statler & waldorf
Well-known member
Everyone has an opinion, and something else. Point out my misconceptions, so I can proceed with living a 'correct' life.
grizindabox said:"... like bleaching your anus or waxing your woman friend's upper lip. Thanks again."
statler & waldorf said:grizindabox said:"... like bleaching your anus or waxing your woman friend's upper lip. Thanks again."
You sound like an expert. If you can't correct me on basketball, please show me your expertise in this 'related' area. :roll:
Ursa Major said:catattack said:NorthEndZoneDan said:so you've been to the Dance 3 times since 1951. Oh, and keep the trophy shiny, Bobby's comingcatattack said:Been awesome - I’ve been touching the brawl of the wild trophy for 2 straight years every time I walk by it? How has your post season been going?
Who is Bobby? The same chump who got fired from UNLV?
Your guys are delusional. Is Bobby gonna stop your attendance drops? When do you just give in with your second rate educational institution and drop down to NAIA? Perhaps you can compete with Rocky, Carroll, and Western? There are a limited number of liberal arts jobs out there
Looks like little brother is up way past his bedtime again. Daddy's about to get the belt out.
Thanks for the insightshfhmilkman said:Grats to the Grizzlies for playing hard. As a Michigan fan I thought we would win by 25 in an easy game. I did not think the Grizzlies had anyone to match up with Wagner. Yet they had a scheme that took him out completely. That was not just Wagner having a bad game but someone coming up with a great scheme and a team committing to the scheme. I think the 4 guard rotation was a great move for defense. They put a smaller guy on Duncan Robinson and he had maybe two good looks the entire game. Montana also forced 14 TO's which is unheard of to see from a Michigan team. Your defense was so good UM tried to force transition when nothing was there because they were doubting their base sets. To go forward Montana needs to develop something more than an iso guard offense. People were commenting on missed shots. As a former ball player I can tell you when someone is on you are you are a bit off balanced even easy shots can be missed. Someone was talking about needing another long range sniper. But to take advantage you need to move the ball side to side instead of guards thinking they can take their man off the dribble every time. That scheme might have worked against some teams. But the strength of the Michigan D was the perimeter play. I thought Montana not being able to take advantage of Simpson having to sit out the entire 1st half was the biggest key to the game. Jaaron Simmons has struggled to get minutes because he has not been a good defender. I'm trying to figure out how he did not get lit up.
statler & waldorf said:Reading your own press all week, eGrizzers, then reality bites. Shock and awe. How could that happen? This team needed to play that "man up" BB, that TDC talked about last week, for 40 minutes to pull this off. It didn't. 14 point loss is disappointing, but not unexpected.
Not like 2013, when a certain guard(I think)came out talking sh*t about kicking Syracuse ass, then ended up with the #6 worst ass kicking in NCAA Tournament history(47 pts.). That record is safe. Keep on drinking that KoolAid, sugar coaters. Suits ya! Great season Griz, tuff ending. :thumb: Bring on 2018-2019!
hfhmilkman said:Grats to the Grizzlies for playing hard. As a Michigan fan I thought we would win by 25 in an easy game. I did not think the Grizzlies had anyone to match up with Wagner. Yet they had a scheme that took him out completely. That was not just Wagner having a bad game but someone coming up with a great scheme and a team committing to the scheme. I think the 4 guard rotation was a great move for defense. They put a smaller guy on Duncan Robinson and he had maybe two good looks the entire game. Montana also forced 14 TO's which is unheard of to see from a Michigan team. Your defense was so good UM tried to force transition when nothing was there because they were doubting their base sets. To go forward Montana needs to develop something more than an iso guard offense. People were commenting on missed shots. As a former ball player I can tell you when someone is on you are you are a bit off balanced even easy shots can be missed. Someone was talking about needing another long range sniper. But to take advantage you need to move the ball side to side instead of guards thinking they can take their man off the dribble every time. That scheme might have worked against some teams. But the strength of the Michigan D was the perimeter play. I thought Montana not being able to take advantage of Simpson having to sit out the entire 1st half was the biggest key to the game. Jaaron Simmons has struggled to get minutes because he has not been a good defender. I'm trying to figure out how he did not get lit up.