The.Real.2506
Well-known member
CDAGRIZ said:
Your ignorance is unbelievable :thumb:
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Why
- Thread starter EverettGriz
- Start date
Your ignorance is unbelievable :thumb:
oldrunner
Well-known member
There are two ways it can be a catch. 1)player controls the ball in the field of play and continues to control the ball through contact with the ground. 2)player controls the ball in the field of play, and continues to control the ball while making a football move, generally described as taking at least one step. This can be a little subjective.
There are two ways that it can be incomplete. 1)player does not control the ball in the field of play. 2)player does control the ball in the field of play, but fails to control it through contact with the ground or through leaving the field of play.
I didn't see the play in question, but I asume it met one of those decriptions. :thumb:
There are two ways that it can be incomplete. 1)player does not control the ball in the field of play. 2)player does control the ball in the field of play, but fails to control it through contact with the ground or through leaving the field of play.
I didn't see the play in question, but I asume it met one of those decriptions. :thumb:
grizfan406
Well-known member
poorgriz said:
Perhaps they got hosed on the non calls for holding but the eags got hosed on calls for pass interference. Cats got bailed out a couple times on offense by the refs IMO.
Hoops watcher
Well-known member
BadlandsGrizFan said:
Yes, one or the other. Somehow a fumble after they played twister on the ground for a couple seconds. The ball looked loose on the way down but he reeled it in as he hit. Play is dead, catch
This conference is such a fucking joke. Anyone who supports UM staying in it is full-out bonkers.
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
EverettGriz said:
The Big Sky may be the best FCS conference this year. Some good wins over FBS teams already. Looks like some great competition coming up. The conference winner is going to have to play very well. I'm excited for the season. Anyone who doesn't like the conference and its apparent quality this year, doesn't understand the game of football.
mthoopsfan said:
Good teams in the bsc.
Wouldn’t it be great if we had leadership, fan bases, facilities and officials to match?
alabamagrizzly
Well-known member
mthoopsfan said:
Quick question from a pedestrian fan that knows little of the game. Do you have an alarm or notification that goes off every time EG posts
?mthoopsfan
Well-known member
alabamagrizzly said:mthoopsfan said:
Quick question from a pedestrian fan that knows little of the game. Do you have an alarm or notification that goes off every time EG posts
No, but I do get notices of dumb posts. Everett, you, Sask and Soldier come up a lot.
wbtfg
Well-known member
I don't know if there's definitive proof that confirms this call one way or the other. If you're a EWU (or apparently UM fan), then you think EWU got screwed and it was a terrible. If you're a MSU fan you think the officials got it right.
Because there's not a definitive shot, I think whatever was called on the field would have been upheld. I don't know if it was the right call or not, but I know that there wasn't enough evidence to overturn.
Here's what I found on how the NCAA defines a catch....I think arguments can be made to support both sides, thus why I think "the play stands" would have been the outcome regardless of the call.
-Regardless of contact from the defense, if a player hits the ground while attempting to make a catch, “he must maintain complete and continuous control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone.”
-It’s not a catch if “the player loses control of the ball while simultaneously touching the ground with any part of his body, or if there is doubt that the acts were simultaneous”. A little ball movement while the player has control doesn’t change much — even if the ball touches the ground — unless he loses that control
-“If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control and continues to maintain control, and the elements above are satisfied, it is a catch.”
Because there's not a definitive shot, I think whatever was called on the field would have been upheld. I don't know if it was the right call or not, but I know that there wasn't enough evidence to overturn.
Here's what I found on how the NCAA defines a catch....I think arguments can be made to support both sides, thus why I think "the play stands" would have been the outcome regardless of the call.
-Regardless of contact from the defense, if a player hits the ground while attempting to make a catch, “he must maintain complete and continuous control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or in the end zone.”
-It’s not a catch if “the player loses control of the ball while simultaneously touching the ground with any part of his body, or if there is doubt that the acts were simultaneous”. A little ball movement while the player has control doesn’t change much — even if the ball touches the ground — unless he loses that control
-“If the ball touches the ground after the player secures control and continues to maintain control, and the elements above are satisfied, it is a catch.”
wbtfg said:
Yeah, the call on the field is the whole point. The review is whatever, but I’m sure it took so long because they knew they fucked up the call on the field and didn’t have enough to change it. It was as much an INT as it was a punt, an avocado, and a Toyota Camry.
alabamagrizzly said:mthoopsfan said:
Quick question from a pedestrian fan that knows little of the game. Do you have an alarm or notification that goes off every time EG posts
He’s a well known stalker. Many of us have made a conscious decision to find it endearing rather than the freakin creepy it is.
wbtfg said:
Agreed. I don't think there was enough evidence to overturn it, and as I said earlier it has more to do with the half-ass review setup the BSC has. Starting to gain EPL Video Review status at this point. If they had stated it was a catch and then a fumble, I don't think its overturned either FWIW.
MrMischief
Well-known member
https://youtu.be/-LLxMaomcvomthoopsfan said:
36:49 is the start of the play, 4th and 14.
mthoopsfan said:alabamagrizzly said:Quick question from a pedestrian fan that knows little of the game. Do you have an alarm or notification that goes off every time EG posts
No, but I do get notices of dumb posts. Everett, you, Sask and Soldier come up a lot.
I just live in your pea-brain...friggin', felon-lovin' stalker. Why don't you keep my handle off your finger tips - you and all your other egriz personas.
alabamagrizzly
Well-known member
mthoopsfan said:alabamagrizzly said:Quick question from a pedestrian fan that knows little of the game. Do you have an alarm or notification that goes off every time EG posts
No, but I do get notices of dumb posts. Everett, you, Sask and Soldier come up a lot.
Solid burn. Your game is spot on today. I’m just gonna let this go in fear of the repercussions that may follow. That, and it’s a waste of time.
