garizzalies
Well-known member
Sounds like the only basis for your “improving scheme” comment is your own personal hope for change.poorgriz said:garizzalies said:So four games in and they are changing to a new defensive scheme? Do we know any specifics?
Why wouldn’t they change that meat-grinder of an O they run? At this rate, it will churn through all their RBs and QBs, I mean RBs and RBs who throw, before their big date night with ESPN.
If a team wants to run triple option, they should consider moving to the state of Kennesaw where I hear it’s always lovely—not blustery bozo!
No, not drastically changing the scheme. I think we'll pretty much always be a 4-2-5 as long as Vigen is HC. I was more referring to, Garza needs to make some adjustments to some schemes... the "keep everything in front of you, and bend but don't break" D in the current scheme is giving up WAY too many big plays, even though it's been against great passing teams. The talent is there with the secondary, and getting the two starting safeties back will help. Need to just find a way to beat a pretty good UCD team, then get a couple easy games while we work on some things and get some players back healthy, before the big showdown against Weber.
Is there any tangible evidence the bub D scheme will improve other than it can’t get any worse?