crackgina said:tnt said:There is little difference between "perponderance of evidence" and "most likley scenario" the dear colleague letter is addressing prevention as much as anything, and making sure the "environment" is non discriminatory. Its how it is in the real world, might just as well get used to it. Sexual harrasement in ANY measure can (and often will) lead to immediate dismissal. It could be as simple as a social date between a supervisor and subordinate or even a "dirty joke"
Big difference between losing a job and be denied an education moron. Additionally, the decision will brand the losing party for life. I don't know why anyone would discount the importance of this PC bullshit.
Apparently they don't teach you much about sexual harassment down at the car wash. The "real world" consequences are for more severe than "losing a job" Expulsion is very rare, but certainly a possibility. As far as being denied an education maybe for a common guy, but for good ball player, there will always be a Bobby Hauck out there willing to give them a second chance.