Saying and doing are 2 different things. Which conference would be more appealing to the G5, the Big Sky or the WAC? I know which one I’d rather have if I’m the G5.ordigger said:Griz til I die said:That's exactly what I've been saying. If the G5 decides to form a playoff system, I could definitely see both the Big Sky and the Valley wanting to move up and join G5, and with the new NCAA constitution not far off, I don't that could prevent the Big Sky and MVFC from moving up. Of course each of these conferences would need to kick some teams out. Here's who I think could and couldn't do it from each of those conferences.
Big Sky teams that could: UM, MSU, Weber, Idaho, UC Davis, NAU (they could, but would they want to), maybe SAC, and maybe Cal Poly.
Big Sky teams that couldn't: UNC (would likely join the WAC), ISU (would also probably join the WAC or move down), PSU (probably join the Pioneer League and quit offering scholarships, and maybe the WAC or Big West for other sports), and Eastern (they would likely want to move up but they got work to do. No way current admin would let them. Therefore would join the WAC).
MVFC teams that could: NDSU, SDSU, S. Illinois, Illinois State, Missouri State, UNI, and maybe UND
MVFC teams that couldn't: South Dakota (Likely join OVC), Indiana State (likely join OVC), W. Illinois (already considering joining OVC), and Youngstown State (probably could move up, but I don't think they would. Therefore would join OVC).
Only problem is the WAC has already stated they want to move up as a conference and 2-3 of their programs are already expanding their facilities
I suppose if the WAC is so gun ho on moving up, they could just kick a lot of their current schools to the curb and pick up the Big Sky and Valley schools that wanna go. Come on let’s be honest, the only current schools I see ever being a feasible FBS school one day from the WAC is Abilene Christian and Tarleton.