bgbigdog said:
For the record, it was Stitt that didn't play Olsen when he could. There were a number of relatively good backers on the team at the time he ws coming up, so yes, I'd say he earned it. He was special teams all conference as a sophmore, and likely could have played defense a lot more than he did. Hauck was very complimentary out of the gate, and played him right away.
Right on queue, the Hauck apologists try to make it about Coach Stitt. Pathetic.
Look at the roster you clueless idiot. Olsen wasn’t playing as an underclassman because older guys like Josh Bus were ahead of him on the depth chart.
Sounds to me like all you did is illustrate the original point: RH was given preferential treatment. As a freshman and sophomore he played ahead of older, more experienced, bigger, stronger, faster players. Coach Hauck’s tough guy, old school “every position is up for grabs every week” mantra turned out to be complete and total bullsh*t.
Unfortunately for the cult of Hauck, Bobby’s arrogance and inauthenticity has worn thin. Combine that with an immature, ineffective, verbally abusive coaching staff and it doesn’t bode well for the future of this program.
And if you disagree, take it up with the players, player families, and people who have inside information into the situation. Not the people who are more a fan of Hauck than they are of the Griz. Or posters on this board who are too brainwashed to know the difference.
https://twitter.com/bigfranknyc/status/1599496320355442688?s=46&t=L9j2psgRZDXkIYSko22y0w