UMGriz75
Well-known member
You are exactly right. It had nothing to do with "defense," the thread topic.grizindabox said:That isn't so surprising......that you missed 420's entire point....hint.....hint.....it had nothing to do with defense......
Now, just think about that with your giant brain for a while. Then think "troll." Then think -- I know, I know, I am asking too much -- where the discussion is that shows that UM did NOT have a defense that adapted last season? AWOL?
After the start of the thread, the subject was made "Cal Poly."
BozAngelesGriz said:SoldierGriz wrote:
:twocents: Stopping the run is the single most important thing a defense must do.
I wonder if the griz d will ever get the triple option figured out
Then, holy shit, the Trolling Five hit full gear to run this up to nine pages, running around with their dresses pulled over the heads, incensed, absolutely deranged, over the following post.BWahlberg said:BozAngelesGriz wrote:
probably not since the only time we see it is against Poly.
That's all it takes: describe what actually happened, and the full force of the Remote Control Crowd takes over. Anger. Name-calling. Insults. It is laughable how a few observations take over certain heads. Bam!UMGriz75 said:Cal Poly was certainly a "run" team. Cal Poly is the first column, UM is the second.
That being said, look at the relative adjustments coming into the second half. UM's Defense obviously made the correct adjustments; no touchdowns for Cal; a very good adjustment against a "run" team. UM's Offense: flat on its face the third Q.