GGNez said:
horribilisfan8184 said:
So this is how they choose to debate GG, PR and BW? Looks like a Growler technique.
For all of you who have perhaps rolled your eyes or argued with me about my posts stating that we NEED to stop accepting and ignoring posters who bully and harass, and that people who protest Hauck are entitled to their opinions and do not deserved to be attacked, I meant it. It's true.
So, while you may have grown weary of my Liberalesque commentary, this is a response I got from a man in a personal FB message after my 2 seconds on ABC TV: "You should be ashamed to be a member of maroonblood.com Disgusting."
It was followed by threats to call my employer, turn a community of people against me,
suggested I was doing it to shame the woman whose rights I've been defending on here.
So...I guess my point is that this is so ridiculously polarized....there is no debating on facts, clearly. I support Hauck's return, so ... I'm associated with the guy I've been posting against, probably pissing off a few people on here by doing so? When did the middle ground become the minority? It's so crazy.
This. Someone commented yesterday I believe that you were "brave" for doing this and I meant to touch on that.
The reason, in my opinion, that "brave" is an accurate word describing your recent actions is because it's not politically correct to do and say what you did. There is a fine line determining who the actual victims are in this whole mess. First and foremost, anyone that was actually sexually assaulted is certainly a victim.
Then there is the other either self proclaimed or labeled by society victims. And this isn't essentially who I feel was victimized but based on recent observations of peoples wide range of reactions. Just an observation, not my opinion.
Lisa Davey
Mike Schlosser
Robert Hauck
Hauck's (especially immediate) family. Wife and children.
The Washington Family
Kent Haslam
UM Athletic department
University of Montana
UM Student Athletes
and now...
Stacy Coulter
You may or may not call yourself a victim (in reference to the message you received) GG, but others might and rightfully so (broken question mark)
How dare you question anyone that stands up against sexual assault regardless of their true agendas, false beliefs or lack of research and proven facts.
How dare you imply that the original petition was not based on accurate information.
How dare you publically support the return of this monster as a woman and an advocate for crime victims.
Yes, what you did was indeed brave for many reasons, but mostly because it goes against everything that is supposedly acceptable in todays society. How dare you.
Sidenote: (Especially in relation to this topic in general, The University of Montana and the city of Missoula) What is this middle ground you speak of?