Please, please can the two of you just knock it off. I’m sure I’m not the only one who is sick of it.
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Egriz - Overreaction Nation
- Thread starter SoldierGriz
- Start date
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
ChesterGriz said:
I agree with you. Soldier needs to knock it off. If you want it knocked off, you need to get him from saying things that are not true (and are completely contrary to what the coaches are saying). It is not my nature to let someone consistently bash the team unfairly when I know he is wrong. Most of what I am saying is backed up by the views of the coaches, and others in the know.
When I said the two of you, I meant it.
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
ChesterGriz said:
Well, rest assured that I am not going to listen to you.
What a shock. I’m sure it you say that to everyone.
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
ChesterGriz said:
Have you ever contributed anything of note to the board? Just asking. I don't recall.
garizzalies
Well-known member
We? Not paying attention? Nobody knows what the heck you are talking about because, contrary to your conflations, you have no “facts” to support yourSoldierGriz said:
. Just a few months ago, you were campaigning for Germer’s head (for no apparent reason), and so far this year you graded the Oline C+ and now up to a “solid B”.
The worst part isn’t that you would fire someone because s/he “has not been exceptional“, it’s that you have no factual basis for your overreaction.
And don’t take the bet. I am not PR, or this new guy, Hoops, who is quite funny, BTW. Ha. We all know this but here, I’ll prove it again: :flash:
PR is way too classy and has never and would never stoop so low as to post an emoji or meme. Now that’s a real “fact”.
WaGriz4life
Well-known member
Yes there is. Nearly every fan base in the countrySoldierGriz said:
mthoopsfan said:
I would say 2 things…1 is the coaches and they won’t publicly say they sucked. They’d sugar coat it some. Like, we need to work on things. They would be honest, but put a twist on it as coaches do. I thought likely was a B- game 1. Especially against that team. But, taking into account they need to play together. Thing 2…I imagine some on here for whatever reason are harsh graders. Maybe they played or coached the position. In their mind they hope for As and see less than stellar play. I imagine you critique DBs a bit better than I since you played there. I played RB and LB, so I critique them a bit differently. I’m awful with RBs.
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
Coaches don’t sugarcoat grades given to players.
Hauck doesn’t sugarcoat to QB Club or to his friends.
Hauck doesn’t sugarcoat to QB Club or to his friends.
AZGrizFan said:
:thumb:
ChesterGriz said:
The original post simply poked fun at all of us at times...sorry it got derailed.
garizzalies
Well-known member
Damn straight. Please feel free to volunteer your reasoning. I gave you multiple opportunities in the other thread and specifically invited this info from you but got nothing except crickets. Same thing again. Here’s your chance…..SoldierGriz said:
Put up or shut up
garizzalies said:
You mean besides the fact the O-line has been the weak link on the team for years, there’s been very little development of recruits, four consecutive HS recruiting classes that failed to produce a single starter before this year, the 33 sacks given up last year, the high dependence on transfers due to O-line recruiting washouts….you mean other than THAT reasoning?
I love me some Bobby Hauck, and love where he’s got this team headed, but he has a blind spot for Germer and his abilities, much like his blind spot in refusing to EVER take Robbie off the field, even if it would be for his own (and the team’s) good.
garizzalies
Well-known member
I was hoping for actual facts, not your personal opinions gleaned from a grainy screen over 1000 miles away. Weakest link? That’s just like your opinion, man.AZGrizFan said:
Hoops has provided real-live links showing in black and white the Oline is doing great, with support directly from the horse’s mouth. Guess you prefer info from the other end of the horse.
Got a link you can post showing facts to support your opinions?
garizzalies
Well-known member
You used deductive reasoning. That’s when you start with a theory and backfill it with random tidbits to support whatever conclusion you want. In this context, the “facts” you deduced are meaningless, unrelated, and therefore not really facts at all for this topic.AZGrizFan said:
Please try again but this time use inductive reasoning, like Hoops. In other words, try starting with facts and not a predetermined (and what appears to be prejudiced) outcome. Thx.
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
AZGrizFan said:
Except the o-line has not been a weak link for years, Germer is a terrific coach, and UM has recruited well enough to have a credible, and this year, good o-line. Recruiting is no longer bringing in frosh out of high school. It's very much getting drop downs, with either experience or large potential. A high number of transfers is necessary and has become intentional. I have no complaint about the 3 starters this year.
As for sacks, yes, too many. However, not as many against the tougher opponents. So, while high for the season, better in tougher games, and before backups were in.
UW - 1
EWU - 3, 3
Sac - 4 (loss)
So Utah - 2
MSU - 5 (in a blowout win)
JMU - 2
Robbie is a great tackler and gets a huge number of tackles. Who would you play in his place? Also, how many passing TD's have Robbie given up this season?
4 against Dixie. 5 against NC, in a 35-0 game.
mthoopsfan
Well-known member
garizzalies said:
His main source is Soldier.