ALPHAGRIZ1 said:We don't play quality teams like that, we will get central Washington, Fort Lewis or Southern Oregon
signedbewildered said:I figured McNeese would have been glad that App St backed out. Would have been a fiasco with all three teams on the field at once.
The 26 point differential is not a "nearly 40 pt beat down."alabamagrizzly said:It was a fun expierience but if we play them again, it will be much uglier then the nearly 40 pt beat down we received.
Colorado St. - Pueblo; Stitt lost his last 4 to them; he'd probably like a shot at turning it around. Pretty risky though, the way they handled Sam Houston St. last year (a 47-21 win at Huntsville on their way to the DII NC).Spanky said:We can schedule Northern Colorado twice
kemajic said:Colorado St. - Pueblo; Stitt lost his last 4 to them; he'd probably like a shot at turning it around. Pretty risky though, the way they handled Sam Houston St. last year (a 47-21 win at Huntsville on their way to the DII NC).Spanky said:We can schedule Northern Colorado twice
get'em_griz said:alabamagrizzly said:Richmond and JMU would be nice. SE Louisianna could be good. Even Jax St, E Ken, or Chattanooga. Or we could just reschedule McNeese St. They didn't back out, the contract just couldn't be completed because if ASU's move up.
I don't understand how the ASU is the reason behind the Griz and Cowboys not following through with their package deal. Was there something in the contract that said all three teams had to play or nobody could play?
kyle_sample said:get'em_griz said:alabamagrizzly said:Richmond and JMU would be nice. SE Louisianna could be good. Even Jax St, E Ken, or Chattanooga. Or we could just reschedule McNeese St. They didn't back out, the contract just couldn't be completed because if ASU's move up.
I don't understand how the ASU is the reason behind the Griz and Cowboys not following through with their package deal. Was there something in the contract that said all three teams had to play or nobody could play?
When Bruce Hemphill was hired at McNeese two years ago, he approached Kent with the idea of canceling the agreement and Kent obliged. Kent said it benefitted both schools. I still had a long interview to transcribe, a story to write and a meeting to attend so I didn't press for further details.
He said they have had promising discussions with other schools to start a home-and-home.
The UM athletic department releasing information in a timely manner for fan planning? Surely you jest; e.g., many other BSC ADs have released their BSC schedules for 2016-19. UM has not that I am aware of. Information is power, I guess. That information could be on the BSC website, but I was not surprised that I couldn't find it; it's about as useful as gogriz.com.PlayerRep said:kyle_sample said:get'em_griz said:alabamagrizzly said:Richmond and JMU would be nice. SE Louisianna could be good. Even Jax St, E Ken, or Chattanooga. Or we could just reschedule McNeese St. They didn't back out, the contract just couldn't be completed because if ASU's move up.
I don't understand how the ASU is the reason behind the Griz and Cowboys not following through with their package deal. Was there something in the contract that said all three teams had to play or nobody could play?
When Bruce Hemphill was hired at McNeese two years ago, he approached Kent with the idea of canceling the agreement and Kent obliged. Kent said it benefitted both schools. I still had a long interview to transcribe, a story to write and a meeting to attend so I didn't press for further details.
He said they have had promising discussions with other schools to start a home-and-home.
Why would it take so long for the athletic department to release this information?