UMGriz75 said:you are both so anxious to get pats on the head.
UMGriz75 said:The difference between "I want people to like me," -- the quote I specifically referred to -- and "I want people to like me. I want to please people. I want people to be happy that I’m the head football coach" is nonexistent. He was accurately quoted. From falsely claiming that Stitt had been heavily recruited before Montana, to publicly admitting enjoying being told "dirt" and "highly confidential information" about players and staff by coaches, you two are the bottom of the reporting heap you are both so anxious to get pats on the head.
In other words, I quoted him accurately, a nice lie on your part initially, but didn't quote a different part that you preferred for a different purpose. Are you for real? It's pretty clear to everyone you are "all in" for this coach, and will adjust your "coverage" accordingly.kyle_sample said:UMGriz75 said:The difference between "I want people to like me," -- the quote I specifically referred to -- and "I want people to like me. I want to please people. I want people to be happy that I’m the head football coach" is nonexistent. He was accurately quoted. From falsely claiming that Stitt had been heavily recruited before Montana, to publicly admitting enjoying being told "dirt" and "highly confidential information" about players and staff by coaches, you two are the bottom of the reporting heap you are both so anxious to get pats on the head.
1. Actually you quoted "I just want people to like me" so there is a difference. Had he said "I just want people to like me" it would imply that is what is most important to him.
kyle_sample said:3. Also let me know where I publicly admitted to enjoying being told "dirt" and "highly confidential information". I don't ever remember a coach or player or administrator sharing anything like that with me. So if you could show me where I publicly delighted in that, I'd appreciate it.
I suggested at the time that you ought to disavow at least telling people that "you don't know well personally" that you get all sorts of "very private" information about players and staff, and the notion that coaches were telling "special you" "serious dirt" about players and staff.Re: Question for insider
Postby casewinter13 » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:01 am
You could have 200 f***[*] years of experience in journalism and it doesn't mean you have any clue what Kyle has been told by the coaches. I know for a fact he's been told several very private pieces of information that he was asked not to share until a certain time, if ever, and out of respect, he did so. These weren't things every Joe Blow knew, it was serious dirt. I don't know Kyle well personally,
UMGriz75 said:kyle_sample said:3. Also let me know where I publicly admitted to enjoying being told "dirt" and "highly confidential information". I don't ever remember a coach or player or administrator sharing anything like that with me. So if you could show me where I publicly delighted in that, I'd appreciate it.I suggested at the time that you ought to disavow at least telling people that "you don't know well personally" that you get all sorts of "very private" information about players and staff, and the notion that coaches were telling "special you" "serious dirt" about players and staff.Re: Question for insider
Postby casewinter13 » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:01 am
You could have 200 f***[*] years of experience in journalism and it doesn't mean you have any clue what Kyle has been told by the coaches. I know for a fact he's been told several very private pieces of information that he was asked not to share until a certain time, if ever, and out of respect, he did so. These weren't things every Joe Blow knew, it was serious dirt. I don't know Kyle well personally,
You refused to do so, even though I noted at the time, with the Krakauer case, that student/athlete confidentiality was a big issue, and the idea that some nitwit journalist is running around telling practical strangers that he gets "dirt" from the coaches is just reprehensible, especially given that it was a big legal issue in the headlines at the time.
Now you are pleading ignorance?
I have a feeling it's for real.
Your friend was all over the place about how Stitt had been heavily recruited prior to Montana.kyle_sample said:2. I'm still waiting for you to furnish the articles or tweets from me that reported Stitt was "heavily recruited". You were a really great journalist in your day, so I'm sure you'll have those reports in no time........
And of course, in his fashion, Ferguson falsified what Stitt had actually said. And Sample, the Stitt crusader, left the impression stand, that Stitt had been recruited prior to Montana, and so he was obviously some kind of "get." You know, because Sample rampages over every alleged "misrepresentation" seeking, he says, "truth!!!" Except for that one, because it closely fit the narrative these two have been trying to feed Griz Nation. And by silence, he endorsed the false notion, just as by his silence with regard to receiving "dirt" and "very private" information about players and staff from UM coaches, he endorsed the notion that he did.George Ferguson said:What I bolded is completely backwards and wrong.UMGriz75 said:As I noted last year, much of the hype wasn't Stitt's fault, but the over-estimation of expectations by true believers which was unfair to the coaches, the team and the players, because unrealized over-exaggerated expectations invariably invokes a let-down. The transition, DII to DI, is a big one. For all the hype about Stitt, he even admitted in one interview he's never been recruited for a position before Montana.
"We've had many different opportunities to leave (Mines) over the years." Stitt said. "Montana, this is the only opportunity I've ever pursued. It's the only one where I really stayed awake at night thinking I could leave for. It's Montana. It's the Griz."
http://www.espn.com/college-football/st ... te-coaches"I was a small-college player, and I never had anybody in my entire coaching career call me up and say, 'Hey, you want this job?' I've had to interview and grind for every job I ever got," Stitt said. "This is the first time somebody called me and asked me if I was interested. I've been ready for this for a long time."
Sample running around bragging to veritable complete strangers, for no apparent ethical or professional reason, that he gets "dirt" and "very private information" from UM coaches offers a mystery to me as to whether he enjoys it, he was confessing to an outrage, he was bragging about his status, or trying to impress a potential date. I was not the source of the comment. I admit to finding "motive" incomprehensible in that kind of remark. UM coaches do not, or at least should not, be dishing "dirt" about players and staff. Running around claiming they do is irresponsible.argh! said:"enjoyed" getting personal info on students. i don't see any proof that he enjoys it, that he searches it out, or that he shares it. keep trying to obfuscate your way to "victory", though. it says a lot about you.
Sample demanded answers. He got them. He lied about me "misquoting" Stitt: the quote was direct. He lied about not knowing anything about "dirt" from coaches, and he pretended ignorance at news reporting about Stitt having been "recruited" before Montana.brewskis said:Holy desperation Batman.
UMGriz75 said:Sample demanded answers. He got them. He lied about me "misquoting" Stitt: the quote was direct. He lied about not knowing anything about "dirt" from coaches, and he pretended ignorance at news reporting about Stitt having been "recruited" before Montana.brewskis said:Holy desperation Batman.
Seems like a real journalist would not make that many false claims, right? Batman?
kyle_sample said:UMGriz75 said:Sample demanded answers. He got them. He lied about me "misquoting" Stitt: the quote was direct. He lied about not knowing anything about "dirt" from coaches, and he pretended ignorance at news reporting about Stitt having been "recruited" before Montana.brewskis said:Holy desperation Batman.
Seems like a real journalist would not make that many false claims, right? Batman?
You might literally be the dumbest, most dense, person I've ever not met. I wonder what your next illogical jump will be. But while we wait, you might want to run on down to Albertsons where they're having a savings on tinfoil. I just want to make sure you have all the headwear you can have as these temps drop. You gotta protect that wonderful brain of yours.
UMGriz75 said:The difference between "I want people to like me," -- the quote I specifically referred to -- and "I want people to like me. I want to please people. I want people to be happy that I’m the head football coach" is nonexistent. He was accurately quoted. From falsely claiming that Stitt had been heavily recruited before Montana, to publicly admitting enjoying being told "dirt" and "highly confidential information" about players and staff by coaches, you two are the bottom of the reporting heap you are both so anxious to get pats on the head.
You're reading too much of 74.5's shit. That was one sentence out of a spiel where Stitt describes wanting people to be proud of the football team. There was nothing disturbing about it.Blgs Griz Fan said:I find Stitt's quote about just wanting people to like him interesting and maybe a little disturbing. He was hired to coach an FCS football team to be competitive, be conference champions and compete for the national championship. I doubt the criteria for hiring included having people like him.
Coaches should be judged on their records, on the academic progress of their student athletes, and on the qualities of their players after graduation. There is a difference between being liked and being respected.