multiple university proceedings found him guilty" like those matter, are object, fair and should be used to cast down on the acquittal by the actual justice system.
The Missoulian has been absolutely awful when it comes to reporting on alleged crimes over the past several years, almost always writing the story like the person is undoubtedly guilty without even attempting to get both sides of the story or be objective. I got to see a good example of that a while back when a case finally made it to trial and the accused was obviously not guilty of doing anything he was charged with (and the jury found him not guilty as well very quickly). The Missoulian however dragged his name through the mud without ever getting the other side of the story (surprise surprise!).
That newspaper is a sad example of what journalism has become today.
:lol:kemajic said:It is a journalism-free newspaper.Potomac Griz said:And of course the Missoulian is giving him the attention he craves.
The Missoulian also states in the article (when talking about Johnson) that "Multiple university proceedings found him guilty" like those matter, are object, fair and should be used to cast down on the acquittal by the actual justice system.
The Missoulian has been absolutely awful when it comes to reporting on alleged crimes over the past several years, almost always writing the story like the person is undoubtedly guilty without even attempting to get both sides of the story or be objective. I got to see a good example of that a while back when a case finally made it to trial and the accused was obviously not guilty of doing anything he was charged with (and the jury found him not guilty as well very quickly). The Missoulian however dragged his name through the mud without ever getting the other side of the story (surprise surprise!).
That newspaper is a sad example of what journalism has become today.