• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Streaker to be suspended or expelled (if he's a student)

Blue Tears said:
Alphie,

I know you are just being yourself, but do you realize that by your definition, many of the Griz football players are apparently pussy products from public schools.


Just because you play football doesnt make you tough..............look at the most of the kids that play football in Missoula if you dont believe me.
 
grizwinitall said:
I think people should call the county attorneys office Monday and demand that they prosecute him to the full extent.... i feel things like that are a disgrace in our town and to our university. I am glad my kids werent with me at the game


I hate to break it to you but the guy did not even get arrested. He was only cited and released for a misdemeanor. He was never booked at the county jail. In the end this will be a slap on the wrist type of crime if he has no criminal history. He will pay some court fee's and fines and that's, that. The county attorney will never see this case.

Montana Code - 45-8-101 — Disorderly conduct

45-8-101. Disorderly conduct. (1) A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if he knowingly disturbs the peace by:
(a) quarreling, challenging to fight, or fighting;
(b) making loud or unusual noises;
(c) using threatening, profane, or abusive language;
(d) discharging firearms, except at a shooting range during established hours of operation;
(e) rendering vehicular or pedestrian traffic impassable;
(f) rendering the free ingress or egress to public or private places impassable;
(g) disturbing or disrupting any lawful assembly or public meeting;
(h) transmitting a false report or warning of a fire or other catastrophe in such a place that its occurrence would endanger human life;
(i) creating a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that serves no legitimate purpose; or
(j) transmitting a false report or warning of an impending explosion in such a place that its occurrence would endanger human life.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (3), a person convicted of the offense of disorderly conduct shall be fined not to exceed $100 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 10 days, or both.
(3) A person convicted of a violation of subsection (1)(j) shall be fined not to exceed $1,000 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 1 year, or both.

However where he might pay big is at the U, where he could be expelled for violating the student code of conduct policy.
 
grizfan95 said:
This...thread...is...useless. Anyone got something useful to say about Griz football? Perhaps how the Griz secondary is going to fair this weekend against a team that throws it 60+ times a game? Although EWU and Tennessee have completely different caliber receivers it still has gotta leave some fans wondering how the secondary is going to do on this test. The blitz and D-line will be a deal breaker. I'm looking forward to revenge and sticking them on the bus oh and 3.

You could start a thread and wonder these things and I bet you'd get some responses. :twocents:
 
Blue Tears said:
Whether you are naked in a stadium with kids, on a playground with kids or at Wal-Mart with kids, the common theme is you are naked with kids being present. I fail to see how they are different. The public indecency law is just that, for PUBLIC places. If you want to run around naked in your yard, go for it. If you want to let your kids watch shows with nudity, I guess that is your pergative as well. But, if you are naked in a public place and have exposed yourself to kids, this is not ok. If you and your daughter are ok with public nudity, I have no problem with that. That is your right. If it was just me at the game, the nudity wouldn't bother me either. It isn't ok though for someone to decide that kids are going to see a naked man whether they or their parents want to see him or not.

You stuffy uppity ups need to lighten up. I thought it was hilarious and really wouldn't have cared if I had kids with me at the game.
 
I agree that there are certainly worse things for kids to see and hopefully they don't have to experience those that are. I get a kick out of nudity as much as anyone, but a time and place exists for things and I would prefer for it not to be around my kids at a football game when they are so young. There is plenty of time for that stuff when they get older. I'm not saying the kid should be thrown in jail and the key thrown away, but he should suffer the consequences outlined by law. And for Alphie, how about all of our fighting men and women of our military who graduated fromn public schools. Is the sacrafice they make enough to be considered tough by you? I guess people who have good qualities get them in spite of the crazy treachings of our whacky public school system. Did you attend public schools? You must have learned your uncanny ability to stir the pot from somewhere.
 
Blue Tears said:
I agree that there are certainly worse things for kids to see and hopefully they don't have to experience those that are.

We take our kids to a sporting event where we cheer wildly when a player from the other team gets knocked cold by one of our DBs.

I think the "worse things" train left the station long ago.

I can understand a person being upset if the streaker is messing up the team by delaying the game ... and maybe even that they are simply bringing attention to themselves by trespassing on the field ... but the fact that they are naked just isn't something that I'm the least bit worried about with my kid. It's a teaching moment ... as in, "You probably shouldn't run around naked in public when you grow up because it would really hurt to get a rug burn on your Johnson when the cops tackle you!" ;)
 
Hammer,

I am originally from Butte, so have seen some crazy things growing up, just as I am sure you have. I get a kick out of you on this board and usually agree and appreciate with your posts. On this topic, I just disgaree. I am defintely not an old stuffy person, I just prefer that in public places people have respect for others, especially kids. If you don"t mind your kids seeing that, that is ok with me. That is your choice. I just would prefer that mine don't when they are so young. Not considering my kids, all the streaker did for me was interrupt the game. Maybe I am getting old.
 
Bay Area Cat said:
Blue Tears said:
I agree that there are certainly worse things for kids to see and hopefully they don't have to experience those that are.

We take our kids to a sporting event where we cheer wildly when a player from the other team gets knocked cold by one of our DBs.

I think the "worse things" train left the station long ago.

I can understand a person being upset if the streaker is messing up the team by delaying the game ... and maybe even that they are simply bringing attention to themselves by trespassing on the field ... but the fact that they are naked just isn't something that I'm the least bit worried about with my kid. It's a teaching moment ... as in, "You probably shouldn't run around naked in public when you grow up because it would really hurt to get a rug burn on your Johnson when the cops tackle you!" ;)

Except for one is perfectally legal and the other is perfectly illegal. But, I do agree that if that was the worst thing to see, that things would be good.
 
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
This country is so doomed with generations of pussy kids most parents and the public school system are cranking out now days.

That is what should be illegal.

+1 :clap: :clap: :clap:
 
Instead of complaining about it, become a teacher or volunteer with Big Brothers and Sisters so that you can make an impact on kids. I think you would be surprised with how many great kids we have these days who are just looking for some guidance.
 
Jaredkuehn said:
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
This country is so doomed with generations of pussy kids most parents and the public school system are cranking out now days.

That is what should be illegal.

+1 :clap: :clap: :clap:

+1 more. :clap:
 
Blue Tears said:
Let me ask all of you who think this is a funny prank, would it be ok for a person to go onto a school playground and expose himself or herself to a group of kids? Yesterday, the steaker did just that to every child in Washington Grizzly Stadium. Even though that may not have been his objective, the effect is the same. In what was most likely a drunken haze, he obviously didn't think it through. For his thoughtless actions, he should be in a heap of trouble. Aside from that, it is moronic behavior. All it does is distract from the game.
you are right, it distracts from the game, but I suspect your kids are going to see much worse than a drunk college kid running around naked for his moments of shame...Growing up in Butte, during a time of labor strife and poverty and high alcoholism I saw much worse than a kid with no taste. And, I saw many more streakers in the 70s...Actually, your kids probably couldn't get home fast enough to tell their friends who were kept from watching it on TV....By the way, there is far more to worry about today than that...Frankly, I am concerned about EWU showing up in Missoula and the Griz not able to handle the long pass....
 
My kids are only 3 and 5 so they weren't calling friends, but my youngest kept referring to the naked boy on the way home from the game. At my age and where I grew up, seeing a streaker is small potatoes. I would just rather my kids not see that until they are older, but that obviously isn't going to happen. Oh well... You are right about Butte, it was definitely a unique (but great) place to grow up. I also share your concern about Bo Levi Mitchell lighting up the scoreboard. I have a feeling though the Griz will be ready come Saturday.
 
somewhere Jim O'day is trying to find a way to sponsor the next streaker. it was the only thing yesterday that wasnt paid for.
 
Big One 25 said:
somewhere Jim O'day is trying to find a way to sponsor the next streaker. it was the only thing yesterday that wasnt paid for.
I thought it was sponsored by these guys:
FAF_family2.jpg


Sent from my HTC Thunderbolt
 
Under these guidelines almost EVERYONE at Wa Griz on game day could be cited...

Montana Code - 45-8-101 — Disorderly conduct

45-8-101. Disorderly conduct. (1) A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if he knowingly disturbs the peace by:
(a) quarreling, challenging to fight, or fighting;
(b) making loud or unusual noises;
(c) using threatening, profane, or abusive language;

(d) discharging firearms, except at a shooting range during established hours of operation; Discharge of a cannon should qualify.
(e) rendering vehicular or pedestrian traffic impassable; Getting to my tailgate ain't easy.
(f) rendering the free ingress or egress to public or private places impassable; Come on buddy I got a ticket let me in!
(g) disturbing or disrupting any lawful assembly or public meeting; Did you hear their fans cheer when they scored? What the heck this is OUR HOUSE!
(h) transmitting a false report or warning of a fire or other catastrophe in such a place that its occurrence would endanger human life; Would that include anyone posting about the Griz demise count?
(i) creating a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that serves no legitimate purpose; or Come on it's only a wave...
(j) transmitting a false report or warning of an impending explosion in such a place that its occurrence would endanger human life. Would this be someone talking about the Cats offense?
 
kcjc69 said:
Under these guidelines almost EVERYONE at Wa Griz on game day could be cited...

Montana Code - 45-8-101 — Disorderly conduct

45-8-101. Disorderly conduct. (1) A person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if he knowingly disturbs the peace by:
(a) quarreling, challenging to fight, or fighting;
(b) making loud or unusual noises;
(c) using threatening, profane, or abusive language;

(d) discharging firearms, except at a shooting range during established hours of operation; Discharge of a cannon should qualify.
(e) rendering vehicular or pedestrian traffic impassable; Getting to my tailgate ain't easy.
(f) rendering the free ingress or egress to public or private places impassable; Come on buddy I got a ticket let me in!
(g) disturbing or disrupting any lawful assembly or public meeting; Did you hear their fans cheer when they scored? What the heck this is OUR HOUSE!
(h) transmitting a false report or warning of a fire or other catastrophe in such a place that its occurrence would endanger human life; Would that include anyone posting about the Griz demise count?
(i) creating a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that serves no legitimate purpose; or Come on it's only a wave...
(j) transmitting a false report or warning of an impending explosion in such a place that its occurrence would endanger human life. Would this be someone talking about the Cats offense?
:thumb:
 
WopGriz said:
grizpsych said:
moxrox said:
People next to me who were high school principals told me he will most likely be tagged as a registered sex offender and it will never leave his record...apparently it is easier and easier to get that tag these days and it can ruin your life. They have no real security anymore...I was wiaiting for a cop to tackle him...forgot that they kicked the cops out for the "brownshirts"

Nope, they most likely charged him with disorderly contact just so he would not end up as a registered sex offender. By the way, get caught peeing in public, you run the risk of being a registered sex offender.

This is not true. For the most part almost all sex offense crimes that require registering are felonies. Rarely do misdemeanor's qualify and if they do, most of the time prosecutors don't push for lifetime registering for a misdemeanor offense.

It is true, and you're right. If you get caught peeing in public, you can be charged with a felony.
 
I know I'm definitely in the minority here, so rip me if you wish, but count me as one of the few that feel he should be suspended (if he's a student). Then to just let him wander the tailgates naked at half time was ridiculous. Yes I know he had a garbage sack around his waist, but it certainly didn't cover anything. Actions have consequences. Too had he didn't get close to the team, I would have loved to see Tru rock this kid like he did the running back!
 
It seems to me like it would be pretty easy to solve the streaker problem by issuing tasers to security. What seems crazy to me is that they are talking about kicking this kid out of school, but they let Richard Carpita into school just after he got out of jail and while still on probation for drug, alcohol and weapons charges and his only means of support were student loans and selling teen girls on the internet. Some odd priorities.
 
Back
Top