zengriz said:...ya think...
... :shock: ...
Glendivegriz said:Go read the Constitution moron. Nothing for impeachment. Geez, do we even teach government in elementary school anymore.
reinell30 said:zengriz said:...ya think...
... :shock: ...
With all your resentment of our President, just who is it you think could/would do a better job after 100 days? After all, every democrat is fighting him tooth and nail, no matter what he does.
What is it you want you aren't getting?
Glendivegriz said:Go read the Constitution moron. Nothing for impeachment. Geez, do we even teach government in elementary school anymore.
Fat Bruno said:Glendivegriz said:Go read the Constitution moron. Nothing for impeachment. Geez, do we even teach government in elementary school anymore.
If we do, you missed the class. Obstruction of justice is the most current reason. Then there's gross incompetence. Read David Brooks latest piece on his "infantilism."
reinell30 said:zengriz said:...ya think...
... :shock: ...
With all your resentment of our President, just who is it you think could/would do a better job after 100 days? After all, every democrat is fighting him tooth and nail, no matter what he does.
What is it you want you aren't getting?
Glendivegriz said:Fat Bruno said:Glendivegriz said:Go read the Constitution moron. Nothing for impeachment. Geez, do we even teach government in elementary school anymore.
If we do, you missed the class. Obstruction of justice is the most current reason. Then there's gross incompetence. Read David Brooks latest piece on his "infantilism."
Oh please enlighten us? Lol. Do you not understand that if Trump committed a crime, Comey didn't report or investigate which is also Obstruction and makes him accountable for Trumps alleged Obstruction? Whereby, Comey could not be compelled to testify about it because of the 5th amendment. He would have to be given immunity which then would make his testimony less than credible. Furthermore, Comey would have committed Official Misconduct. He would then likely lose his pension and benefits. Beyond that, it's a good story.
EverettGriz said:reinell30 said:zengriz said:...ya think...
... :shock: ...
With all your resentment of our President, just who is it you think could/would do a better job after 100 days? After all, every democrat is fighting him tooth and nail, no matter what he does.
What is it you want you aren't getting?
30, I'm honestly interested in your reply, here, because I find the argument that Trump's failures are due to Democratic obstructionism fascinating. To most if not all independent thinkers, the debacle that is the first 120 days are due nearly entirely to unforced errors of the president's own doing.
It seems a little far-fetched to me that the Dems are obstructing much when the R's control all 3 branches. The only obstruction they could seemingly muster was against Gorsuch's nomination, and in that instance the R's simply changed the rules, took their ball, and went home. I'm curious what you feel would be different/better if the Dems were not obstructing?
EverettGriz said:Okay, but those legislative wishes are not being denied by the Dems. In most cases, there hasn't even been legislative action drawn up to move those promises forward. Yes, health care has been ripped. We can argue whether that's correct or not until we're blue, but after seven years of hearing about repealing and replacing with something spectacular, most of us expected more. We didn't expect that 24 million Americans would lose coverage, and that a vote would take place before the OMB gave cost estimates. Regarding unfilled positions, the vast majority of government posts not yet filled do not even require Senate approval.
And you're correct. Trump ran on and won because he's not a politician. But I would argue that that is precisely his problem. He doesn't know how to run the government. You cannot have it both ways: you can't say you don't want a career politician, and then blame the failures when that person doesn't know how to steward the business of government forward on others. Look, I fully expect that Trump will get stonewalled wherever possible by Dems, in part because he's used up so much credibility fighting about shit that doesn't matter (e.g. the size of his Inauguration crowd). But I don't think one can argue that's the problem at this point. The problem is the West Wing is in complete disarray.
EverettGriz said:Glendivegriz said:Fat Bruno said:Glendivegriz said:Go read the Constitution moron. Nothing for impeachment. Geez, do we even teach government in elementary school anymore.
If we do, you missed the class. Obstruction of justice is the most current reason. Then there's gross incompetence. Read David Brooks latest piece on his "infantilism."
Oh please enlighten us? Lol. Do you not understand that if Trump committed a crime, Comey didn't report or investigate which is also Obstruction and makes him accountable for Trumps alleged Obstruction? Whereby, Comey could not be compelled to testify about it because of the 5th amendment. He would have to be given immunity which then would make his testimony less than credible. Furthermore, Comey would have committed Official Misconduct. He would then likely lose his pension and benefits. Beyond that, it's a good story.
Again, very interested in a reply here, too, because this argument fascinates me. Are you suggesting that Comey was not investigating after Trump's alleged comment to him?
Glendivegriz said:EverettGriz said:Glendivegriz said:Fat Bruno said:If we do, you missed the class. Obstruction of justice is the most current reason. Then there's gross incompetence. Read David Brooks latest piece on his "infantilism."
Oh please enlighten us? Lol. Do you not understand that if Trump committed a crime, Comey didn't report or investigate which is also Obstruction and makes him accountable for Trumps alleged Obstruction? Whereby, Comey could not be compelled to testify about it because of the 5th amendment. He would have to be given immunity which then would make his testimony less than credible. Furthermore, Comey would have committed Official Misconduct. He would then likely lose his pension and benefits. Beyond that, it's a good story.
Again, very interested in a reply here, too, because this argument fascinates me. Are you suggesting that Comey was not investigating after Trump's alleged comment to him?
Comey under the U.S. code had a duty to immediately report it if he felt it was a crime. Inaction makes him culpable as well. His May 3 testimony under oath states that no one had tried to influence him on the investigation which would also open him up for perjury. This is a big fat nothing if self preservation is an instinct Comey possesses.
It is equally interesting to note that suddenly Pelosi and some of the top Dems. have gotten off the impeachment bandwagon. The special counsel situation is a double edge sword. Being tasked to look into the Russian influence reopens the DNC email and Hillary server mess. Which leads us back to Podesta's relation with Russian banks and Bill's meeting with Loretta Lynch. Questions of why did the DNC refuse the FBI to examine their servers and was Seth Rich really the leaker as Assange has drawn attention to? This may be a situation of careful what you wish for.
AllWeatherFan said:It's easy to criticize Congressmen and Congresswomen from states in which you cannot vote. Congress is a perfect reflection of the American people, who cannot and will not agree on anything. People want simple answers to complex problems. They elect people who hate government to run government. We get what we deserve. Trump's greatest success will be to teach us not to be suckers for carnival barkers and their sales pitches. Religion and politics don't blend into good policy. The only place you can find good policy is in the center, not in the fringes. I'll take John McCain over Ted Cruz and Mike Pence any day, but I'll take Tip O'Neill over John McCain. Here's an idea. Let's evolve.