grizindabox said:
So 75......what exactly was.....my expectations.....for last year.....
I'm reasonably certain that, if anybody cared, you would have told them that Coach Stitt was
1) going to blame certain elements of the team for its crappy attitude;
2) going into games already defeated,
3) that the string of losses was all his fault,
4) that the team needed a "counselor" to come in to deal with "team problems,"
5) that moral had collapsed,
6) that the Division 2 Executive coaches were disrespected by the career Division 1 assistants,
7) that the Head Coach needed to take the post-season and re-think his approach,
8) that the team was as united as ever and had more unity than any team in the past 20 years,
9) that he (Stitt) had screwed it up,
10) that "it" must have been the Quarterback's fault.
But, since no one cared what you thought, that record was not developed further except by your endless congratulations of yourself.
I don't think I've ever seen a coach go through so many permutations of "blame" in a season as Coach Stitt, even as after each new defeat, there was a new all-encompassing blame. Remarkably, these escalating variations of blame became contradictory and parody. He has, in fact, done what I have never seen before: he has publicly blamed everyone and everything. If there is a cogent analysis of "what went wrong" you're not going to get it from this Coach until somebody nails his foot to the floor.
Lesson learned?
Well, we will see, won't we?
The plus side is "it can't get worse." The question is, can it improve enough based on the developed record? Stitt really, really wants to be personally in charge of this offense. Based on developed record, would you defend the risk?