Eriul said:
1Griz_Fan said:
Eriul said:
I mean you could do the simple algebra yourself...
Yah in some games he could have done better but let's see.. i'll take the 5 seconds to do the algebra
(41+20+41+43+34+16+25+17)/8
So in the games he DOESN'T put up 60 he is averaging 29.625 ppg... Also very good. That's miles and miles and miles above the Hauck days im sure.
It was really a rhetorical question but thanks for showing us all that you're only here to talk down to any poster that doesn't say Stitt is an offensive genius. Did you watch the Griz when Hauck was coach? Ya Phenicie had his share of predictable offensive moments yet I bet he averaged in the thirties for most if not all his time as offensive coordinator. So that is far from miles and miles above the Hauck days. This offense isn't even miles and miles above Delaney's offenses as a whole.
I would like for Stitt to do well, just not sure it will happen unless some major changes take place. Have a good one jumping in to defend Stitt any time a poster doesn't agree he is producing great offenses. There were five out of eleven games they failed to score 30 points and three they couldn't even score more than 21 so any stats indicating the Griz had one of the top offensives in the nation are misleading. A team can dink and dunk all they want taking what the defense gives them but scoring points and winning games should matter more than piling up 600 yards of offense if that comes with only a couple scores. At least in the days when Hauck was here the team found ways to win if the offense or defense struggled. You may recall the Griz at one time considered special teams an important phase of the game but that is an entirely different topic.
Not talking down. Thought it was a serious question...
I mean there really isn't a valid argument saying he isn't very good at producing offense. You can be as biased and make whatever excuse you want. He has produced points/yards at a high rate.
I can take apart almost every part of your argument with stats but you don't want to hear those. I have no interest in arguing with someone who thinks 30 ppg is a bad average let alone 40+
http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fcs/
I recommend you spend time here.
Fair enough, we can agree to disagree then. Your argument about stats doesn't mean as much to me as it does to you when an argument can be made about all the three and outs, probably the most seen around here since the early 90's. Or how about when the offense needs a yard they move backwards. How about when the Griz needed three yards for a first down and they threw screen passes for minus 3 yards. Go for it on fourth down much and fail? Let's try that same run up the middle on first down it's gotta work sometime. Not sure if it was the playcalling or execution but something was off with this offense more than a few games this season and that to me falls on the offensive coordinator/head coach more than it does the players.
I mean any one of us can make a solid argument about how ineffective this offense was at times but you will only focus on the stats that don't reflect how this offense failed to produce yards/points when it mattered most. I'm not saying the offense sucked either, however, i would not be confident that they could get the yards/points needed in crunch time because they showed time and again that they could not. Ah well, like I said we will agree to disagree. And those stats you speak of on the link you provided do not matter to me as much as the record of the Griz and how instead of getting better as the season progressed the team regressed.
