mthoopsfan
Well-known member
PTGrizzly said:mthoopsfan said:I don't agree that he struggled in pass defense. He may not have been a great pass defender, and didn't have great speed, but his coverage was fine. Most people criticizing his coverage on egriz, don't have a clue about secondary play, pass coverage, and the Griz schemes. Because I played in the secondary, watch secondary play, and discuss the subject with a few coaches and players, I think I have a better view than most on here.
You can have great technique, but if you’re not fast enough, 9/10 times it doesn’t matter. He was any easy target, and coaches as much as admitted they targeted him. But, when you have a good pass rush, that limits the damage that can be done.
Was the forward pass even invented when you played ball? I’m joking, of course, but the game has changed a lot since you played. Robby wasn’t good in coverage, and honestly, it’s obvious on tape. He was assignment steady and technically sound, but small and slow. Sometimes you can’t make up for that. Works against bad teams, but every good team we played it showed on tape.
What you said is not true for secondary pass defense, especially at the college level. Technique, being lined up right, knowledge of the defensive scheme, eyes, quickness, reaction time, strong hands/arms, watching of tape, ability to run backwards and turn quickly and efficiently, etc. are far more important than speed. Sure, speed helps, and can cover up for mistakes, but most of the time those other things are far more important than speed.
Safeties that can see the field, know or have a sense of what's coming, and get a jump on the play/ball, make up for lack of speed.
Tim Hauck wasn't fast, yet he was a very good NFL player. Colt Anderson wasn't fast. Even Trumaine Johnson wasn't a burner.
The basic skills and technique for one on one pass coverage, and even zone, are actually fairly similar to what they were decades, i.e. what I just said above. Saying speed is most important 9/10 times is wrong, and really just plain stupid.
Yes, secondary coverages and schemes, and hybrid schemes, have gotten much more complicated and sophisticated.