• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Spring game wrap up

Status
Not open for further replies.
BWahlberg said:
Well it was a nice thread while it lasted
Yes, and it would have been nice to have a live-stream, but you can see where even innocuous suggestions end up.
 
rimrockgriz said:
grizaremoregooder said:
I think Reese Phillips will be the best quarterback on the roster before fall camp after watching the scrum today. He throws a better ball, is mobile, looks defenders off of the receivers, and just moves like a quarterback. The receivers dropped a lot of Reese's passes that hit them in the fricken numbers today TERRIBLE DROPS. He may over take Gus in fall camp for the starting job. I was hoping he would get a series with the 1's to see what he could do. Gus was solid today and had a few nice deep throws but is still bombing the ball badly over the receivers heads. The offense is totally dependent on big plays (like last year) with him behind center because there is absolutely no run game to speak of. The running game would be greatly helped by a mobile quarterback like Phillips. The Griz have three quarterbacks that can play at the FCS level at a high level going into next season and have great quarterback depth. I was also really impressed with Cody McCombs and I think he would have seen the field a lot this season if he could play. He is the best running back the Griz have. All other running backs were non factors today plain and simple. James Homan and Jerry Louie McGee will be stars this season and both are great players. I think Collin Bingham will also be on the field a lot and will really push Horner and Ralston (bad drop today) he reminds me of the Sandland kid MSU had last season. Jesse Sims is an absolute monster! Treshawn Favors broke a big run and Sims ran him down from ten yards back. They were dropping Sims back into pass coverage (did well) and he was great pass rushing off of the edge. The defense as a whole is a very, very solid group and the new DT transfers are a huge gain for the defense. It will be tough to score on this group. The kicking game is really, really bad.
I'm not sure what you see when you watch football? I couldn't possibly disagree more on your comments regarding the Q.B. position. Chalich and Phillips were light years behind Gus at the scrimmage yesterday. Gus was wearing #3 and the other two were wearing numbers 11, and #12, FYI. Maybe you were one of the "Sims' guys from last year that thought his running prowess would save the Griz too ?? Just for the sake of not trying to sound like an "ass" I'll leave the rest of your comments alone... :egriz:
How long has Phillips been on the roster learning the offense? Most of the new transfers don't even know the fight song yet...seriously I watched them try to song it and it was pretty funny. Phillips tossed 4 scored yesturday and looked pretty good doing it despite not being a Griz for very long. He will get a lot better before fall camp......I think. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he ends up in the mix during fall camp four months from now. I guess I just a higher ceiling with Phillips than Gus when it comes to running the offense.
 
I can't imagine why Stitt would care 2 diddly dog gones if other teams see his offense. Stitt himself has said this isn't an offense that that runs a certain play off of any one formation. This is an offense that takes what the Defense gives them based on how they line up against our Offense. The play is made by the QB at the line of scrimmage.
 
UMGriz75 said:
Bear Axed wrote:
Like any job, to get the 300 grand you lied about him getting, performance factors have to be met....he felt he didn't have the quality of factors to make those performance factors he needs to get to total the amount you lied about him having already got....
Bear Axed wrote:
Friggen liar....you said he earned 300 g's
a number of times...in a number of ways.....
Alluding to that's what he was paid last year....

You are a rather shallow socialist, bernie
Remember that little brouhaha that had you so incensed? To the tune of about 40 posts screaming "LIAR!"

You were proven wrong, proved publicly that you're an idiot and you've had a hard on every since. Get over it. There's no need to bring your failures to every thread just because I make a post. Grow up.

Last edited by UMGriz75 on Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:57 pm, edited 11 time in total.


Are you sure you don't wan't to edit this 3,
Maybe 4 more times? :oops:

Carry on....
 
Bear Axed said:
Are you sure you don't wan't to edit this 3,
Maybe 4 more times? :oops:

Carry on....
Just trying to arrange the formatting to make it as easy as possible for you to follow; given the evidence that you have difficulty doing so.
 
UMGriz75 said:
Bear Axed said:
Are you sure you don't wan't to edit this 3,
Maybe 4 more times? :oops:

Carry on....
Just trying to arrange the formatting to make it as easy as possible for you to follow; given the evidence that you have difficulty doing so.


thanks

Like you....
I need more help than I can get...... ;)
 
Richard Cranium said:
I can't imagine why Stitt would care 2 diddly dog gones if other teams see his offense. Stitt himself has said this isn't an offense that that runs a certain play off of any one formation. This is an offense that takes what the Defense gives them based on how they line up against our Offense. The play is made by the QB at the line of scrimmage.
Well, EverettGriz accused Stitt of that.

True or not? I wouldn't speculate on that. EG speculates. It does seem like the positives of live-streaming and promoting scrimmages, the program, and the University overall outweigh the negatives, if there are any. If a successful Spring Game can produce new ideas to move the program forward, that's at least one of them.
 
UMGriz75 said:
Richard Cranium said:
I can't imagine why Stitt would care 2 diddly dog gones if other teams see his offense. Stitt himself has said this isn't an offense that that runs a certain play off of any one formation. This is an offense that takes what the Defense gives them based on how they line up against our Offense. The play is made by the QB at the line of scrimmage.
Well, EverettGriz accused Stitt of that.

True or not? I wouldn't speculate on that. EG speculates. It does seem like the positives of live-streaming and promoting scrimmages, the program, and the University overall outweigh the negatives, if there are any. If a successful Spring Game can produce new ideas to move the program forward, that's at least one of them.

75, do you know for certain that EG was speculating? Or were you just speculating that he was speculating?
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
75, do you know for certain that EG was speculating? Or were you just speculating that he was speculating?
For some reason, EG decided to take issue on another thread about whether UM was "The" University of Montana or not, got quite heated about it, and finally declared with absolute certainty that it was not so named in its charter.

I linked to the Charter. Oops. There's a "The."

On another recent occasion, he declared, with absolute certainty, that the UM Golf Course was bought by the U for future expansion. I noted that in fact, that was untrue, and it was purchased for open space recreation for UM students. He didn't like that either.

He combines absolute certainty with an unblemished record of error. The fact that he makes heated issues of relatively small items, based on what he claims are his direct knowledge, and the claims are then falsified would, and should, lead any careful person to be skeptical of EG's "certainty" and in particular with regard to what Coach Stitt believes, wants, orders, or prevents, unless there is a process of communion between those two souls that is not apparent. EG has not claimed that, maybe that's next.

As I noted, EG makes the accusation that this is Stitt's restriction on such publicity. I would not speculate either way on what Stitt believes on the point, but can point to the pros and cons of the idea.
 
Bear Axed said:
my Gawd!
UHhhMm75
is a turd with an agenda....
Let's see, NOT speculating about Stitt is an "agenda."

I'd say that odd thought comes from someone who was embarrassed over his 40 posts calling 'LIAR!" about Stitt's $300,000 contract and ... can't let go.

Let go. Get over it. You don't need to hijack every thread into your personal bitch session about "agendas." Even if it has become your all-consuming agenda.

As I noted, a very successful Spring Scrimmage is an opportunity, not for your mendacious agenda, but to move the program and the University forward.

If Stitt doesn't like the idea, so be it, but I am not the person claiming he didn't.
 
UMGriz75 said:
Bear Axed said:
It seems he thinks he needs to write a 1500 word essay in order for him to think
he's keeping his lack luster agenda hidden.... :?
Oooh, an Agenda! And what would be the purpose of said "Agenda!"?

Seems like you're the one with an "agenda" and drag it into every thread you can.

C'mon man. Even you're better than this. Every poster on this board has known your agendas since you began posting. Just be a man and own them. At least then we'd have some respect.
 
EverettGriz said:
C'mon man. Even you're better than this. Every poster on this board has known your agendas since you began posting. Just be a man and own them. At least then we'd have some respect.
Well, nice lie, for sure. It seems to have become your specialty.

But, since you are here, did Coach Stitt actually tell you he opposed livestreaming games? When? What did he say? Did he offer why he thought it was important to restrict promotion of UM Scrimmages? Did he confide this to just you, or was this by some other communication?

Be honest now.

Or did you make that up, too?

You repeatedly feel a need to derail threads with false claims. Is that an "agenda?"
 
What lie? Ask any regular poster on this board. They know your agendas. Shit, you type them daily in 40,000 words or less.

Did Stitt tell me? No. Did someone vey, very close to the program (and here I'm not talking about your buddy playa) tell me? Yes.

I've never made anything up, and can nearly assure you I have considerably more respect on this board than you could even aspire to have in your best dream. But I suspect you know all that, deflection being your only real argumentative weapon and all.
 
EverettGriz said:
I've never made anything up, and can nearly assure you I have considerably more respect on this board than you could even aspire to have in your best dream. But I suspect you know all that, deflection being your only real argumentative weapon and all.
Sorry, you were caught lying on several points. Your own self-gratification notwithstanding, you always pretend to know more about UM than you actually do. And then deflect when you are caught at it.

So, you didn't hear it from Stitt. You heard it from someone who was close to someone who was close to someone who was close to Stitt, who just happened to have discussed with Stitt "livestreaming" scrimmages.

Did you hear that from the same people that told you how the UM charter named "UM" and the same people that told you what the UM golf course was originally purchased for?

And you still believe them?

Thanks anyway for hijacking the thread.

We know your "agenda" now, don't we?
 
Nice. Credit where it's due: your deflection skills have improved dramatically over the past year.

It's a small thing, of course, but it's certainly something for you to begin to build on. Now, perhaps you'd like to address the actual issue being discussed. Please limit your response to 55,000 words or less. It's rather late after all
 
EverettGriz said:
Nice. Credit where it's due: your deflection skills have improved dramatically over the past year.
It's a small thing, of course, but it's certainly something for you to begin building on.
Well, it beats your odd outright lies about "The" University of Montana, and that the Golf Course was purchased purely for expansion. Oddly bizarre claims, frantically made as though they were IMPORTANT! Proving only that your claims of knowledge of UM are poor. Your odd debating points even poorer; evidence of an ego taking precedence over rationality. You know, "deflections."

Such as your latest, claiming you know what Stitt thinks.

Thanks once again for the hijack. I was talking about how to promote the program. Your "agenda" couldn't stand that because, as you now concede, you think you know more about UM, Stitt's thoughts, and forward progress using Scrimmages than anybody.

I don't know how the entire Griz Nation doesn't just bow down to your brilliance.

What did UM's Charter say about UM's name, again? Remind everyone of what you claimed. Indignantly. Angrily. Because you "knew."

Any other news on Stitt's most intimate thoughts of UM Griz Football?

Since you now claim to be the exclusive source.

There was a great Scrimmage. It could offer all sorts of possibilities for forward movement and promotion of this program and this University. It's at the level of "something new." Why are you such a selfish damper on that, imposing your personal agendas on suggestions to elevate the public relations value?

Perhaps, because of your "agendas?"
 
UMGriz75 said:
EverettGriz said:
I've never made anything up, and can nearly assure you I have considerably more respect on this board than you could even aspire to have in your best dream. But I suspect you know all that, deflection being your only real argumentative weapon and all.
Sorry, you were caught lying on several points. Your own self-gratification notwithstanding, you always pretend to know more about UM than you actually do. And then deflect when you are caught at it.

So, you didn't hear it from Stitt. You heard it from someone who was close to someone who was close to someone who was close to Stitt, who just happened to have discussed with Stitt "livestreaming" scrimmages.

Did you hear that from the same people that told you how the UM charter named "UM" and the same people that told you what the UM golf course was originally purchased for?

And you still believe them?

Thanks anyway for hijacking the thread.

We know your "agenda" now, don't we?
75,
I don't know anyone who has more conflicts with other posters on this board than you. Think about it for a minute, you have ongoing contentious battles with Helenahandbasket; AZ Griz Fan; Bear Axed; Grizinabox; EG and others. The one common denominator in all of these conflicts is you. I'm not saying your view points are right or wrong but what I'm suggesting is maybe you just need to let some of this roll off your back.

Not everyone is going to agree with your points of view. Everyone is however sick and tired of the multipage battles you engage in with multiple posters. You often bring up interesting points of view. No need to have them always end up in a protracted contentious argument here.
 
UMGriz75 said:
EverettGriz said:
Nice. Credit where it's due: your deflection skills have improved dramatically over the past year.
It's a small thing, of course, but it's certainly something for you to begin building on.
Well, it beats your odd outright lies about "The" University of Montana, and that the Golf Course was purchased purely for expansion. Oddly bizarre claims, frantically made as though they were IMPORTANT! Proving only that your claims of knowledge of UM are poor. Your odd debating points even poorer; evidence of an ego taking precedence over rationality. You know, "deflections."

Such as your latest, claiming you know what Stitt thinks.

Thanks once again for the hijack. I was talking about how to promote the program. Your "agenda" couldn't stand that because, as you now concede, you think you know more about UM, Stitt's thoughts, and forward progress using Scrimmages than anybody.

I don't know how the entire Griz Nation doesn't just bow down to your brilliance.

What did UM's Charter say about UM's name, again? Remind everyone of what you claimed. Indignantly. Angrily. Because you "knew."

Any other news on Stitt's most intimate thoughts of UM Griz Football?

Since you now claim to be the exclusive source.

There was a great Scrimmage. It could offer all sorts of possibilities for forward movement and promotion of this program and this University. It's at the level of "something new." Why are you such a selfish damper on that, imposing your personal agendas on suggestions to elevate the public relations value?

Perhaps, because of your "agendas?"

Let me know when you'd like to have a credibility contest, 75. For that, I'm always available.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top