Noles & Griz said:
Idaho is a more convenient answer for the people who do not want to move up, they'd rather ignore the possibilities of success. That is unless those who do not want to move up think the Montana athletic department is as poor as Idaho's and will not do what it takes to be successful.
While I usually stay on the sideline with this discussion it should be pointed out that I believe Boise runs an athletic budget that's about $11,000,000 higher than the UMs. Where would we make up those costs to be at that level?
Adding more sports won't, most added sports will probably not increase revenues but decrease it.
Moving up is probably something that will have to be done at some point, but just to say, "Hey look, Boise can do it!" isn't telling the whole story. Boise did it b/c they had the financial ability to do so. We could aslo point out that Idaho, W. Kentucky, and Marshall to name a few have really had very limited success if any at all at the next level.