clawman said:Regardless what party you associate with is it right for an elected official to use his position to damage a citizens reputation. IMO Testers actions were for political purposes only and to make Chucky Shumer happy.
Your thoughts?
coyote said:Demanding due diligence and vetting makes him a bad Senator? WOW
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
FYI Tester is a Montana Senator. Washington Senators are Murray and Cantwell.Ursa Major said:clawman said:Regardless what party you associate with is it right for an elected official to use his position to damage a citizens reputation. IMO Testers actions were for political purposes only and to make Chucky Shumer happy.
Your thoughts?
Don't they have a political thread on the Dead Zone board?
Screw, eagle.
Not sure they were all false. When Trump does everything over Twitter I'm not sure how else it could have been done.clawman said:coyote said:Demanding due diligence and vetting makes him a bad Senator? WOW
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Shouldn't that vetting take place "behind closed doors" not in the media, only to find out later the accusations are false?
And if it was brought up a week later and after confirmation. It would be "What's wrong with Tester, that's his job to tell us before confirmation if he heard something. Now it's to late."statler & waldorf said:It has been said that 'coyote' wrecked a government car while drunk, got so drunk he couldn't be awakened to go to work, and 20 - 30 other accusations that reflect very badly on his character, outlined here on this sheet of paper I am handing out(McCarthy-esque, eh?).None of the accusations have been verified, but we will have public hearings to make sure we are transparent in our persecution, I mean prosecution, of this matter. Of course, we will publish his real name and other personal data as consistent with transparency.
Now, does that help put everything into perspective?
As Brit Hume said tonight, what Tester did is "a form of character assassination."
He is most definately one of the reasons!Hells bells said:I think tester is the reason why we should have term limits in congress...
clawman said:Regardless what party you associate with is it right for an elected official to use his position to damage a citizens reputation. IMO Testers actions were for political purposes only and to make Chucky Shumer happy.
Your thoughts?
spsyk said:clawman said:Regardless what party you associate with is it right for an elected official to use his position to damage a citizens reputation. IMO Testers actions were for political purposes only and to make Chucky Shumer happy.
Your thoughts?
That is what progressives do, “Rules for Radicals” their playbook.
Sam A. Blitz said:Never been a huge Tester fan, but Jackson was in absolutely no way qualified to run the VA. He has no experience managing an organization like that. Very little management experience at all.
I'd like anyone on here to give a formidable argument stating that Jackson was qualified. Trump nominated him because he was very complimentary and loyal to Trump. Loyalty is a good quality, but it does not make up for lack of experience or credibility. I could care less if the accusations were true or not, he should have never been nominated. Period.