argh! said:CatGrad-UMGradStu said:https://youtu.be/Uo-QIY7ys-k
Kind of like the necessity for "peer reviewed" bullshit...try getting that idea by your f###[#] journal editors who decide whether or not anything and everything is worthy of being published... All ten or twelve of them out there...
Now, lets talk about warp speed...how's that sitting with the journal editors?
huh? not following. i know peer review is kind of a joke. or a lot of a joke, in some fields, because it is dominated by a few. what is needed is a system where people have to show the raw data, so their manipulation and spin of it can really be analyzed. that is one reason not to trust the ccp vaccines - they didn't share any raw data, just made claims (trying to keep this on subject so it doesn't get moved, although it is looking like it will...)
Like to hear your thoughts on allowing the placebo groups to get vaccinated before finishing the studies.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
"It's a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it's the right thing to do," he says.
People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots.
Dr. Steven Goodman, a clinical trials specialist at Stanford University, says losing those control groups makes it more difficult to answer some important questions about COVID-19 vaccines.