CDAGRIZ said:
77matcat said:
1972 indicated in post #72 that he/she believed making a DC change after the PSU game was a good thing. I simply questioned that statement. Was trying to find some logic for statement and had to start asking ?s.
Oh, well it's pretty simple. The defense seemed to play better after. The team certainly seemed to play better after. There you go!
I see what's going on now. The Cats got the guy rumored to have been divested of his DC duties mid-season, and you want to try to argue the D didn't get better afterward. Sorry it took me so long to see your agenda!
Pretty defensive aren't we.
No agenda. No argument. Just trying to make sense of the quarter back and supposed coaching changes impact on the defense production.
Think Gregorack (sp) could be light years better than Marshall but not sure that's something to brag about.
Just trying to get a few data points. I'll take into consideration it could be biased.