gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.
CDAGRIZ said:gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.
What f***[*] thread did you just read?
gobison said:CDAGRIZ said:gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.
What f***[*] thread did you just read?
The original posters comments, half of the game thread, etc......
"Beatable" seems the term being thrown around a lot. Kind of funny, because you didn't beat us, until someone does, then we aren't "beatable".
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :roll:JohnnyExtacy said:NDSU struggled a bit. Penalties are incredibly stupid and could bite them in the butt down the road, and they better iron put their passing game.
I was a little suprised at how ineffective Montana is on offense.
I was also a bit surprised at how bad Montana' dline got blown off the ball by NDSU.
NDSU is probably a top 10-25 ranked team, and Montana shouldn't even be ranked.
gobison said:CDAGRIZ said:gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.
What f***[*] thread did you just read?
The original posters comments, half of the game thread, etc......
"Beatable" seems the term being thrown around a lot. Kind of funny, because you didn't beat us, until someone does, then we aren't "beatable".
CDAGRIZ said:gobison said:CDAGRIZ said:gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.
What f***[*] thread did you just read?
The original posters comments, half of the game thread, etc......
"Beatable" seems the term being thrown around a lot. Kind of funny, because you didn't beat us, until someone does, then we aren't "beatable".
So, let me get this straight. Admitting that the Griz have huge issues and saying that the Bizon look beatable makes MOST of the posters on eGriz sound like cry babies?
Also, rad logic. I'm using it. To wit, my wife says that our martini glasses are "breakable." Since none of them have broken, she is wrong.
2011BisonAlumni said:gobison,
Get the f*ck off of this site. People like you and Lakes make us look like the biggest POS fanbase in the world.
gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.
Bison fan in NW MN said:Blgs Griz Fan said:If I were an NDSU BiSon fan I would be seriously concerned about the inability to score touchdowns in the red zone. That was beyond abysmal. Granted the Griz have one of the best defenses in all of the FCS but NDSU really looked lame. It seems their run game is only effective if there is a threat to throw. The red zone takes away some of that threat.
The BiSon's only touchdown was on a broken play.
I would grade NDSU's performance as a B- with extra credit points being given for penalties not being called.
Yes, the red zone scoring needs to improve but I would give the Griz defense some credit for this yesterday. Some of the play calls by the Bison OC were head scratchers but the Griz defense made some good plays also.
Bison looked "lame?" If "lame" is rushing for 280 yards, having a 2-1 TOP advantage, 24-9 1st down advantage and holding your opponent scoreless in the 2nd half.....I'll take it!! :thumb:
The power west-coast offense isn't "flashing" but the Bison do a good job of running it.
JayLarson said:Our defense held NDSU to field goals that is true, but they only forced 1 punt all day, and were dominated as NDSU moved the ball at will, especially after half time. I am not going to say that we have as great of defense as many of you are. NDSU was the first decent offense we have faced and they racked up a ton of yards, and we have yet to face a true passing team this season, when NDSU went to the pass they had no trouble at all moving the chains, and they always had their receivers wide open.
AZGrizFan said:Bison fan in NW MN said:Blgs Griz Fan said:If I were an NDSU BiSon fan I would be seriously concerned about the inability to score touchdowns in the red zone. That was beyond abysmal. Granted the Griz have one of the best defenses in all of the FCS but NDSU really looked lame. It seems their run game is only effective if there is a threat to throw. The red zone takes away some of that threat.
The BiSon's only touchdown was on a broken play.
I would grade NDSU's performance as a B- with extra credit points being given for penalties not being called.
Yes, the red zone scoring needs to improve but I would give the Griz defense some credit for this yesterday. Some of the play calls by the Bison OC were head scratchers but the Griz defense made some good plays also.
Bison looked "lame?" If "lame" is rushing for 280 yards, having a 2-1 TOP advantage, 24-9 1st down advantage and holding your opponent scoreless in the 2nd half.....I'll take it!! :thumb:
The power west-coast offense isn't "flashing" but the Bison do a good job of running it.
And despite all those flashy stats, if not for an INT in the end zone it's a 19-17 game with 5 minutes left. Stats don't mean shit and don't tell the story. with stats like that, I'd be significantly worried as a Bison fan that the score wasn't 45-10 and not 22-10.
grizindabox said:AZGrizFan said:Bison fan in NW MN said:Blgs Griz Fan said:If I were an NDSU BiSon fan I would be seriously concerned about the inability to score touchdowns in the red zone. That was beyond abysmal. Granted the Griz have one of the best defenses in all of the FCS but NDSU really looked lame. It seems their run game is only effective if there is a threat to throw. The red zone takes away some of that threat.
The BiSon's only touchdown was on a broken play.
I would grade NDSU's performance as a B- with extra credit points being given for penalties not being called.
Yes, the red zone scoring needs to improve but I would give the Griz defense some credit for this yesterday. Some of the play calls by the Bison OC were head scratchers but the Griz defense made some good plays also.
Bison looked "lame?" If "lame" is rushing for 280 yards, having a 2-1 TOP advantage, 24-9 1st down advantage and holding your opponent scoreless in the 2nd half.....I'll take it!! :thumb:
The power west-coast offense isn't "flashing" but the Bison do a good job of running it.
And despite all those flashy stats, if not for an INT in the end zone it's a 19-17 game with 5 minutes left. Stats don't mean shit and don't tell the story. with stats like that, I'd be significantly worried as a Bison fan that the score wasn't 45-10 and not 22-10.
You can probably use the same type of statement for the Griz...happy it was 22-10 and not 45-10.
AZGrizFan said:NDSU punted twice, and turned it over on downs once.
JayLarson said:AZGrizFan said:NDSU punted twice, and turned it over on downs once.
Thanks for the correction, that turnover on downs was absolutely huge by the defense, stopping NDSU on 3rd and 2, and 4th and less than 1. I bet that does not happen more than once or twice a season to power running NDSU.
AZGrizFan said:Bison fan in NW MN said:Blgs Griz Fan said:If I were an NDSU BiSon fan I would be seriously concerned about the inability to score touchdowns in the red zone. That was beyond abysmal. Granted the Griz have one of the best defenses in all of the FCS but NDSU really looked lame. It seems their run game is only effective if there is a threat to throw. The red zone takes away some of that threat.
The BiSon's only touchdown was on a broken play.
I would grade NDSU's performance as a B- with extra credit points being given for penalties not being called.
Yes, the red zone scoring needs to improve but I would give the Griz defense some credit for this yesterday. Some of the play calls by the Bison OC were head scratchers but the Griz defense made some good plays also.
Bison looked "lame?" If "lame" is rushing for 280 yards, having a 2-1 TOP advantage, 24-9 1st down advantage and holding your opponent scoreless in the 2nd half.....I'll take it!! :thumb:
The power west-coast offense isn't "flashing" but the Bison do a good job of running it.
And despite all those flashy stats, if not for an INT in the end zone it's a 19-17 game with 5 minutes left. Stats don't mean shit and don't tell the story. with stats like that, I'd be significantly worried as a Bison fan that the score wasn't 45-10 and not 22-10.
Blgs Griz Fan said:If I were an NDSU BiSon fan I would be seriously concerned about the inability to score touchdowns in the red zone. That was beyond abysmal. Granted the Griz have one of the best defenses in all of the FCS but NDSU really looked lame. It seems their run game is only effective if there is a threat to throw. The red zone takes away some of that threat.
The BiSon's only touchdown was on a broken play.
I would grade NDSU's performance as a B- with extra credit points being given for penalties not being called.
gobison said:For being such a "class program" and bragging about winning and losing with class most of the posters over here sound like little cry babies.