Robsnotes4u
Well-known member
ranco said:monte is a character said:Interesting that virtually nobody addressed my formula for returning UM to a dominating program. Instead, they digressed into a pissing contest about what makes a program elite. Our program is only elite in the minds of the fans living in the past. We have won two playoff games in the past 5 years. And that is elite???? Hell, we can't even win the conference outright any longer! :roll:
My formula for returning us to an elite program who dominates the Big Sky, makes the playoffs every year, goes deep into the playoffs on a regular basis, and plays in the NC game at least once every five years or so, is contained in the first post to start this thread.
I feel very confident that, if these suggestions were implemented, we would be a much stronger program three years from now than if we keep the current coaching staff in place. No question about that fact in my mind.
your plan looks like it was thought up by an imbecile, might be one reason no one addressed.
That is an intelligent rebuttal. Show some fortitude, place your plan out there to be judged.
You did seem to read the thread, not commenting on his first post, waiting as you didn't want to be the only person to feel that way. That tells me you are afraid to be a leader with your ideas. Instead, you are a person that jumps on the bandwagon waiting for someone to make the leap first.
You should read the quote below, and learn how intelligent people discuss things.
NativeGriz said:I don't entirely agree. I feel we are already an elite program, though maybe not the dominant football team we had in the past. But since we are an elite program, it will not take as much to get us back to dominance.
1Delaney-I never felt he was the right fit, but he has done an ok job.
2 National search, I agree I feel it would be big mistake to hire from within
3 keep 3 coaches-Don't agree-leave that up to next coach.
4 agree
5. agree and disagree. Some things are already good.
6. No opinion.