Atlanta Griz1 said:
You and your Wally World followers continue to have my post go squarely over you head! Your most recent lame attempt to be relevant by posting this list of Griz greats means absolutely NOTHING in the context of the topic of this thread.
Oh yeah? Your thread title is simply, "why can SUU out-recruit us?" And then you counter your own thread title by closing the post with this:
Atlanta Griz1 said:
2) this was a one-time phenomenon, and they got lucky with lightly-recruited players that developed into studs.
So you use one point to pretty much un-do the purpose of your thread and it's title as easily and obviously the reason why. Yep SUU got some studs on defense, the Griz have studs on defense all the time, SUU had a few on one team. Good for them.
But... in true Growler fashion, you don't end there and dig your own grave:
Atlanta Griz1 said:
It did not suggest that SUU was a better team, or consistently out-recruited us.
Then explain the thread title?
Atlanta Griz1 said:
All it stated was that they were able to find two players at the D-back position who were certainly better than the group of D-backs we have recruited the past 3-4 years. Period!!!
Ah yes, adding to your straw man argument! You never mentioned any specifics of comparison to current or recent Grizzly safeties. This is your first mention of it. How were posters to know? You're trying to revise your argument to give it more credibility when, in fact, you make yourself look like even more of an ass.
Atlanta Griz1 said:
If you are unable to understand, or even admit that this fact is true, then you are a worse homer than I even thought!
Except you didn't use this argument until now. Did SUU have better safeties than the UM in the last 3-4 years? Of course they did. You didn't make this argument in your original post, how could one provide a counter point without an actual point to argue?
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Does being recruited by the NFL mean anything to you? Is it possible for you to EVER admit that any other team does something better than we do?
Again with the just making stuff up out of air. Nowhere did I admit the Griz do everything right. You're just making up some random, and totally pointless attack.
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Every Griz fan with a clue knows that our safety and CB positions have not been of the quality that we used to recruit, for the past few years.
The play of JR Nelson and Nate Harris was pretty good last year, especially down the stretch. JR was poised to be 1st team all-conference, maybe still could be pending his appeal. Markell Sanders appears to be a good starting guy but we'll have to see. Parker was looking like a good fit but left b/c he didn't mesh with Stitt and company. We're thin at CB this year but I don't think our CB recruits have been terrible. We got spoiled with Tru, he's an impossible benchmark to set our standard on.
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Yet, SUU was able to recruit two kids good enough to be drafted by the NFL. If you will go back and re-read my first post, I listed being "lucky" about hitting on a couple of marginal kids who had no other offers as one possibility. But, you and the sugar brigade find it necessary to jump my ass accusing me of stating that SUU was better at recruiting, in general, than UM. Something I do not believe, nor ever stated!
Oh man... yeah I mean where could I have had that type of idea that you said something like that.... hmm... maybe in your THREAD TITLE?
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Why Can Southern Utah Out-Recruit Us?
Atlanta Griz1 said:
Why don't you and your minions try to be objective for once in your life, instead of trying to slam every one of my posts with off-the-topic, irrelevant posts?
Oh I think we've thoroughly found out who can't be objective, who attacks others, and who makes irrelevant posts there skippy.
And BTW, I'm carrying over the score from MB. And considering you just got eviscerated I'm calling this one a grand slam and tallying 4 points scored. It's 64-0. Mercy rule anyone?